Shit, it's almost like thehun has some hidden agenda in posting bad galleries. Take a gander at this gem: http://www.biz4a.com/freesex/tgp/07/ from hun today for example.
One would think if b/c it's so hard to get listed that the galleries would all be quite superb, yet it's as if a 1000 monkeys at a 1000 computers do the selection process. Some are great galleries, some are shit.
Best advice so far was to submit only tweaked and tested galleries to thehun. That was common sense and sage all in one.
Shit, it's almost like thehun has some hidden agenda in posting bad galleries. Take a gander at this gem: http://www.biz4a.com/freesex/tgp/07/ from hun today for example.
One would think if b/c it's so hard to get listed that the galleries would all be quite superb, yet it's as if a 1000 monkeys at a 1000 computers do the selection process. Some are great galleries, some are shit.
Best advice so far was to submit only tweaked and tested galleries to thehun. That was common sense and sage all in one.
I don't really remeber mentioning content vs design. But now that you mention it, I'd say that of course you're right; surfers are after content that they think is hot, that's true inarguably, and I wouldn't ever say otherwise.
Good design, in my opinion, is something you add to great content. Design can reassure the surfer that the site is more legit and not a scam. I think somewhere in the surfer's head a really well designed gallery means that if they whip out the credit card they really will get access to something cool vice having their credit card number taped up in a subway in Malaysia.
well, its been said in this thread already, but that gallery sucks.
when i first saw it, i just saw a girl with a really bad looking pussy (hey, im just being honest!) and you content showed nothing about female ejaculation. you have to tease the surfer with what you're selling. by the look of your gallery, it would appear that you were promoting blondes or milfs or big pussys....but certainly not female ejacualtion.
anyways, i clicked through your sponsor (to see maybe there were errors in that) and it took about 10 seconds to load and im on broadband, imagine that on dial-up.
and (this has also been mentioned) but you should have tested out (1) that content and (2) that gallery design on other smaller tgps (3) the niche and (4) that sponsor. either you're a newbie or you are just new at the TGP game, either way, pick up the pointers that were given to you in this thread and try again.
Need a Text Writer?
Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories ICQ: 397892500
Good design, in my opinion, is something you add to great content. Design can reassure the surfer that the site is more legit and not a scam. I think somewhere in the surfer's head a really well designed gallery means that if they whip out the credit card they really will get access to something cool vice having their credit card number taped up in a subway in Malaysia.
You give surfers too much credit. They don't think, period. In fact I do not want a surfer that thinks too much. If surfers went for pretty design would the hun be the #1 porn site out there?
now see it this way: you had 3500+ hits to your sponsor, and only 1 signup. That means 3500 people tried your sponsor and for one reason, they didn't signup. Were they scrubbed too hard? Maybe the sponsor failed? I told you about the overexposed content before, if surfers see those squirting sets ad nauseam, it's not a surprise they don't signup. Maybe you'd try another sponsor, better if not overexposed
that gallery must not have set the surfers up to anticipate what your sponsor offers. i am no wizard, but with one exception, i can always expect at least 5 sales from thehun on day one of a gallery...
Damn! The art from I'm Live has been around awhile. Worn-out??? Wonder if that made a difference?
you are sooo damn right! and now when I look at the content: the girl's left nipple is bigger than the right one!!! Wonder if that made a difference...
Comment