2257 needed, yes or no?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • After Shock Media
    It's coming look busy
    • Mar 2001
    • 35299

    #1

    2257 needed, yes or no?




    2257 needed for this, yes or no?
    (for those that do thumb tgps and such kind of important)

    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
  • sonofsam
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Dec 2004
    • 18648

    #2
    it's not sexually explicit... clearly the girl was naughty and is getting punished for it... now... HOW could punishment be sexually appealing?
    I like turtles.

    Comment

    • NTSS
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2005
      • 5688

      #3
      Don't know?...touching?
      ICQ: 150-803-430
      Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

      Comment

      • After Shock Media
        It's coming look busy
        • Mar 2001
        • 35299

        #4
        Originally posted by NTSS
        Don't know?...touching?
        I am going with yes for another reason.

        [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

        Comment

        • wimpy
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2003
          • 607

          #5
          I would, for two reasons. Schoolgirl outfit implies underage, and spanking is s&m.
          Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote: "Every man has reminiscences which he would not tell to everyone but only his friends. He has other matters in his mind which he would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself, and that in secret. But there are other things which a man is afraid to tell even to himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away in his mind."

          icq 8243657

          Comment

          • After Shock Media
            It's coming look busy
            • Mar 2001
            • 35299

            #6
            Originally posted by wimpy
            I would, for two reasons. Schoolgirl outfit implies underage, and spanking is s&m.
            I do not think a school uniform makes it required. Nowhere do we have a dress code or any rules about having something imply they are underage in the regs.
            Though the S/M rule would require compliance as per the regs.

            Now how many times has hollywood in the past used spankings in movies? Yes every one from Elvis to John Wayne laid the butt smacks down on naughty girls. Think they will get away with it again with out compliance of title 18, or will the DOJ just go after us smut peddles envoking selective prosecution?

            [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

            Comment

            • wimpy
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2003
              • 607

              #7
              Originally posted by After Shock Media
              I do not think a school uniform makes it required. Nowhere do we have a dress code or any rules about having something imply they are underage in the regs.
              Though the S/M rule would require compliance as per the regs.

              Now how many times has hollywood in the past used spankings in movies? Yes every one from Elvis to John Wayne laid the butt smacks down on naughty girls. Think they will get away with it again with out compliance of title 18, or will the DOJ just go after us smut peddles envoking selective prosecution?
              I didn't say the outfit made it required, only wise.

              I doubt they'll go after hollywood. 2257 is the Right trying to shut us down.
              Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote: "Every man has reminiscences which he would not tell to everyone but only his friends. He has other matters in his mind which he would not reveal even to his friends, but only to himself, and that in secret. But there are other things which a man is afraid to tell even to himself, and every decent man has a number of such things stored away in his mind."

              icq 8243657

              Comment

              Working...