Possibly disturbing discussion: are negroes an inferior race?

**wjxxx** · 06-17-2005, 04:02 PM

150 ......

**Pleasurepays** · 06-17-2005, 04:05 PM

Originally posted by JJJ

There are no differences in races.

Blame the news media, if people of all races and religons got along they would have nothing worth talking about.

JJJ

really?

no difference?

who is more likely to win a marathon - the average kenyan or the average vietnamese?

**Platinum Lantern** · 06-17-2005, 04:42 PM

This is the type of thread a young black man likes to see as MOTIVATION to continue the struggle to rise up and to help my people rise up and to inspire my people to live righteous and overcome any evil in our way.

As far as a country being ran by blacks
Let's try Jamaica, Bahamas, Belize

When you let the devil in, you invite problems for years to come (sometimes centuries)
With that being said, Europe has meddled and created problems in foriegn lands for thousands of years.

Ask the Native Americans
Ask Hawaii
Ask the African Slaves
Ask Gandi
Ask the recipients of Operation Iraqi Freedom

America as you know it was BUILT off of hundreds of years of SLAVE LABOR
To the devil that sounds A-Ok

Thats why the USA is so ahead even today.
Hundreds of years of slave labor

And you could try to use the arguement that it was so long ago that it isn't valid.
But I say this to you

If my great grandfather had 1 Billion Dollars
My grandchildren would be the recipents of millon dollar trust funds

This is where the expression OLD MONEY is best used

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 04:55 PM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

AIDS is not rampant in Africa because of homosexual sex. You just make shit up as you go and can't even make anything good up.

on a good note... enjoy the sun today. its nice in Bellevue.

Who the hell said anything about homosexual sex?

The reason its rampant is because due to religious beliefs they believe that HIV doesnt exist and that using condoms in a sin. I sure as hell dont think of HIV as a "gay" disease. Thats dated information to say the least

**nico-t** · 06-17-2005, 05:11 PM

i love this thread

**Pleasurepays** · 06-17-2005, 05:32 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

Who the hell said anything about homosexual sex?

The reason its rampant is because due to religious beliefs they believe that HIV doesnt exist and that using condoms in a sin. I sure as hell dont think of HIV as a "gay" disease. Thats dated information to say the least

haha. i went back and read your post and i am not sure where i got that either. sorry.. my bad!

too many long days... and i am trying to vent on a message board for something to do... and fucking that up too.

**killerkay** · 06-17-2005, 05:34 PM

Hey buddy I cant agree with you more, blacks are rediculous end of the story

Good Post DarkJedi

~ a REDNECK & Proud

**bllott** · 06-17-2005, 05:46 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

The real problem is just in corporate america as a whole. White people who think they arent racist yet have their heart beat escalate when they walk by a shady look black person more than a shady looking white person......Someone who would subconciously hire a harvard white person over a harvard black person.

this doesn't really prove anything. I'm not supporting mindless racism however: what you're saying above only backs DarkJedi's views. Simply put, all the facts above occur not because whites hate blacks but because past experience teaches that way. heart beat escalates around a black shaddy person of course. watch the news for all the murders and crime such as armed robbery or shootings, and believe me the majority isn't white. also, why are you even talking about a white harvard or a black harvard person? the social problems of the country aren't represented on that level. on the overall scale, look at the millions of average people and compare, don't give examples of harvard people. They will both get hired and make a fuckload more money than the average street crackheads, white or black

**bllott** · 06-17-2005, 05:53 PM

Originally posted by DarkJedi

More violence.
You just proved my point, ape: Negroes came from PRIMATES.

Caucasians came from WHALES.

Notice how one group likes to swim and the other is deathly afraid of water? Ever see an ape to the beach? How many whales do you see in the jungle?

The problem is that the politically correct crowd gets in the way of the facts.

speaking of facts:

Originally posted by http://www.naawp.com/crime_stats.htm

What image do you have of racial violence in the U.S.? What type of person do you think commits interracial or "hate" crime? If you get your information from the mass media (TV, radio, major newspapers, and popular magazines), you probably have an image of a vicious, ignorant, gun-loving, hate-filled, skinhead, Klansman, or militiaman - all white of course, that is a completely false stereotype. The truth is exactly the opposite!

