Quote:
Originally Posted by connectz
Fuck that...terrible move by natnet. No programs are going to chose you based on this deal. Most should back away.
Brad got tired of spending the money to support his filipino coded program and handed it off to you to do the dirty work and babysit. Being associated with a program in a way, that marketing it becomes profitable to you, makes people think twice about your integrity. Would you recommend nats or mpa3 over executive stats now...will you give those clients the same support? This is not good. I always thought natnet was the pillar. Not now. Hosting companies shouldn't make "deals" that can affect their bottom line based on what peripheral software/program someone chooses.
You're answers to my questions will be yes, but the questions will always be there in the back of people's minds.
This makes natnet look very bad. Not a slam, simply the reality.
|
wow.. some pretty big accusations..
first we've never hired any Philipino programmers to do any code work.. the main code was done in Vancouver Canada.. secondly.. alliances work well in ways that some don't think about.. MPA3 recently hooked up with Paycom.. should that make us move away from Paycom??? not at all.. I see it as a new division that paycom can offer its new programs.. as Nat Net can now offer another product to its clients besides just hosting... and no.. Nat Net would never put any customer back b/c they use another product.. nor would we expect them to.. but thank you for bringing up some other points
