First off, thanks for replying so I can clarify things. I put some quotes below my final answer that I mentioned in my reply.
Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
...
Where are you pulling this "2 year" time limit out of? Thin air? Your ass? Are you saying this legal time limit is the same everywhere in the world? C'mon now. I know of no such time limit.
|
I tried finding the "2 year" thing I mentioned, but I couldn't locate it again. What I was trying to say is that after a certain time period of not taking action (after knowing about something) then it is usually deemed as accepted. Silence denotes acceptance, at least in Robert's Rules. Read further, and my thoughts will be more clear..
Quote:
...
Bottom line is, you can't argue with what is right and what is wrong. The original designer deserves to be paid, no question about it. No courT in any country would argue with that.
|
I agree with you fully. You can't argue what is right or wrong. And no court anywhere would argue against it. The problem here is whether in this situation Hungryman owes anything to anyone.
Sly_RJ was the first person to bring logic into this thread. You need to know first off if money was to be paid, and second, who it would be paid to. The fact that BuckNaked asked Amputate to do a design for Hungryman (to get him 'the fuck away from me') is basically a pay-off on BuckNaked's part. As vidvicious said, that would have been taken care of when XXXdesigngroup.com was dissolved. The fact that BuckNaked and Amputate both laughed at the fact that it was an inside joke, and that BuckNaked didn't want anything said because he didn't want to start any trouble with his job showed that they both knew it was a design that was completed by Amputate, and it seems to be a 'favor' from BuckNaked from Amputate, which BuckNaked gave to Hungryman to get him off of his ass.
I know this is chunky, and I'm in the middle of cooking supper.
Amputate, I am not taking sides, I am just trying to figure out the situation for myself. I do feel as though Hungryman is the wrong person to be asking money for. You did the design and kept quiet about doing the design for BuckNaked/Duane/Pensfan as a favor, and that's great, and it was a great design, though I think you're trying to crack the wrong egg. I'm not even sure there is an egg that should be cracked.
BuckNaked, I understand you had problems with Hungryman, and I'm sure I don't know to what extent, though you didn't bring any proof saying that Hungryman owed Amputate, or you, any money for the design. Oh, you also mentioned a whole lot of defaming things with no solid evidence, as evidence (or actually just to defame Hungryman), which was pointless for Amputate's situation.
If there are holes or something you don't find clear, then reply and state speficially what you don't find clear.. maybe I messed up my argument, maybe it is faulty, just don't say something pointless like "You're wrong! *middle finger*"
Cheers,
Matt
Quote:
Originally posted by BuckNaked
Finally I got tired of it and let him do his own thing, however he didn't have a design site, a domain name or anything, so I was doing stuff with amp, and asked amp to do a site for hungryman so he would get the fuck away from me. Amp did a great design, and then all hell broke loose, HM showed off the design that HE DID to amp, amp kept quiet as a favor to me because I didn't want to start any trouble with my adult.com job, so we just laughed at the inside joke.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by vidvicious
Duane/Pensfran seems to be the person for whom you worked for, Since that is whom we got that design from. (XXXdesisgngroup.com) You're grevence is with Pensfran and not Hungryman nor paysitedesign.com. You have made some serious accusations here. We never have hired you or even commissioned you to do any work for us. If any moneys are owed to you they are owed to you by Pensfan not us. We cleared our bussiness with him when XXXdesigngroup.com was desolved.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sly_RJ
The real question is who Amp did the work for. Amp was saying earlier on he did it for Hungry, yet Vid is saying the design was purchased from Pensfan and Amp did the work for Pensfan. Nobody seems to be refuting the second claim, as of yet, so it looks to me like that's what happened.
If that IS what happened. All of this is crazy. Amp should have said, hey, Pensfan never paid me for your design, let's get this handled.
...
Who knows. Just a lot of flaming and siding. There are little facts involved. I have no doubt that Amp didn't get paid. Just wondering WHO was supposed to pay him.
|