Pharmacueticals Hid Cancer Risk of Diabetes Drug - Fined $6 Billion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #1

    Pharmacueticals Hid Cancer Risk of Diabetes Drug - Fined $6 Billion

    They literally make a killing from their Cancer drugs, that's why they are trying to spread it


    Japan's Takeda Pharmaceutical hit with $6bn Actos damages bill
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26933770

    "A US jury in Louisiana has ordered Japanese firm Takeda Pharmaceutical to pay $6bn (£3.6bn) in punitive damages, over claims it was hiding cancer risks associated with diabetes drug Actos.

    US firm Eli Lilly, a co-defendant in the case, has been ordered to pay $3bn in punitive damages. "

    Continued http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26933770
    Last edited by wehateporn; 04-08-2014, 05:47 AM.
  • ~Ray
    visit hardlinks.org
    • Jun 2003
    • 18361

    #2
    fucked up pharma
    Adult Backlinks for Adult Websites - Testimonials Available

    Comment

    • Tom_PM
      Porn Meister
      • Feb 2005
      • 16443

      #3
      supplies
      43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

      Comment

      • Harmon
        ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ)
        • Mar 2004
        • 20012

        #4
        cool story bro
        [email protected]

        Comment

        • crockett
          in a van by the river
          • May 2003
          • 76818

          #5
          So are any of the board members or perhaps the CEO gonna take a self inflicted sword to the gut over this?
          In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

          Comment

          • CurrentlySober
            Too lazy to wipe my ass
            • Aug 2002
            • 38983

            #6
            i cant a4d a pharm...
            ️ ️

            Comment

            • Black All Through
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2010
              • 2078

              #7
              Originally posted by crockett
              So are any of the board members or perhaps the CEO gonna take a self inflicted sword to the gut over this?
              I'm diabetic, I find the article interesting, even if I have never used this drug, thanks for sharing
              I want to buy contextual links on quality blogs
              For both Adult and mainstream niche - Small to massive packages

              Comment

              • crockett
                in a van by the river
                • May 2003
                • 76818

                #8
                Originally posted by Black All Through
                I'm diabetic, I find the article interesting, even if I have never used this drug, thanks for sharing
                The problem is, they make these drugs and test them for the required amount of time then send them out into the wild. Usually there is no "long" term testing, so it might be ok for use age for a year or two. However these drugs aren't really meant just for a year or two as the pharma companies want rebills to last till the user dies.

                You take this shit for 5 years or 10 years and then it's gonna fuck something up. I somewhat believe this is why the pharma companies routinely discontinue drugs and reissue them slightly changed with a new name. This way they can continue selling the same thing under a new name to lessen their liability risk for the damage long term medication is certainly toning to do.
                In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                Comment

                Working...