The media, protected class minorities, and anti-white politicians expect you to twist in anguish over black-on-black crime or the rare but well-publicized white-on-black crime, but they never mention the much greater amount of black-on-white crime? Yes, blacks commit more crime against whites (1.58 million crimes per year) than they do against other blacks (1.34 million crimes per year)! It's a virtual war of black criminals and white victims!
You'll never read the facts in the national media! Why?

Paul Sheehan, an Australian reporter, dug out the following information for an article in the Sydney Morning Herald , May 2, 1995. Sheehan based his statistics on crime data compiled by the FBI and partially reported each year in The FBI Uniform Crime Report . These reports can be researched at the FBI's website, www.fbi.gov.

Since the FBI doesn't distinguish between Hispanics and whites, Sheehan's statistics don't adequately reflect the black-white crime situation. Only about 10-15% of Hispanics are white, with the rest being Indian or a mixture of white, American Indian, and blacks. Hispanic crime rates are almost as high as black crime rates. This means that the data Sheehan compiled on inter-racial crime is probably grossly understated since a considerable portion of the "white against black" crime actually is Hispanic against black crime. (Information about this aspect of inter-racial crime will be presented in a related article.) Here is the information Sheehan uncovered in his analysis of the FBI's crime reports:

* Blacks murder more than 1,600 whites each year.
* Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
* Blacks murdered, raped, robbed, or assaulted about one million whites in 1992.
* In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and non-violent crimes against whites.
* Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than whites under 18.
* About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
* Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites, although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
* On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than whites.
* Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white neighborhoods.
* Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies in 1992, 31% (8.4 million) were committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by whites against blacks.
* Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
* Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million) are black against white.
* In the past 20 years, violent crime increased four times faster than the population.
* In the last 30 years (1964-94), more than 45,000 people were killed in interracial murders compared to 38,000 killed in Korea and 58,000 in Vietnam.
* Sheehan commented that the contents of his article could not possibly be published or discussed in the U.S. mainstream media.

In the last 50 years, the white part of the American population has declined from 90% to 72%. The U.S. now has about 33 million blacks and 25 million Hispanics (legal and illegal). By the year 2050, American whites will be a minority, just 49%. By 2100, whites will be 25% of the population. What will life for whites be like in the future?

http://www.naawp.com/crime_stats.htm as someone earlier posted

**ezrydn** · 06-17-2005, 06:02 PM

While I was keepin' my young ass alive in the paddies of Nam, a fellow grunt said to me, "There's a definite difference between a negro and a ni gger. And a ni gger ain't necessarily black!"

How so fucking true!

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 06:38 PM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

haha. i went back and read your post and i am not sure where i got that either. sorry.. my bad!

too many long days... and i am trying to vent on a message board for something to do... and fucking that up too.

hehe np

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 06:40 PM

Originally posted by bllott

this doesn't really prove anything. I'm not supporting mindless racism however: what you're saying above only backs DarkJedi's views. Simply put, all the facts above occur not because whites hate blacks but because past experience teaches that way. heart beat escalates around a black shaddy person of course. watch the news for all the murders and crime such as armed robbery or shootings, and believe me the majority isn't white. also, why are you even talking about a white harvard or a black harvard person? the social problems of the country aren't represented on that level. on the overall scale, look at the millions of average people and compare, don't give examples of harvard people. They will both get hired and make a fuckload more money than the average street crackheads, white or black

So whats the profile of a serial killer these days?

Single...WHITE...male ....

last time i checked atleast

**wjxxx** · 06-17-2005, 06:47 PM

**Matt 26z** · 06-17-2005, 06:58 PM

I can't figure out why the average young black male thinks it's ok to commit serious crimes.

Then you look at the black ghetto counterpart in the white race, the rednecks from trailer parks. You just don't see the same level of violent crimes coming out of them even though there's far more.

