do you have content shot by me, 2257?

Out of curiosity, did the models consent in writing to have their ID info distributed in the manner you are proposing?

-Dino

That does bring up a good point. I know for my release I don't think I have anything in there that would cover that. I guess if this thing goes into action, we will all need some text that would cover us when we violate the models privacy and put her at risk for various crimes. Otherwise when she gets goes through identity theft or gets stalked (or worse), we can not be held responsible. Ugh. Sad days these are.

Should Scare ALL Talent

Sixty-two commenters commented that revealing personal information
of performers, for example, in the form of their addresses on drivers'
licenses used as identification documents in compliance with this
regulation, is an invasion of performers' privacy and could lead to
identity theft or violent crimes.

Forty commenters commented that including the names and addresses of businesses where the records at issue are located would similarly lead to crimes against those businesses.

The Department declines to adopt these comments. While the Department is certainly concerned about possible crimes against performers and businesses that employ them, the necessity of maintaining these records to ensure that children are not exploited outweighs these concerns.

Furthermore, specifically regarding personal information about performers required to be provided to primary producers, the Department notes that the information required is no different from that required by other forms of employee or business records, such as social security numbers and dates of birth required for tax reporting purposes, emergency contact numbers in case of health problems, or addresses used to transmit paychecks. Regarding
information about producers, such as their physical location, that
those producers must include in their statements, the Department notes
that producers are already required, under the current Part 75
regulations, to include that information.

Finally, regarding personal information about performers that must be transmitted to secondary producers, the Department again notes, first, that such information is already required by the current Part 75 regulations, and, second, that none of the commenters presented any evidence that a hypothetically possible crime, such as the stalking of a performer, was in any way tied to the dissemination of the information about a performer provided
to a producer in compliance with Part 75.