Damn, some of you guys are really just a bunch of sheep. Sleazydream's bestiality..

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nastyking
    • Nov 2002
    • 2174

    #101
    Originally posted by SleazyDream
    umm, no you proved that i never changed the banner. which i didn't
    Wrong. I proved that Cybertainment (KinkyCeline) did NOT change the banner.

    I prepared a Step-by-Step Guide for you.

    1.) Go to
    http://web-sniffer.net/?url=http%3A%...%2Fbanner2.jpg

    This IP is owned by Cybertainment (aka KinkyCeline) - This was the banner that was displayed on your site.

    2.) Look for Last-Modified on the Page
    Last-Modified: Mon, 23 May 2005 05:38:47 GMT

    This means that the banner was last changed on 23 May 2005 by KinkyCeline.

    => KinkyCeline did NOT change the banner => You lied to GFY ...

    Q.E.D.

    Comment

    • SleazyDream
      I'm here for SPORT
      • Jul 2001
      • 41470

      #102
      Originally posted by nastyking
      Wrong. I proved that Cybertainment (KinkyCeline) did NOT change the banner.

      I prepared a Step-by-Step Guide for you.

      1.) Go to
      http://web-sniffer.net/?url=http%3A%...%2Fbanner2.jpg

      This IP is owned by Cybertainment (aka KinkyCeline) - This was the banner that was displayed on your site.

      2.) Look for Last-Modified on the Page
      Last-Modified: Mon, 23 May 2005 05:38:47 GMT

      This means that the banner was last changed on 23 May 2005 by KinkyCeline.

      => KinkyCeline did NOT change the banner => You lied to GFY ...

      Q.E.D.

      ummm, actually that makes sense as that ad campaign went into effect june 1 - it's automated and put into the sytem way before that - meaning it would have been approved probally around the 20th or so. it was probally changed on their server on the 23 or whenever you say so that we believe we were linking to the banner we approved and then suddenly when it went live on the 1st (when banners change) the bad banner went in and cybercat or I were none the wiser till this exploded on GFY on the 1st.


      think about it - SERIOUSLY - if it was live on my site from the 23rd SOMEONE - like you - would have caught it and brought it to the masses attention.

      i'm under a microscope in my daily transactions from you trolls - no way could i have had a beast banner on my site form the 23rd without you guys noticing. you caught it on the 1st - when the banners changed and updated
      This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

      Now read without the word dog.

      Comment

      • SleazyDream
        I'm here for SPORT
        • Jul 2001
        • 41470

        #103
        and i'm really happy you trolls DID catch the banner when you did and i THANK YOU for watching soo close and monitaring my site so.

        i really appreaicte it. Helps me to keep a cleaner site.


        This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

        Now read without the word dog.

        Comment

        • GiantGnome
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2004
          • 4344

          #104
          Originally posted by SleazyDream
          and i'm really happy you trolls DID catch the banner when you did and i THANK YOU for watching soo close and monitaring my site so.

          i really appreaicte it. Helps me to keep a cleaner site.


          NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-Darth Vader

          Comment

          • nastyking
            • Nov 2002
            • 2174

            #105
            Originally posted by SleazyDream
            and i'm really happy you trolls DID catch the banner when you did and i THANK YOU for watching soo close and monitaring my site so.

            i really appreaicte it. Helps me to keep a cleaner site.


            Comment

            • Brujah
              Beer Money Baron
              • Jan 2001
              • 22157

              #106
              Why is the banner an issue at all ? The SITE was approved wasn't it ? Isn't it the SITE that is in question here also ? Or was the SITE changed after it was approved too ?

              Comment

              • nastyking
                • Nov 2002
                • 2174

                #107
                Originally posted by SleazyDream
                no way could i have had a beast banner on my site form the 23rd without you guys noticing. you caught it on the 1st - when the banners changed and updated
                i never claimed you had it since 23rd may.

                you had it since 1st june ( 8 days after the banner was uploaded to the server). the banner was never changed after it has been uploaded though ...

                Comment

                • nastyking
                  • Nov 2002
                  • 2174

                  #108
                  Originally posted by Brujah
                  Why is the banner an issue at all ? The SITE was approved wasn't it ? Isn't it the SITE that is in question here also ? Or was the SITE changed after it was approved too ?
                  Yea, of course the site was approved.

                  But SleazyDream claims that both the site and banner were changed (pure bullshit) ...

                  When he told us that lie, he didn't think about Last-Modified though ...

                  This clearly uncovered his lie, proofing that SleazyDream knowingly accepted Bestiality on his site ...

                  Comment

                  • SleazyDream
                    I'm here for SPORT
                    • Jul 2001
                    • 41470

                    #109
                    Originally posted by nastyking
                    i never claimed you had it since 23rd may.

                    you had it since 1st june ( 8 days after the banner was uploaded to the server). the banner was never changed after it has been uploaded though ...
                    god you're going in circles here. we would not have knowingly approved a beast banner. even in the form sent out to my clients it stats no beast stuff - has for years.

                    i'm curious- who exactly ARE you? do you have the guts to say?
                    This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

                    Now read without the word dog.

                    Comment

                    • SleazyDream
                      I'm here for SPORT
                      • Jul 2001
                      • 41470

                      #110
                      Originally posted by Brujah
                      Why is the banner an issue at all ? The SITE was approved wasn't it ? Isn't it the SITE that is in question here also ? Or was the SITE changed after it was approved too ?
                      yeah - obviously sites can NEVER be changed. lol
                      This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

                      Now read without the word dog.

                      Comment

                      • Brujah
                        Beer Money Baron
                        • Jan 2001
                        • 22157

                        #111
                        Originally posted by SleazyDream
                        yeah - obviously sites can NEVER be changed. lol
                        That's what I was wondering. Thanks for clearing that up.

                        So then; Sleazydream and Cybercat say they were duped, and the site being advertised was changed after it was approved.

                        Got it.

                        Comment

                        • NoCarrier
                          We need more free porn
                          • Mar 2002
                          • 16356

                          #112
                          Originally posted by Brujah
                          That's what I was wondering. Thanks for clearing that up.

                          So then; Sleazydream and Cybercat say they were duped, and the site being advertised was changed after it was approved.

                          Got it.
                          Yeah, especially with the fact that archive.org is clearly proving that the landing page has never been changed in two years. Amazing that he's still using the "they changed the landing page" bullshit excuse.

                          Comment

                          • opflix
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 1428

                            #113
                            ummmmm.... i see why you are arguing/fighting this SD... you are KNOWINGLY profiting from a company that produces & distributes bestiality. its that simple. shouldn't the canadian mounties or somethin be up in dat ass for that?




                            ...
                            Last edited by opflix; 06-05-2005, 04:37 PM.
                            Social Escrow - Buying & Selling Accounts? Contact Me | Social Escrow IG

                            Comment

                            • WarChild
                              Let slip the dogs of war.
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 17263

                              #114
                              Originally posted by opflix
                              ummmmm.... i see why you are arguing/fighting this SD... you are KNOWINGLY profiting from a company that produces & distributes bestiality. its that simple. shouldn't the canadian mounties or somethin be up in dat ass for that?




                              ...
                              Well it did take well over 24 hours to have it removed. It wasn't exactly a priority for Sleazy to stop pushing the beast.
                              .

                              Comment

                              Working...