**Aric** · 06-17-2005, 07:05 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

So whats the profile of a serial killer these days?

Single...WHITE...male ....

last time i checked atleast

As opposed to many thousands of black murderers? What's your point? When you make comments like this, you really make your entire argument weak. It borders on... wait for it.. hypocrosy(sp). You are generalizing and stereotyping.. the exact thing you are arguing DarkJedi about.

Just saying.

I don't agree with either of you on this topic -- you are both at opposite ends of a complicated spectrum when that middle ground is staring you right in the face.

**Matt 26z** · 06-17-2005, 07:08 PM

Originally posted by Platinum Lantern

Thats why the USA is so ahead even today.
Hundreds of years of slave labor

That's total BS. The US is so far ahead today because all of Europe got bombed out during WW2. Their industries could not provide for the world, and it swung the momentum in our direction. Our industries were just waiting for the war to end and fill the gap.

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 07:16 PM

Originally posted by Aric

As opposed to many thousands of black murderers? What's your point? When you make comments like this, you really make your entire argument weak. It borders on... wait for it.. hypocrosy(sp). You are generalizing and stereotyping.. the exact thing you are arguing DarkJedi about.

Just saying.

I don't agree with either of you on this topic -- you are both at opposite ends of a complicated spectrum when that middle ground is staring you right in the face.

The only point i was making here was that there are more SINGLE WHITE serial killers than any other profile of person....

**sniperwolf** · 06-17-2005, 07:19 PM

they sure got a load of horsepower engine~

**Aric** · 06-17-2005, 07:21 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

The only point i was making here was that there are more SINGLE WHITE serial killers than any other profile of person....

So?

There are more violent "black" crimes than "white". I still don't get your point. There are also more middle eastern terrorists than any other... but racial profiling is a no-no around these parts.

You are generalizing. You are stereotyping. You are using "stats" but choose to ignore other "stats". Someone brought up Detroit and it's largely black population correlating to violent crime -- but you'll pass that off as the whites supressing the blacks. If you want to use stats to back up your flimsy argument, then accept facts that counter yours without making some stupid transparent excuse that dates back over 50 years.

Again, I don't agree with either of you guys and there's much more to be found in the middle ground of this, but your comments sure aren't helping.

**Matt 26z** · 06-17-2005, 07:22 PM

The reason why there are more white serial killers is because they blend into society long enough to strike multiple times before getting caught.

When you have a white serial killer living in a middle class neighborhood with no leads, he becomes much harder to capture than the black one time killer living in an area that for various reasons results in more leads.

**bllott** · 06-17-2005, 07:23 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

So whats the profile of a serial killer these days?

Single...WHITE...male ....

last time i checked atleast

yes.. and when you add up the numbers and read the above facts i quoted from the site, you make a really strong point. it's much worse to have 2-3 serial killers/year, than to have tens of thousands of single murder killers

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 07:26 PM

Originally posted by Aric

So?

There are more violent "black" crimes than "white". I still don't get your point. There are also more middle eastern terrorists than any other... but racial profiling is a no-no around these parts.

You are generalizing. You are stereotyping. You are using "stats" but choose to ignore other "stats". Someone brought up Detroit and it's largely black population correlating to violent crime -- but you'll pass that off as the whites supressing the blacks. If you want to use stats to back up your flimsy argument, then accept facts that counter yours without making some stupid transparent excuse.

Again, I don't agree with either you guys and there's much more to found in the middle ground of this, but your comments sure aren't helping.

My point is not that things are happening because of a direct opression. If i came off that way thats not what i meant.

What i meant was that it is a result based off of a cumulation of events in history.....

If your are stolen from your native land, thrown into a new place where you dont know the land, dont understand the society, dont know the language, and are thrown into slavery....then you finally get something REMOTELY CLOSE to equal existance only 50 years ago...then we'll see how you are....thats what i'm saying...whether my previous points made that clear or not

**bllott** · 06-17-2005, 07:26 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

The only point i was making here was that there are more SINGLE WHITE serial killers than any other profile of person....

no, a serial killer is not a single white killer. wtf are you talking about

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 07:33 PM

Originally posted by bllott

no, a serial killer is not a single white killer. wtf are you talking about

huh? I didnt say that. I said that more serial killers are Single and White than them being any other type of profile....

