Why it makes me embarressed to be a member of FSC

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • roscoe98
    Confirmed User
    • Sep 2003
    • 689
    #1

    Why it makes me embarressed to be a member of FSC

    I am a member of FSC but what gets me is these to commenst they have posted on their site

    ("Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.")

    Then to see this on the same page

    ("An injunction hearing is scheduled for August 8 and August 9, and the deal applies only to those who are members of the FSC by 2 p.m. Pacific time on June 25.

    I don't like the idea that they are portraying themselves to have all in the industry best interests at heart but yet this deal only includes THEIR members.

    Like i said im a member simply because i believe in the cause..but I can't say i agree with what this has turned out to be.
    I mean if the DOJ had such a bad case why not jut go and push the injuction thru right then and there and cover everybody?

    What did i miss here?

    $500.00 a MONTH BONUS CASH!
    HOSTED GALLERIES!
    EXCLUSIVE CONTENT!
    80% PAYOUT DAYS!
    Tags: None
    • bringer
      i have man boobies
      • Jul 2003
      • 13082
      #2
      Originally posted by roscoe98
      What did i miss here?
      about 53 threads covering the same thing
      333-765-551

        Comment

        • roscoe98
          Confirmed User
          • Sep 2003
          • 689
          #3
          Originally posted by bringer
          about 53 threads covering the same thing
          I have read many of them but have yet to see specific answers to this question.

          Sorry if its a SOS question.

          $500.00 a MONTH BONUS CASH!
          HOSTED GALLERIES!
          EXCLUSIVE CONTENT!
          80% PAYOUT DAYS!

            Comment

            • strats
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Feb 2004
              • 1805
              #4
              If that is true, it's pretty fucked

                Comment

                • Adam-EB
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 393
                  #5
                  Originally posted by roscoe98
                  I mean if the DOJ had such a bad case why not jut go and push the injuction thru right then and there and cover everybody?
                  An injunction wouldn't cover everybody, either. It would only cover the plaintiffs, which includes the FSC and it's members.
                  SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                    Comment

                    • jact
                      Confirmed User
                      • Sep 2002
                      • 9134
                      #6
                      Sleep through law class?
                      Free agent

                        Comment

                        • roscoe98
                          Confirmed User
                          • Sep 2003
                          • 689
                          #7
                          Originally posted by Adam-EB
                          An injunction wouldn't cover everybody, either. It would only cover the plaintiffs, which includes the FSC and it's members.
                          Actualy an injuction does cover everybody!

                          It means the law is frozen without going into affect untill its constitutional merits are determind by the court.

                          $500.00 a MONTH BONUS CASH!
                          HOSTED GALLERIES!
                          EXCLUSIVE CONTENT!
                          80% PAYOUT DAYS!

                            Comment

                            • Redrob
                              Confirmed User
                              • Oct 2004
                              • 4791
                              #8
                              An injunction only covers the plaintiffs. If a law is being challenged and an injunction has been issued, the enforcement authorities seldom persue enforcement as they know the law is being challenged and would rather wait until the issues are decided because they don't won't to have all their hard work thrown out of court.

                              However, that being said, the enforcement authorities are NOT restrained by law from busting non-plaintiffs. This is how it was explained to me....

                                Comment

                                Previous template Next
                                Working...