And are applying the new rule to All......
We might Just as well start a list!
Lightspeedcash
Pineapplepink
Karups Sites
Who will be next?
We might Just as well start a list!
Lightspeedcash
Pineapplepink
Karups Sites
Who will be next?
-
-
I wouldn't mind a response here from any of you guys...
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=477931Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details. -
Donny's MoneyComment
-
I'd quit the business before I'd put the lives of the people that helped to build it at stake..Comment
-
PimpDust will not be giving out id's. If you're using any hardcore banners or content, remove it and replace it with soft content.
If anyone needs any softer content, hit me up on icq.
- PornAddict
icq: 50236184Comment
-
Lightspeedcash
Pineapplepink
Karups Sites
Donny's Money
PornAddictComment
-
There are probably more programs that are not giving out anything to affiliates then there are that will.
I can appreciate all the privacy points, I really can. What are we to do but to stop the traffic flow to ones who aren't offering subtle "softer" content to replace on the galleries? I for one have over 2000 pic and movie galleries I am reviewing and redirecting. Started this today and removed about 30 so far.AKA - ClubsexyComment
-
first hardcore program to see do thisOriginally posted by PornAddictComment
-
To be honest, we're an EXTREMELY small program. We only deal with a handful of sign-ups a day as it is so I don't think it's going to affect us the way it would a larger company. We certainly have a lot of growing to do.
Also... even though we're primarily a hardcore program, I have a good collection of softer pics and solo videos that I shot as filler to the hardcore so affiliates will still have material... just not with cocks and cum.
Personally, I think using less hardcore content can be an advantage with a little creative marketing. Not sure if we'll just get passed over by affiliates looking to push new sites but I'm not worried. We'll just take it day by day and see how this whole thing plays out.
- PornAddictComment
-
Good night bump...Comment
-
Pretty much everyone!
Comment
-
-
Very smart congratsOriginally posted by PornAddict
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
Sundance is no longer relevant according to the new regs. that means affiliates need the model IDs RETROACTIVELY or they can go to prison. it's right there in the regs.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by chadglniThe commentary refers to section 2257(f) in the event that the secondary producers are unable to produce the complete records for all content that they ever published. Section 2257(f) is the part of the law that basically says, 'failure to maintain the required records is a crime!'the D.C. Circuit, in American Library
Ass'n v. Reno, had upheld the requirement that secondary producers
maintain records. The Department is not responsible if secondary
producers chose to rely on the Tenth Circuit's holding in Sundance and
not to maintain records while ignoring the D.C. Circuit's holding in
American Library Ass'n v. Reno. A prudent secondary producer would have
continued to secure copies of the records from primary producers after
July 3, 1995. If those records, which are statutorily required, are not
currently available, then the commenters are correct that they will be
required to comply with the requirements of all applicable laws,
including section 2257(f). They are incorrect, however, to claim that
this would result in an impermissible burden on free speech. As the
D.C. Circuit held, the government has a compelling state interest in
protecting children from sexual exploitation. If the producers (primary
and secondary) of sexually explicit depictions cannot document that
children were not used for the production of the sexually explicit
depictions, then they must take whatever appropriate actions are
warranted to comply with the child exploitation, obscenity, and record-
keeping statutes. The First Amendment is not offended by making it
unlawful knowingly to fail or refuse to comply with the record-keeping
or labeling provisions of this valid statute.Comment
-
Originally posted by Scootermuze
I take it you are referring to the models?ICQ: 150-803-430
Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)netComment
-
Evil Genious Cash won't give out IDs either
I just received an email from themComment
Comment