There are black serial killers, there are mexican serial killers....but there are more Single White serial killers than there are single black, single mexican, single asian....it is the leading profile of this particular crime

And yes...I realize there are other types of criminals out there beside serial killers. Just using it as an example

Perhaps I have lost my focus on my debates as well because some people just infuriorate me so much because of their views.

We're all equal and we're products of our enviroments. Everything is cause and reaction folks. Its simple physics....blacks in general come from a worse enviroment from whites...but thats not JUST because of the color of their skin. Thats because of how they have been treated due to the color of their skin over thousands of years. Maybe in my lifetime we'll break out of these trends...but thats a lot to ask for when we're up against thousands of years of hate

**pxxx** · 06-17-2005, 07:36 PM

Just out of nowhere, never seize to amaze me.

**bllott** · 06-17-2005, 07:37 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

My point is not that things are happening because of a direct opression. If i came off that way thats not what i meant.

What i meant was that it is a result based off of a cumulation of events in history.....

If your are stolen from your native land, thrown into a new place where you dont know the land, dont understand the society, dont know the language, and are thrown into slavery....then you finally get something REMOTELY CLOSE to equal existance only 50 years ago...then we'll see how you are....thats what i'm saying...whether my previous points made that clear or not

well how do immigrants from other countries come here where they don't know the land, don't know the society, don't know the language etc.. etc.. come and succeed then?

**Aric** · 06-17-2005, 07:37 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

My point is not that things are happening because of a direct opression. If i came off that way thats not what i meant.

What i meant was that it is a result based off of a cumulation of events in history.....

If your are stolen from your native land, thrown into a new place where you dont know the land, dont understand the society, dont know the language, and are thrown into slavery....then you finally get something REMOTELY CLOSE to equal existance only 50 years ago...then we'll see how you are....thats what i'm saying...whether my previous points made that clear or not

You're leaving one part out.. it's not today's blacks that were put in that situation. The 75 year old black dudes are not the problem here, it's the youths. There are tons of successful blacks today. If what you are arguing is true, there wouldn't really be any. It's the "why bother, The Man is just keeping me down" defeatist attitude that ruins them.

And if their parents/grandparents are feeding their minds with all the slave history, that's their fault. Sure, educate them on their history, but please... don't use it as a cop-out or a reason to fail.

There are plenty of opportunities for everyone. It's all about who wants it most. And anyone that preys on handouts does not get my respect -- no matter their race.

Sidenote:
Ever notice almost all ethnic comedians center their routine around whites? Gets laughs eh? What if all white comedians did that -- had a whole routine about blacks... oooohhh the shit storm. Remember Comedy Def Jam? I swear I never saw one routine that didn't have at least 3 "whitey" jokes. But I still laughed... to a point.

I am one of the least bit racists you'll ever meet, but there is a line. And I will call a spade a spade no matter the color of skin.

**bllott** · 06-17-2005, 07:41 PM

Originally posted by Aric

You're leaving one part out.. it's not today's blacks that were put in that situation. The 75 year old black dudes are not the problem here, it's the youths. There are tons of successful blacks today. If what you are arguing is true, there wouldn't really be any. It's the "why bother, The Man is just keeping me down" defeatist attitude that ruins them.

And if their parents/grandparents are feeding their minds with all the slave history, that's their fault. Sure, educate them on their history, but please... don't use it as a cop-out or a reason to fail.

There are plenty of opportunities for everyone. It's all about who wants it most. And anyone that preys on handouts does not get my respect -- no matter their race.

Sidenote:
Ever notice almost all ethnic comedians center their routine around whites? Gets laughs eh? What if all white comedians did that -- had a whole routine about blacks... oooohhh the shit storm. Remember Comedy Def Jam? I swear I never saw one routine that didn't have at least 3 "whitey" jokes. But I still laughed... to a point.

