I hope the only reason Hawgs Cash closed down was not 2257 because injunction coming

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • martyVP
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2004
    • 1917

    #1

    I hope the only reason Hawgs Cash closed down was not 2257 because injunction coming

    most likely we will get an injunction on this ruling.

    This is from my lawyers btw....I am not just guessing
  • pornguy
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Mar 2003
    • 62910

    #2
    I did not know that they closed down. when did that happen??
    PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

    AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
    TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

    Comment

    • riddler
      Confirmed User
      • Oct 2004
      • 3726

      #3
      bling bling

      Comment

      • martyVP
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2004
        • 1917

        #4
        Originally posted by riddler
        umm, explain? what does the injunction have to do with leaving the business?

        It most likely means that the new rules will not be enforced, how hard is that to understand?

        Comment

        • UniversalPassLorence
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2004
          • 3721

          #5
          Yes, I heard it from our lawyer, also.


          $25.00 PPS for $1.00 Trial

          Making Webmasters Money Since 1997

          ICQ: 305090349

          Comment

          • pradaboy
            sell me your banners
            • Dec 2003
            • 12931

            #6
            hmmm interesting...
            Media Buyer - Sell me your traffic!
            FREE to register domains...
            Better than 99% of the crap sold here!

            Comment

            • riddler
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2004
              • 3726

              #7
              Originally posted by martyVP
              It most likely means that the new rules will not be enforced, how hard is that to understand?
              as i edited i read your title wrong, I thought it said they was closing because of the injunction my bad !!!!

              Comment

              • martyVP
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2004
                • 1917

                #8
                Originally posted by riddler
                as i edited i read your title wrong, I thought it said they was closing because of the injunction my bad !!!!

                No problemo

                Comment

                • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                  best designer on GFY
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 30307

                  #9
                  iT WAS KINDA ODD..

                  mAKES NO SENSE.

                  Comment

                  • riddler
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2004
                    • 3726

                    #10
                    Originally posted by AlienQ
                    iT WAS KINDA ODD..

                    mAKES NO SENSE.
                    caplock stick on you ?

                    Comment

                    • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                      best designer on GFY
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 30307

                      #11
                      Yup.

                      Eheheheh

                      Comment

                      • StuartD
                        Sofa King Band
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 29903

                        #12
                        Originally posted by martyVP
                        It most likely means that the new rules will not be enforced, how hard is that to understand?
                        Well, the injunction doesn't mean that ALL of the new rules won't be enforced.... most likely the "vague" and/or rules that cause an unreasonable burden will changed or removed.... otherwise I wouldn't expect the new law to just go away.
                        This is me on facebook
                        This is me on twitter

                        Comment

                        • AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE
                          best designer on GFY
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 30307

                          #13
                          Originally posted by NichePay - StuartD
                          Well, the injunction doesn't mean that ALL of the new rules won't be enforced.... most likely the "vague" and/or rules that cause an unreasonable burden will changed or removed.... otherwise I wouldn't expect the new law to just go away.
                          Translation, yes 2257 will updated however it will be effectively castrated?

                          Comment

                          • riddler
                            Confirmed User
                            • Oct 2004
                            • 3726

                            #14
                            Originally posted by NichePay - StuartD
                            Well, the injunction doesn't mean that ALL of the new rules won't be enforced.... most likely the "vague" and/or rules that cause an unreasonable burden will changed or removed.... otherwise I wouldn't expect the new law to just go away.
                            if the secondary producer part gets dropped that will be a fucking shit load of trouble off sponsors chests.

                            Comment

                            • Pipecrew
                              Master of Gfy.com
                              • Feb 2002
                              • 14888

                              #15
                              Originally posted by NichePay - StuartD
                              Well, the injunction doesn't mean that ALL of the new rules won't be enforced.... most likely the "vague" and/or rules that cause an unreasonable burden will changed or removed.... otherwise I wouldn't expect the new law to just go away.
                              It is truly scary how many people are not and have not been prepared for this.. You seriously should not be in business if you did not have a plan for this, banking on an injunction that may or may not happen, is very risky in my opinion.

