http://www.phenomenamagazine.com/0/e...id=80&sub_id=0
Conspiracy News
Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And `Inside Job`
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dateline: Wednesday, June 15, 2005
By: STUART MILLER
By: News Editor
Source: arcticbeacon
This just won?t lie down and die. Is it the shock of the disaster and a kind of arrogance that presumes that it couldn?t possibly happen ?here? because this is America or, is there a real perception that it could only have happened here with help?
?A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.
Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.
"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," said Reynolds this week from his offices at Texas A&M. "If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.?
3 comment(s), 1 page(s), showing page: 1 [ 1 ]
sort: [ descending ]
Conspiracy News
Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And `Inside Job`
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dateline: Wednesday, June 15, 2005
By: STUART MILLER
By: News Editor
Source: arcticbeacon
This just won?t lie down and die. Is it the shock of the disaster and a kind of arrogance that presumes that it couldn?t possibly happen ?here? because this is America or, is there a real perception that it could only have happened here with help?
?A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling," said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX.
Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it's 'next to impossible' that 19 Arab Terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11.
"It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7," said Reynolds this week from his offices at Texas A&M. "If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.?
3 comment(s), 1 page(s), showing page: 1 [ 1 ]
sort: [ descending ]
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
Comment