NPR Washington is interviewing me about .xxx, this should be interesting...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PhillipB
    Just a Simple Carpenter
    • May 2003
    • 1338

    #1

    NPR Washington is interviewing me about .xxx, this should be interesting...

    Going to be on the air in the government's own backyard Monday. What message should I send to those listening?
  • wallst
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2004
    • 1621

    #2
    Earl Miller Cash
    20th Congress

    Comment

    • Aly
      President, ePufferProfits
      • Dec 2004
      • 1881

      #3
      Originally posted by wallst
      .

      .
      Aly's ICQ: 51504163 . Aly's Email: [email protected]

      Comment

      • wallst
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2004
        • 1621

        #4
        ok, you asked for my message

        Earl Miller Cash
        20th Congress

        Comment

        • PhillipB
          Just a Simple Carpenter
          • May 2003
          • 1338

          #5
          Originally posted by wallst
          ok, you asked for my message

          haha, nice!

          Comment

          • pussyluver
            Clueless OleMan
            • Mar 2003
            • 11009

            #6
            Originally posted by APN Philip
            Going to be on the air in the government's own backyard Monday. What message should I send to those listening?
            Read the 1st and 14th amendment to the US Constiution. .xxx really shouldn't fly.

            Practical issues is rights over key money URLs such as adult.com (adult.xxx) etc. who gets it?? Who gets pussy.xxx?

            Waste of time, because the Supreme Court will prolly knock it down...

            The behind the scenes BS that as already occoured with respect to ASACP etc.

            Comment

            • PhillipB
              Just a Simple Carpenter
              • May 2003
              • 1338

              #7
              Good points, I will definitely ellaborate on those.

              Comment

              • FilthyRob
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2004
                • 6741

                #8
                I hope this never passes
                AKA - Clubsexy

                Comment

                • polish_aristocrat
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 40377

                  #9
                  Originally posted by APN Philip
                  Good points, I will definitely ellaborate on those.
                  read Lensmans and Mike Hawks threads on the .xxx extensions
                  I don't use ICQ anymore.

                  Comment

                  • polish_aristocrat
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 40377

                    #10
                    Originally posted by FilthyRob
                    I hope this never passes
                    it almost already passed
                    I don't use ICQ anymore.

                    Comment

                    • clickhappy
                      Confirmed User
                      • Mar 2004
                      • 4027

                      #11
                      can you slip in a quickie mention on 2257 and models losing their privacy?

                      Comment

                      • PhillipB
                        Just a Simple Carpenter
                        • May 2003
                        • 1338

                        #12
                        Originally posted by clickhappy
                        can you slip in a quickie mention on 2257 and models losing their privacy?
                        I sure will. I've already expressed my desire to speak a little about 2257 and the producer was receptive.

                        Comment

                        • AmigoPorn
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 21583

                          #13
                          Are those interviews live or pre-recorded? I listen to NPR every day.
                          ICQ: 267899523


                          Comment

                          • tony299
                            lurker
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 57021

                            #14
                            you should read Connors article

                            Comment

                            • PhillipB
                              Just a Simple Carpenter
                              • May 2003
                              • 1338

                              #15
                              Originally posted by AmigoPorn
                              Are those interviews live or pre-recorded? I listen to NPR every day.
                              live, check it out Monday, 10am PST.

                              Comment

                              • PhillipB
                                Just a Simple Carpenter
                                • May 2003
                                • 1338

                                #16
                                Originally posted by tony404
                                you should read Connors article
                                I have and his views coincide with mine.

                                Comment

                                • NTSS
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Mar 2005
                                  • 5688

                                  #17
                                  Tell em' we're pissed!
                                  ICQ: 150-803-430
                                  Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

                                  Comment

                                  • 2HousePlague
                                    CURATOR
                                    • Jul 2004
                                    • 14572

                                    #18
                                    Remind them how successful we have ALREADY been at keeping minors out of porn. When we simply object to 2257, it makes it seem to those looking in from the outside that we've been negligent or insufficient, and that a governmental/legislative intervention was NECESSARY -- it was not, as we can readily show.

                                    I think if we always start by describing how 2257 is UNNECESSARY, and let folks know that we're proud of our industry's age enforcement record, it will make people wonder -- "Then, why was this law passed?" -- which is exactly what we want --


                                    j-
                                    tada!

                                    Comment

                                    Working...