I am one of the least bit racists you'll ever meet, but there is a line. And I will call a spade a spade no matter the color of skin.

exactly.

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 07:42 PM

Kids are products of their parents.....from the grand parents, to the parents, to the kids.....Its about an advancement as a whole and if the grandparents were held pack , then the parents were held back, ad if the parents were held back the kids are held back...

And about the comedy stuff. Yes, very true. Just one of those things I guess I've accepted as a way of the world....and yes, i laugh my ass off

I'm white and from seattle...which makes me like double white or something. As white as white can be

.....But i'm still way more sensitive about injustives towards minorities than i am again the majority...ie white

**Aric** · 06-17-2005, 07:56 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

.....But i'm still way more sensitive about injustives towards minorities than i am again the majority...ie white

No doubt we're all a product of our upbringing and our culture and the fault must be shared by all involved. You can't single out "whitey" here, that would be foolish. At some point in all of our lives, we start thinking for ourselves. I was brought up Catholic, but when I hit the age of reason, that changed pretty quickly.

As for your sensitivity, how will you feel when the minorities outnumber the majority? Getting pretty close when you combine the minorities no?

All I am saying is that there has to be accountability and responsiblity. Continuing to blame "whitey" while, at the same time, they fail to educate their children about their real history -- is just plain wrong. It's a cop-out -- plain and simple. The child grows up learning to fail and "learning" where to place the blame. Blacks should be proud of how far they've come in this country, not use "whitey" as their failsafe for when things go wrong.

America is changing, and I think it's time that its inhabitants change with it. The past is the past; history is history; how about looking foward to what tomorrow brings?

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 08:01 PM

My point is not to blaim whitey for the problems with blacks. We have kinda gone down a different road away from the original arguement.

My arguement is that blacks are not an inferior race. That the same events could have happend to white skinned people and the black people could have had the road the whites would have and the same thing would have happend but just with the groups switching..

that was my point from the begining...all this other stuff has been people trying to change the point that is trying to be made...

**Aric** · 06-17-2005, 08:07 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

My point is not to blaim whitey for the problems with blacks. We have kinda gone down a different road away from the original arguement.

My arguement is that blacks are not an inferior race. That the same events could have happend to white skinned people and the black people could have had the road the whites would have and the same thing would have happend but just with the groups switching..

that was my point from the begining...all this other stuff has been people trying to change the point that is trying to be made...

My apologies if I twisted your argument -- the beer goggles are on tonight. I don't think any race is inferior. Given the right opportunies, any race could come out on top. I think we agree more than we disagree.

Thanks for keeping this mini-debate on a mature level. It's nice to be able to present an argument without the other resorting to name calling (which seems to be tradition around here).

Oh and

(it had to be done!)

**SureFire** · 06-17-2005, 08:21 PM

Originally posted by DarkJedi

Let's take a look at the picture as a whole.

Name ONE country being run by blacks that isn't in the process of total economic, social, or huminatarian collapse.

There isn't one.

As a whole, they cannot govern, feed, [provide medical care, etc. for themselves. Were it not for the handouts being given to them by WHITE people Africa would be rid of its population of negros in a few generations with the exception of a few isolated native tribes.

In the US, as a whole, they face similar issues. Jails are filled with blacks in a far greater percentage than their overall population. Welfare roles are filled with blacks in far greater numbers than their overal population. There are more fucking programs to help them get off of their lazy black asses and help them succeed than you can count and they STILL CHOOSE to live in abject poverty and squalor.

No other popluation in the US has a more profound sense of entitlement than the population of negros. I want, you owe me, give it to me while I sit at home and produce one bastard child after another.

Want rapid economic reform? Round them up, give each one a check for $100,000, and send them back to Africa. The population will be gone in short order.USA will save BILLIONS of dollars on housing inmates, housing projects, and medical care for drive by shootings and AIDS. Bank on it.

Discuss ?

Just clicked on this thread and did not read more. You got your facts wrong...the stronger tribes in Africa sold (profit) their fellow men (men, women and children) so why would you ask them to go back

Back to reading the responses.