                              Comment

                              • StuartD
                                Sofa King Band
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 29903

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Pipecrew
                                It is truly scary how many people are not and have not been prepared for this.. You seriously should not be in business if you did not have a plan for this, banking on an injunction that may or may not happen, is very risky in my opinion.
                                Agreed... in this case, it's better to be careful than hopeful.
                                This is me on facebook
                                This is me on twitter

                                Comment

                                • Peaches
                                  Old broad
                                  • Oct 2002
                                  • 13933

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Pipecrew
                                  It is truly scary how many people are not and have not been prepared for this.. You seriously should not be in business if you did not have a plan for this, banking on an injunction that may or may not happen, is very risky in my opinion.
                                  Who's to say closing wasn't "the plan"? I know if I had a small program and it was going to take 100's of man hours to track down info I'd be shutting it down and starting over again. I removed all the content from my free sites and will be buying new content. That will take substantially less time and money than getting full 2257 from all the content providers I've purchased from over the past 7+ years, cross referencing the info, having my home address as a record keeper, etc.

                                  Comment

                                  • WiredGuy
                                    Pounding Googlebot
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 34516

                                    #18
                                    Shutting down is a viable option if you consider the amount of time/resources it might take to become fully compliant. Especially if you own another program which is already compliant.

                                    WG
                                    I play with Google.

                                    Comment

                                    • Stephen
                                      Consigliere
                                      • Feb 2003
                                      • 1771

                                      #19
                                      Citing 2257 Problems, HawgsCash Shuts Down

                                      Adult affiliate program HawgsCash has announced that it is shutting down due to the new 2257 regulations. The company has recommended that affiliates remove all free content and banners it distributed because the implied licenses on the material will be rescinded on June 20.

                                      FULL REPORT > http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9173

                                      Comment

                                      • Pipecrew
                                        Master of Gfy.com
                                        • Feb 2002
                                        • 14888

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Peaches
                                        Who's to say closing wasn't "the plan"? I know if I had a small program and it was going to take 100's of man hours to track down info I'd be shutting it down and starting over again. I removed all the content from my free sites and will be buying new content. That will take substantially less time and money than getting full 2257 from all the content providers I've purchased from over the past 7+ years, cross referencing the info, having my home address as a record keeper, etc.
                                        It's more like a reality check, if you are closing down, you are basically saying "I would be completely fucked if the Gov came knocking at my door" in reality, you should of ALWAYS been compliant incase they came knocking a year ago and wanted to do a records check..

                                        Comment

                                        • Thomas N
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Aug 2001
                                          • 973

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by WiredGuy
                                          Shutting down is a viable option if you consider the amount of time/resources it might take to become fully compliant. Especially if you own another program which is already compliant.

                                          WG
                                          DOES hawgscash own another program that is already compliant?

                                          Comment

                                          • $tandaman
                                            Pimping 8EZ
                                            • Jun 2001
                                            • 3530

                                            #22
                                            they are not really closing down, they forwarded their traffic to another program of theirs.. so.. it's not that bad
                                            CentroProfits.com - Make money with 3000+ Models!
                                            ModelCentro.com - Multiple award winning hosted CMS designed to run solo model sites, with affiliate program built in. Launch your model site in 24 hrs or less!
                                            FanCentro.com - Premium social network for SWs & Fans!

                                            Comment

                                            • Alky
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Apr 2002
                                              • 5651

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by SwordFish
                                              DOES hawgscash own another program that is already compliant?
                                              yes Adult Players Club

                                              Comment

                                              • GatorB
                                                The Demon & 12clicks
                                                • Oct 2001
                                                • 18208

                                                #24
                                                I'll beeive and injunction is coming when one actually does. And even so doesn't mean the DOJ can't appeal that to a higher court.

                                                Comment

                                                • WiredGuy
                                                  Pounding Googlebot
                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                  • 34516

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by SwordFish
                                                  DOES hawgscash own another program that is already compliant?
                                                  Yes, APC.
                                                  WG
                                                  I play with Google.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Thomas N
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Aug 2001
                                                    • 973

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by WiredGuy
                                                    Yes, APC.
                                                    WG
                                                    Ah ok, thanks.

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...