half way there
An open letter to the ASACP Advisory Council - webmasters, feel free to agree or not
Collapse
X
-
-
bumpity bumpSexyScribe.com - Erotica Story Content - Adult Words for Adult Sites
ICQ: 249-715-034 | scribe at sexyscribe dot com
Make a statement. Hire a skilled writer.Comment
-
i will put up 500 bucks that says Joan will not reverse her position...you know why? She cant.
Does not matter every single one of those folks that supported .XXX way way back except for 1...will reverse there stance.
Last edited by MikeHawk; 06-20-2005, 07:28 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeHawki will put up 500 bucks that says Joan will not reverse her position...you know why? She cant.
Does not matter every single one of those folks that supported .XXX way way back except for 1...will reverse there stance.

Time to spill the beans?Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeHawki will put up 500 bucks that says Joan will not reverse her position...you know why? She cant.
Does not matter every single one of those folks that supported .XXX way way back except for 1...will reverse there stance.

Agree! Money talks - even when you are doing good deeds - like opposing CP.
I'm gonna set up two churches, three homes for abused children and support General Gonzales in his fight against evil porn. Did someone offer me commission on a new TLD? Gotta go :-)XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.Comment
-
Originally posted by WebbyAgree! Money talks - even when you are doing good deeds - like opposing CP.
I'm gonna set up two churches, three homes for abused children and support General Gonzales in his fight against evil porn. Did someone offer me commission on a new TLD? Gotta go :-)
I wonder if Baddog's Home For Wayward Girls and Rehabilitation Clinic can get some of that money.
The girls would really appreciate it.Comment
-
100% Agreed.Originally posted by ChokerI suggest people show their support for no .xxx by joining the FSC and telling ASACP to start thinking about cleaning house a little.Obey the CowgodComment
-
-
you know what - i've been thinking a LOT about this and here's my opinion.
I don't like .xxx
I don't like seeing the asacp publically support .xxx
reality is - i don't have the right to tell any organization other then my own house what to do - but with an organization like the asacp i do have the right to express my opinions and as a small sponser of them i would hope at least that they would at a min listen if only for a second as to what I have to say.
i don't see the asacp accepting money from .xxx in any way form or fashion as influeincing what they do or how they do it.
the asacp does in fact review those people who they accept money from, ensuring that they follow guidelines acceptable to the asacp and I'm wondering how it could be humaninaly possible for them to accept money from .xxx when it's open for almost any to buy a .xxx url and put anything they want up on it. there is no controll to my knowledge as to what goes on a .xxx url.
would it be possible for a person to buy a .xxx url and have content on it - like say a 17 year old having sex in a region of the world where it's legal to have that content? would the asacp support that?
what about non-nude stuff?
i'm left with the feeling that the .xxx url leaves the asacp susceptable to being sceen as supporting content that they screen all their other clients for and deny membership based on.This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
industry open call no - but ELECTED from those that contribute - maybe.................Originally posted by LightspeedI wholeheartedly agree.
Joan always blames everything on the "advisory committee" (that no one in this industry elected, btw). Joan might just be the puppet/scape goat here, but hey, ASACP needs a good double-talker up front.
Roasting Joan doesn't solve the problem of a committee that SPEAKS FOR THE INDUSTRY but is not ELECTED BY THE INDUSTRY.
Steve LightspeedThis dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
Originally posted by SleazyDreamyou know what - i've been thinking a LOT about this and here's my opinion.
I don't like .xxx
I don't like seeing the asacp publically support .xxx
reality is - i don't have the right to tell any organization other then my own house what to do - but with an organization like the asacp i do have the right to express my opinions and as a small sponser of them i would hope at least that they would at a min listen if only for a second as to what I have to say.
i don't see the asacp accepting money from .xxx in any way form or fashion as influeincing what they do or how they do it.
the asacp does in fact review those people who they accept money from, ensuring that they follow guidelines acceptable to the asacp and I'm wondering how it could be humaninaly possible for them to accept money from .xxx when it's open for almost any to buy a .xxx url and put anything they want up on it. there is no controll to my knowledge as to what goes on a .xxx url.
would it be possible for a person to buy a .xxx url and have content on it - like say a 17 year old having sex in a region of the world where it's legal to have that content? would the asacp support that?
what about non-nude stuff?
i'm left with the feeling that the .xxx url leaves the asacp susceptable to being sceen as supporting content that they screen all their other clients for and deny membership based on.
So, Sleazy, the word is that ASACP is polling their sponsors to get their input on this issue.
Can you confirm whether or not the advisory council has contacted you?Comment
-
i got some info email from them - trying to decypher it now. I'm not that bright and it's a little compleciated for my tiny brain. Other contributing members are probally smarter than me and made more sense of it.Originally posted by baddogSo, Sleazy, the word is that ASACP is polling their sponsors to get their input on this issue.
Can you confirm whether or not the advisory council has contacted you?This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
Originally posted by SleazyDreami got some info email from them - trying to decypher it now. I'm not that bright and it's a little compleciated for my tiny brain. Other contributing members are probally smarter than me and made more sense of it.
Feel free to forward it to me, and I will translate it to Canadian for you if you like.Comment
-
i'm not here to crusify the asacp, i believe they do good work. I support what they do cause i think it's a noble cause.Originally posted by baddogor . . . . you could always post it here ;)
I don't think personally accepting money from .xxx will change their mission - i'm only curious as to how by their standards that they accept other people they could accept a company that would allow anyone to upload anything to their url.This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
ASACP has sent a message to it's sponsors asking for their feedback, not about whether or not they support or oppose .XXX, but whether or not they believe ASACP communicated it's neutral position effectively originally, or whether ASACP should write a letter of retraction to ICANN. ASACP has asked it's sponsors to specifically address what they believe to be the best for ASACP, their companies, and the industry.Originally posted by princessIs there still no word from the advisory cancel or Joan?
As you're aware many companies are dealing with 2257 issues right now and will hopefully respond to the message to sponsors soon. Until more of them do, a final decision/ action on this will not be made.Comment
-
Aly - You should be a comedian.
I love you but what the mother fuck are you doing?
I know for a fact the "Original" Aly I met would be flipping out about this event and easily be opposed to it and its bias.
I hope the pay is good.Last edited by AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE; 06-22-2005, 12:08 PM.

NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |Comment
-
so ASACP won't oppose .xxx under any circumstances, you're just considering writing a new letter to ICANN and emphasizing that you're neutral...?Originally posted by Aly_AVNASACP has sent a message to it's sponsors asking for their feedback, not about whether or not they support or oppose .XXX, but whether or not they believe ASACP communicated it's neutral position effectively originally, or whether ASACP should write a letter of retraction to ICANN.I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
Originally posted by AlienQAly - You should be a comedian.
I love you but what the mother fuck are you doing?
I know for a fact the "Original" Aly I met would be flipping out about this event and easily be opposed to it and its bias.
I hope the pay is good.
LOL... THANKS! I AM OPPOSED TO .XXX . I have expressed that in many different terms many times in many forums but I do NOT control ASACP (nor do they pay me). I am ONE VOTE and ONE VOICE at ASACP and trust me, they all hear that voice a LOT. I am trying very hard to very objectively let the rest of you know why you haven't heard anything about this yet, without betraying the confidence of ASACPs sponsors and advisors, or breaking the obligations of my NDA.
DON'T CALL ME A PUSSY YOU BASTARD!
Comment
-
http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=231419
One-on-One Interview, Part Two: Stuart Lawley, chairman and president, ICM Registry
By: MJ McMahon
Posted: 2:00 pm PDT 6-22-2005
TORONTO - In the second part of our interview with Stuart Lawley, president and chairman of ICM Registry, Lawley goes on the record about various rumors regarding who has supported ICM's application for an . xxx sponsored Top-Level Domain (sTLD).
"AVNOnline.com: xBiz reported that ASACP will be a direct beneficiary of IFFOR. Hendeles has stated this is undecided. Which is it?
Stuart Lawley: This was a misquote.
Clearly the ASACP has goals and a membership complement that fulfills the charter of IFFOR. We have proposed to work closely with the ASACP to establish them as our [child porn] hotline for the .xxx registry. ASACP has been in negotiations with ICM for ASACP to serve as a hotline for reviewing reports of suspected child pornography and perhaps to carry out the secondary monitoring of .xxx sites for child pornography.
No formal deal or promises of funding have been made with ASACP, however, it would seem blindingly obvious and completely appropriate that ASACP would be seen as a likely recipient of grant funding to be issued by IFFOR's grant advisory committee. Those parties selected by the community to represent IFFOR's grant advisory committee will be responsible for making this decision, not ICM Registry."
http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=231419Comment
-
looks like.... nothing?Originally posted by baddogso, whatever happened about this?I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
Comment



Comment