**BlingDaddy** · 06-17-2005, 08:42 PM

I didn't read this thread... I'm white, and I won't read this thread.
I have no "jokes". I have no inferrences.

When speaking of an "inferior" race....... there are many... white, black, chinese, japanese, sudan, or whatever...... if you can't measure up you're inferior and I don't care if your painted orange.

I hope this silly ass thread ceases now.

**Pleasurepays** · 06-17-2005, 10:17 PM

why is it not fair to say or even consider that one race is more successful than another? i have no problem with that.

are all races on the planet equally successful? or.. can we plot races on a "success curve"? with some more successful, some less, most average?

why not?

why are people so sensitive about it? if someone told me "Hey, Asians are much better at math than Americans" i would have no trouble with that. If someone said "black people have bigger dicks than asians" i would think "good for them". if i said "kenyans are better marathon runners than mexicans" - no one would care.

in fact, we have no trouble at all accepting these obvious differences when there are not significant negative connotations attached to them.

but when you say "blacks are less successful than japanese economically and socially (crime, welfare etc)" you are just a crazed, racist asshole?

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 10:44 PM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

why is it not fair to say or even consider that one race is more successful than another? i have no problem with that.

are all races on the planet equally successful? or.. can we plot races on a "success curve"? with some more successful, some less, most average?

why not?

why are people so sensitive about it? if someone told me "Hey, Asians are much better at math than Americans" i would have no trouble with that. If someone said "black people have bigger dicks than asians" i would think "good for them". if i said "kenyans are better marathon runners than mexicans" - no one would care.

in fact, we have no trouble at all accepting these obvious differences when there are not significant negative connotations attached to them.

but when you say "blacks are less successful than japanese economically and socially (crime, welfare etc)" you are just a crazed, racist asshole?

I think this is because of 2 reasons:

1) When you're dealing with the mind versus something physical it is viewed very differently

2) In my opinion ...it is always blacks who are called to be not as smart, or not as much in control of their actions...ie ...violent.

Also, making comments like this is always dumb unless you look at the big picture.

ie....

Asians are smarter.

I mean, hell...i believe it. But i think this has to do with a strict up bringing and a white kid or a black kid for that matter in the exact same enviroment wouldnt be any more or less likely to be as smart

or how bout this one....

Black's are generally more advanced physically (more muscular)

If we go to africa we see that this is not the case. There are many tall, lanky black people. But this is a view of African-Americans. And many of these people were the decendants of slaves who were bread like farm animals to create the "super worker"

**Odin88** · 06-17-2005, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by Platinum Lantern

This is the type of thread a young black man likes to see as MOTIVATION to continue the struggle to rise up and to help my people rise up and to inspire my people to live righteous and overcome any evil in our way.

As far as a country being ran by blacks
Let's try Jamaica, Bahamas, Belize

When you let the devil in, you invite problems for years to come (sometimes centuries)
With that being said, Europe has meddled and created problems in foriegn lands for thousands of years.

Ask the Native Americans
Ask Hawaii
Ask the African Slaves
Ask Gandi
Ask the recipients of Operation Iraqi Freedom

America as you know it was BUILT off of hundreds of years of SLAVE LABOR
To the devil that sounds A-Ok

Thats why the USA is so ahead even today.
Hundreds of years of slave labor

And you could try to use the arguement that it was so long ago that it isn't valid.
But I say this to you

If my great grandfather had 1 Billion Dollars
My grandchildren would be the recipents of millon dollar trust funds

This is where the expression OLD MONEY is best used

Fuck off you piece of shit. Your comparison to Europe and White people as 'the devil' is ridiculous. Should I list all the African nations who STILL participate in slave labour today? Or who force 10 year olds to fight in ethnic wars against their will? Or perhaps I could inform you of the European slave trade that was in Northern Africa not so long ago? I think the thread is midnelessly provocative but it really pisses me off when people find a way to blame everything on the white man.

