Say you publish a picture of a girl groping her own tits and she has her o face on. Could it be argued she was masturbating?
If it can be argued, then, that masturbation only exists in your head as a projection of your own thoughts. She could as well be calling her cat.
An act of masturbation must be also explicit, according to the defintions used by the new regulations. If you don't see a pussy or you don't see a hand reaching a pussy, or dildo or anything that can unequivocally demonstrate an act of 'masturbation', then it may well not exist.
But I am not a lawyer.
If it can be argued, then, that masturbation only exists in your head as a projection of your own thoughts. She could as well be calling her cat.
An act of masturbation must be also explicit, according to the defintions used by the new regulations. If you don't see a pussy or you don't see a hand reaching a pussy, or dildo or anything that can unequivocally demonstrate an act of 'masturbation', then it may well not exist.
But I am not a lawyer.

Comment