Western civilisation may have been brutal in the past, as where all civilisations, but the difference is Western civilisation has evolved. Western civilisation has given women the vote, has given equal opportunity to all, has even DISCRIMINATED against its own people to please minorities, it to this day is the most free and prosporous civilisation in the world yet people still like to hammer white men down for just about everything which occured at a point in history when all the world was equally barbaric (who do you think sold the slaves in Africa - blacks, who do you think ran the major shipping companies to the USA - Jewish people, and who bought the slaves, Whites) all the while forgetting what is STILL happening today.

So here is something for you to ponder on. Rather than hammering the white man for owning slaves (who you seem to contribute the success of the USA too, lol) why don't you talk about the other participants, or why don't you think about the MILLIONS of people still enslaved today in Africa, and elsewhere, or the 10 year old boys who are abducted and forced to fight in wars they don't support, and the girls who are raped and murdered.

**Odin88** · 06-17-2005, 11:27 PM

Originally posted by BlueWire

If we go to africa we see that this is not the case. There are many tall, lanky black people. But this is a view of African-Americans. And many of these people were the decendants of slaves who were bread like farm animals to create the "super worker"

Actually the difference is not they where individually hand picked because they are strong, but because the tall lanky Africans are from East Africa, and the stronger ones are West Africans (or maybe I have it the wrong way around)? But either way, the distinction within the one 'black' race itself is not one between individuals, it is more of a sub-racial difference (like Nordic Europeans and Slavic Europeans).

**BlueWire** · 06-17-2005, 11:29 PM

Originally posted by Odin88

Actually the difference is not they where individually hand picked because they are strong, but because the tall lanky Africans are from East Africa, and the stronger ones are West Africans (or maybe I have it the wrong way around)? But either way, the distinction within the one 'black' race itself is not one between individuals, it is more of a sub-racial difference (like Nordic Europeans and Slavic Europeans).

Yes, this is true...and it was the more muscular "built" ones that were and perhaps in some areas still are forced to mate to create "Super Workers"

**alexg** · 06-17-2005, 11:39 PM

DarkJedi should write an e-book on successful gfy posting.

**Hank_Heartland** · 06-17-2005, 11:47 PM

Originally posted by wjxxx

DarkJedi is from Ukraina not Poland and Black Madonna as far as I know isn`t negro

Black is black...you're right she's purple

**Repetitive Monkey** · 06-17-2005, 11:51 PM

Originally posted by alexg

DarkJedi should write an e-book on successful gfy posting.

Code:

shuffle($politically_correct_dogma);
$topic=$politically_correct_dogma[0];
$stance=array_reverse($politically_correct_dogma[0][stances_sorted]);
$title="FACT: ".$stance[0]." ".$topic;
$post.=post($stance[arguments][0],$stance[0]);
$post.=post($stance[arguments][1],$stance[0]);
$post.=post($stance[arguments][2],$stance[0]);
$post.=post($stance[arguments][3],$stance[0]);
post_all();

**Hank_Heartland** · 06-17-2005, 11:57 PM

Originally posted by killerkay

Hey buddy I cant agree with you more, blacks are rediculous end of the story

Good Post DarkJedi

~ a REDNECK & Proud

My friend you are and stupid asshole!!!

**DarkJedi** · 06-18-2005, 12:01 AM

Originally posted by Hank_Heartland

Black is black...you're right she's purple

Thre's a sound theory she's black because various art forms have turned black as a result of certain physical factors such as: deterioration of lead-based pigments; accumulated smoke from the use of votive candles; and accumulation of grime over the ages.

**DarkJedi** · 06-18-2005, 12:06 AM

Originally posted by BlueWire

My point is not that things are happening because of a direct opression. If i came off that way thats not what i meant.

What i meant was that it is a result based off of a cumulation of events in history.....

If your are stolen from your native land, thrown into a new place where you dont know the land, dont understand the society, dont know the language, and are thrown into slavery....then you finally get something REMOTELY CLOSE to equal existance only 50 years ago...then we'll see how you are....thats what i'm saying...whether my previous points made that clear or not

Bullshit. You've had 150 years to correct this. How fucking long does it take? I could see a couple generations being fucked up but you'd think after all that oppression you'd be running out to take advantage of all your new freedoms.

Black culture just seems anti-intellectual.

Negroes seem to idolize the "easy" ways to an easy life. Hard work and education are anathema. Instead, hustling, pimping, crime, and flaunting one's ill-gotten gains are glorified. Genuinely intelligent blacks who seek to be intellectual or more agreeable careers are seen as traitors to their race, even trying to "be white".

It's easier to blame White men for everything, particularly when your brain is so underequipped to do anything more.

**DarkJedi** · 06-18-2005, 12:14 AM

Originally posted by Platinum Lantern

This is the type of thread a young black man likes to see as MOTIVATION to continue the struggle to rise up and to help my people rise up and to inspire my people to live righteous and overcome any evil in our way.

As far as a country being ran by blacks
Let's try Jamaica, Bahamas, Belize

When you let the devil in, you invite problems for years to come (sometimes centuries)
With that being said, Europe has meddled and created problems in foriegn lands for thousands of years.

Ask the Native Americans
Ask Hawaii
Ask the African Slaves
Ask Gandi
Ask the recipients of Operation Iraqi Freedom

America as you know it was BUILT off of hundreds of years of SLAVE LABOR
To the devil that sounds A-Ok

Thats why the USA is so ahead even today.
Hundreds of years of slave labor

And you could try to use the arguement that it was so long ago that it isn't valid.
But I say this to you

If my great grandfather had 1 Billion Dollars
My grandchildren would be the recipents of millon dollar trust funds

This is where the expression OLD MONEY is best used

Blacks blaming white society is a joke.

Just look at the Asians, Mexicans, and Indians. They bust their butts and are making good of opportunities both offered (education) and made (New businesses) for themselves. If I was black, I'd be wondering why my race wasn't advancing and be very afraid and ashamed.

How many Indians are screaming "Whitey is keeping us down."?

**BigDickMike** · 06-18-2005, 12:16 AM

Originally posted by BlueWire

The reason why countries that are mostly "black" struggle and areas in US mostly black being economically depressed is because of racist idiots like you....

the banker that will give the white person a biz loan but not the black guy...
the white employer that won't hire the black guys...
The colleges that don't admit as many blacks as whites if you can't shoot a jumpshot....

The truth is ...look at hicks of the suburbs of any state....there is more white trash in this country then poor black people....thats the real truth

hey dumbass-

america is home to free enterprise last fucking check. blacks are free to start there own FUBU corporations and biz's and hire all blacks if they want. its not my fault some hahahahahaha is to lazy to get a job. but i pay his welfare anyway so stop bitching or i'll come take my check back that the gov gives you for being a bum.

**BigDickMike** · 06-18-2005, 12:40 AM

Originally posted by BlueWire

So whats the profile of a serial killer these days?

Single...WHITE...male ....

last time i checked atleast

Why don't you talk about gang murder's. single, black, male. then compare the numbers of gang murders to the number of serial killer murders per year. the reason you here about white killers is because it abnormal. a black man killing 5+ gang members in LA is a daily affair.

How many murders were commited in the US by blacks? How many by whites?

Now, take those numbers and compare the number of blacks to whites.

Then get your calculator out

**SilverTab** · 06-18-2005, 12:52 AM

Actually it all evens out!.... My graphic here proves it:

It does have some kind of a phallic shape too...interresting huh!

**alexg** · 06-18-2005, 01:31 AM

Originally posted by Repetitive Monkey

Code:

shuffle($politically_correct_dogma);
$topic=$politically_correct_dogma[0];
$stance=array_reverse($politically_correct_dogma[0][stances_sorted]);
$title="FACT: ".$stance[0]." ".$topic;
$post.=post($stance[arguments][0],$stance[0]);
$post.=post($stance[arguments][1],$stance[0]);
$post.=post($stance[arguments][2],$stance[0]);
$post.=post($stance[arguments][3],$stance[0]);
post_all();

Possibly disturbing discussion: are negroes an inferior race?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment