SEO style sites are immune from 2257 laws... don't wait forever to learn it! - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#51

05-29-2005, 07:06 PM

Originally posted by jojojo

??? I meant you can't take down your pics because they are explicit and thats what tgps/mgps want from you... you can't just email all the mgps you submit to and say "I've removed all the explicit content from my galleries... now its nothing but non explicit ads to the paysite"

hell.. I must be very SLOW!! :-) Basically... if I get it right this time round, you are suggesting you knowingly submit to tgp's and then remove image linkage?

Sounds too smart ass for me... I prefer to do as I say and operate outside the US and ingore their laws.

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
Juicy D. Links

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 122992
Share

Post
#52

05-29-2005, 07:06 PM

50.....................
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#53

05-29-2005, 07:09 PM

Originally posted by Chimmy

Wow...this has my vote for most frustrating thread of the day. Granted, jojojo didn't explain the "explicit image" issues very well...but still, are the rest of you that daft that you really couldn't understand what he was "trying" to say.

No offence to jojojo.. but if he can't explain the "explcit image" shit - he needs some more fundamental stuff sorted out first before bothering about SEO.

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#54

05-29-2005, 07:10 PM

Originally posted by Webby

hell.. I must be very SLOW!! :-) Basically... if I get it right this time round, you are suggesting you knowingly submit to tgp's and then remove image linkage?

Sounds too smart ass for me... I prefer to do as I say and operate outside the US and ingore their laws.

O.o are u joking.... u still don't get it??

I haven't submitted to tgps/mgps in years.....

ok let me explain this one more time really slow....

IF YOU SUBMIT TO MGPS AND TGPS YOU MUST FOLLOW THEIR RULES WHICH MEANS HAVING PICS OF EXPLICIT CONTENT (DUH THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF A GALLERY)... IF YOU TRY AND REMOVE THE PICS YOU WILL BE BANNED (DUH)

If you make sites that are designed for SE's only... these sites aren't submitted to tgps and mgps therefore you are not bound by any rules... your site can be nothing but ads, text, whatever the hell you want to put on the page you can do without jeapordizing traffic.

please tell me you finally understand :|

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
radical

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 2876
Share

Post
#55

05-29-2005, 07:13 PM

Originally posted by jojojo

yet there are still people making less than $2k/mth in this business... why is that? why isnt everyone making $30,000/mth?

A whole bunch of generic information is not enough to be successful.

Simple, if certain webmasters are only making say "$2000" per month then simply their not working hard enough.

Also there is a few places on the web where there is more than a whole bunch of generic information!

Seek and ye shall find, it's that simple

ICQ: 166108967
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#56

05-29-2005, 07:15 PM

Originally posted by jojojo

O.o are u joking.... u still don't get it??

please tell me you finally understand :|

Hell.. I got an easier way!! Can I just buy ya a drink instead???

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
BlingDaddy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 6343
Share

Post
#57

05-29-2005, 07:20 PM

Originally posted by Webby

Sounds too smart ass for me... I prefer to do as I say and operate outside the US and ingore their laws.

Not to be snobby... but this is exactly the reason that the US govt is enacting this. Not accusing anyone of anything but far too many people prefer to operate "outside the US, and ignore their laws".

This has led to the permutation of CRAP.

People with this philosophy need to wake up.... where are the top 10 Search Engines located? IN THE MOTHER FUCKING US. After 2257 is in full effect the SE's will be developing filters and blocks that stop access to adult from non-compliant sites. It won't matter if your shit is on the moon... Did anyone consider that?

Every Day... Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!
Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!

The Daily Bag of Douche - Humor at it's FINEST.
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#58

05-29-2005, 07:22 PM

Originally posted by BlingDaddy

Not to be snobby... but this is exactly the reason that the US govt is enacting this. Not accusing anyone of anything but far too many people prefer to operate "outside the US, and ignore their laws".

This has led to the permutation of CRAP.

People with this philosophy need to wake up.... where are the top 10 Search Engines located? IN THE MOTHER FUCKING US. After 2257 is in full effect the SE's will be developing filters and blocks that stop access to adult from non-compliant sites. It won't matter if your shit is on the moon... Did anyone consider that?

I agree... thats why its best to use no images at all in promotion... let them join a paysite and pay some $$ if they want content...

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
Chimmy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 469
Share

Post
#59

05-29-2005, 07:22 PM

Always here to offer a helping hand....

Here's what Jojojo has been trying to say to all of you...but in my own words

Those of you who decide to continue to generate your traffic through tgp's and mgp's will need to ensure that all of your galleries are compliant with the new 2257 regs.

Not to mention that all of your galleries that you have submitted in the past, that are archived on tgp and mgp sites, will probably be illegal after June 23rd, as they will not comply to the new 2257 regs.

So, jojojo has a very good point. And here is where I think most of you are confused. He is NOT saying yoiu can make a SEO page, and leave explicit images on it, without complying to the new regs. He IS saying that with a SEO page, you don't need to include any sexually explicit images on it at all.

So, with the quickly approaching June 23rd deadline, I agree with jojojo. SEO certainly does look like a good route to go.
Comment
TheJimmy

ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 10747
Share

Post
#60

05-29-2005, 07:23 PM

Originally posted by Webby

I got a nice ebook course that normally sells for $199.95 - but got a special offer where you save $190... just $9.95! It's even got a special two page section on Google :-)

ooo, shame on you, you selling the seobook.com's book for a knockoff price?

I'll see your seobook and raise you one googlecash

Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
BlingDaddy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 6343
Share

Post
#61

05-29-2005, 07:26 PM

Originally posted by jojojo

I agree... thats why its best to use no images at all in promotion... let them join a paysite and pay some $$ if they want content...

Yeah? My consulting fee is $200 per hour. "How to make money in adult after June 23rd" will be on sale when I wake up.

Every Day... Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!
Bling Daddy's Masturbation Station!

The Daily Bag of Douche - Humor at it's FINEST.
Comment
radical

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 2876
Share

Post
#62

05-29-2005, 07:32 PM

Originally posted by Chimmy

Always here to offer a helping hand....

Here's what Jojojo has been trying to say to all of you...but in my own words

Those of you who decide to continue to generate your traffic through tgp's and mgp's will need to ensure that all of your galleries are compliant with the new 2257 regs.

Not to mention that all of your galleries that you have submitted in the past, that are archived on tgp and mgp sites, will probably be illegal after June 23rd, as they will not comply to the new 2257 regs.

So, jojojo has a very good point. And here is where I think most of you are confused. He is NOT saying yoiu can make a SEO page, and leave explicit images on it, without complying to the new regs. He IS saying that with a SEO page, you don't need to include any sexually explicit images on it at all.

So, with the quickly approaching June 23rd deadline, I agree with jojojo. SEO certainly does look like a good route to go.

Put it this way, anyone in their right mind would not use sexually explicit images on an seo page in the first place, I've never used sexually explicit images on any seo pages I've built, at the extreme maybe the odd nipple here and there, obviously some sites do display like mgp's and tgp's etc etc

Unique text based content has always been one of the outlining facts with regards to seo, many sites out there will rank high for certain keywords when they switch from a thumb based layout to text etc

ICQ: 166108967
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#63

05-29-2005, 07:39 PM

Originally posted by radical

Put it this way, anyone in their right mind would not use sexually explicit images on an seo page in the first place, I've never used sexually explicit images on any seo pages I've built, at the extreme maybe the odd nipple here and there, obviously some sites do display like mgp's and tgp's etc etc

Unique text based content has always been one of the outlining facts with regards to seo, many sites out there will rank high for certain keywords when they switch from a thumb based layout to text etc

Yes this is the whole point of why I posted... if you have any banners/images with explicit content you can take them done no problem - the main point IS that you can build sites with no explicit content and get ranked high... you don't need any content to make a boatload of $$ in SEO.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#64

05-29-2005, 08:26 PM

Originally posted by BlingDaddy

Not to be snobby... but this is exactly the reason that the US govt is enacting this. Not accusing anyone of anything but far too many people prefer to operate "outside the US, and ignore their laws".

This has led to the permutation of CRAP.

People with this philosophy need to wake up.... where are the top 10 Search Engines located? IN THE MOTHER FUCKING US. After 2257 is in full effect the SE's will be developing filters and blocks that stop access to adult from non-compliant sites. It won't matter if your shit is on the moon... Did anyone consider that?

The US govt is something that manages the US badly. It is not a govt that has *any* rights on other nations else why don't we all observe the laws of Angola?

I never did comply with any laws of the US - simply because they were not the laws I live under. But... I did comply with the principle of 2257 as it was, since this was at least an effort to protect children.. tho the enforcement to back it up has been an utter disgrace and most likely, will continue that way.

Under no circumstances is any person from another country - and one who has no servers in US territory obliged to comply with laws like this. They are irrelevant and unenforceable elsewhere and sure, will be the subject of more than one case.

Sure... the moment this current bullshit starts messing with other nations, they are not going to sit quiet and adopt the "one nation under God" bullshit.

If you don't comprehend the concept that this is a hypocritical law that in no way enhances the protection of children, (which many would be in agreement with and actually comply), but a raving idiot piece of legislation out of a perverse govt which is now abusing ideas of child protection for their own bullshit religeous/political scenarios. I pity the children in the US who are abused - they ain't got a hope - just tell em God is looking after them.

On engines... of course there is more than a fair chance the US will propose censoring them as well - it's part of the warped makeup of the current Administration. However, the net will be here long after they have gone.

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#65

05-29-2005, 08:28 PM

Originally posted by TheJimmy

ooo, shame on you, you selling the seobook.com's book for a knockoff price?

I'll see your seobook and raise you one googlecash

Suppose I gotta look guilty and apologise now?? :-)

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
TheJimmy

ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 10747
Share

Post
#66

05-29-2005, 08:51 PM

Originally posted by Webby

Suppose I gotta look guilty and apologise now?? :-)

nope, not at all information wants to be free lol...

but glad I never bought that one, can't say the same for googlecash, I acutally bought that one...but these are some interesting reviews on the seobook LOL

http://www.web-advertising-info.com/seobook/

:/

Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#67

05-29-2005, 08:58 PM

This is a bullshit thread using 2257 fear to push SEO consulting.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#68

05-29-2005, 09:10 PM

Originally posted by xxxjay

This is a bullshit thread using 2257 fear to push SEO consulting.

Since when is using fear based advertising "bullshit"?

Everyone uses this form of marketing so why is it all of sudden "bullshit"?

If someone chooses to stop submitting/dealing with hardcore/explicit content that is one less person to add to the problem isn't it? Sounds like I am helping everyone here... except people who already work the SE's themselves... so your response/attitude toward this makes sense.

Last edited by jojojo; 05-29-2005, 09:12 PM.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
WiredGuy

Pounding Googlebot

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 34516
Share

Post
#69

05-29-2005, 10:15 PM

Originally posted by fris

why would i pay some gimp 1000$ i never heard of when wiredguy does all my seo for free

Hey! I don't want people ICQ'ing me for free SEO!
WG

I play with Google.
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#70

05-29-2005, 10:46 PM

Originally posted by WiredGuy

Hey! I don't want people ICQ'ing me for free SEO!
WG

So should they email instead?

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
UniqueMovies

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 1691
Share

Post
#71

05-29-2005, 11:46 PM

Originally posted by jojojo

So should they email instead?

I sen't you an ICQ msg, but no reply.
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#72

05-29-2005, 11:52 PM

Originally posted by TheJimmy

nope, not at all information wants to be free lol...

but glad I never bought that one, can't say the same for googlecash, I acutally bought that one...but these are some interesting reviews on the seobook LOL

http://www.web-advertising-info.com/seobook/

:/

OK!.. Gotta admit something! I've never read the seobook or googlecash... but I was the biggest mug for all and every bit of software that was released relating to se promo :-)

Ya want a cupboard of se submission software going back ten years ?? It's gotta be worth antique value soon!

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#73

05-30-2005, 12:02 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

Since when is using fear based advertising "bullshit"?

Everyone uses this form of marketing so why is it all of sudden "bullshit"?

If someone chooses to stop submitting/dealing with hardcore/explicit content that is one less person to add to the problem isn't it? Sounds like I am helping everyone here... except people who already work the SE's themselves... so your response/attitude toward this makes sense.

Everybody is putting the "2257" buzzword in EVERYTHING and it is distracting from the real issue at hand. It is not very often that I will judge somebody like this, but I think it is just unethical. We need to pay attention to the real matter at hand instead of profiteering from a bad situation.

It's like being one of those ambulence chaser lawyers...very slimey.

I am hardly worried about your competition.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#74

05-30-2005, 12:17 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Everybody is putting the "2257" buzzword in EVERYTHING and it is distracting from the real issue at hand. It is not very often that I will judge somebody like this, but I think it is just unethical. We need to pay attention to the real matter at hand instead of profiteering from a bad situation.

It's like being one of those ambulence chaser lawyers...very slimey.

I am hardly worried about your competition.

You are doing the same thing pushing OCcash saying how you are 2257 complient blah blah don't act all righteous...

2257 is a shitty reality... switching your focus to SEO style sites is definitely a solution that works.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#75

05-30-2005, 12:25 AM

Just listen to WG jojojo...

There is no money to be made in SEO

I'm hoping to earn a full dollar this week off engines - but I might have to persuade some friends to signup to reach that target

But.. least my earnings are tax free...

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#76

05-30-2005, 12:26 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

You are doing the same thing pushing OCcash saying how you are 2257 complient blah blah don't act all righteous...

2257 is a shitty reality... switching your focus to SEO style sites is definitely a solution that works.

Wrong again. I never pushed OCCash off as "2257 compliant". We are in the same boat everyone else is. I made one post saying that we were aware of the issue, just so our webmasters knew that we were not sleeping on it:

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=472860

Get your facts right before you put words in my mouth.

Trying to make money off 2257 fear is like sucking the oxygen out of the room and standing there with a bag of air and charging people to breathe.

Come up with a new angle to hawk your SEO.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#77

05-30-2005, 12:43 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Wrong again. I never pushed OCCash off as "2257 compliant". We are in the same boat everyone else is. I made one post saying that we were aware of the issue, just so our webmasters knew that we were not sleeping on it:

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=472860

Get your facts right before you put words in my mouth.

Trying to make money off 2257 fear is like sucking the oxygen out of the room and standing there with a bag of air and charging people to breathe.

Come up with a new angle to hawk your SEO.

There are a lot of people in this business who are afraid of what is going to happen over the next few years with this issue...

lol you act as if I am using this 2257 to rip people off lol

2257 or not - learning SEO is something these people should do anyways and this new sketchy 2257 laws are just another reason to do it.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
WiredGuy

Pounding Googlebot

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 34516
Share

Post
#78

05-30-2005, 12:51 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

There are a lot of people in this business who are afraid of what is going to happen over the next few years with this issue...

lol you act as if I am using this 2257 to rip people off lol

2257 or not - learning SEO is something these people should do anyways and this new sketchy 2257 laws are just another reason to do it.

But the way you worded your thread seems to me a scare tactic to get people to buy your SEO tutorials/consultation. The use of 2257 and SEO have very little to do with each other, it just so happens to be a hot topic of conversation with the upcoming law going into effect in a few weeks. If you want to peddle your SEO, try doing it without scaring people into it. It will work much better in the long run.

WG

I play with Google.
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#79

05-30-2005, 12:56 AM

Originally posted by WiredGuy

But the way you worded your thread seems to me a scare tactic to get people to buy your SEO tutorials/consultation. The use of 2257 and SEO have very little to do with each other, it just so happens to be a hot topic of conversation with the upcoming law going into effect in a few weeks. If you want to peddle your SEO, try doing it without scaring people into it. It will work much better in the long run.

WG

Well put! You going to San Diego?

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
WiredGuy

Pounding Googlebot

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 34516
Share

Post
#80

05-30-2005, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Well put! You going to San Diego?

Nah, going to Florida Internext for my next show. Have a great time in SD Jay.
WG

I play with Google.
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#81

05-30-2005, 01:00 AM

Originally posted by WiredGuy

But the way you worded your thread seems to me a scare tactic to get people to buy your SEO tutorials/consultation. The use of 2257 and SEO have very little to do with each other, it just so happens to be a hot topic of conversation with the upcoming law going into effect in a few weeks. If you want to peddle your SEO, try doing it without scaring people into it. It will work much better in the long run.

WG

lol I don't need scare people. They are already scared. I'm bringing up an obvious fact - that those with SE pages don't need to conform to tgp/mgp rules and therefore dont need to use content.

Some people didn't even realize that this was the case. Now they know and now they know there is a way to learn

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
WiredGuy

Pounding Googlebot

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 34516
Share

Post
#82

05-30-2005, 01:06 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

lol I don't need scare people. They are already scared. I'm bringing up an obvious fact - that those with SE pages don't need to conform to tgp/mgp rules and therefore dont need to use content.

Some people didn't even realize that this was the case. Now they know and now they know there is a way to learn

So why did you bring up 2257's then? You could have just said no content needed - SEO your site... etc. etc.

WG

I play with Google.
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#83

05-30-2005, 01:07 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

lol I don't need scare people. They are already scared. I'm bringing up an obvious fact - that those with SE pages don't need to conform to tgp/mgp rules and therefore dont need to use content.

Some people didn't even realize that this was the case. Now they know and now they know there is a way to learn

Your arguement is wrong on so many levels and you just had 2 of the best SE guys in the biz tell you that. If you want to continue with your profiteering...fine.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#84

05-30-2005, 01:09 AM

Originally posted by WiredGuy

So why did you bring up 2257's then? You could have just said no content needed - SEO your site... etc. etc.

WG

Because people are looking for other ways to make money from the internet now that 2257 is getting so sticky... and most people don't know that SE sites can easily become immune to 2257 laws by removing their content.

People are scared about 2257 --- this specific aspect of SE style sites applies to 2257.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#85

05-30-2005, 01:12 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Your arguement is wrong on so many levels and you just had 2 of the best SE guys in the biz tell you that. If you want to continue with your profiteering...fine.

I really don't give a shit what other SEO's think... I don't expect any support from my competition

I've never got any love from other SEO's on this board but I have got lots of new clients... I don't expect anything to change... you and the other haters reply while people who don't reply are the ones hiring me on icq

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#86

05-30-2005, 01:13 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

Because people are looking for other ways to make money from the internet now that 2257 is getting so sticky... and most people don't know that SE sites can easily become immune to 2257 laws by removing their content.

People are scared about 2257 --- this specific aspect of SE style sites applies to 2257.

Maybe if you repeat that enough times, even you'll start to believe it.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#87

05-30-2005, 01:21 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

I really don't give a shit what other SEO's think... I don't expect any support from my competition

I've never got any love from other SEO's on this board but I have got lots of new clients... I don't expect anything to change... you and the other haters reply while people who don't reply are the ones hiring me on icq

Yawn...I've been turning away SEO clients for months -- hell I'll send you the leads if you want them.

Me and WG are technicly competitors, but we still are friends (I like to think we are anyway - haha) so it ain't like that.

I just think what you are doing is wrong.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#88

05-30-2005, 01:26 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Yawn...I've been turning away SEO clients for months -- hell I'll send you the leads if you want them.

Me and WG are technicly competitors, but we still are friends (I like to think we are anyway - haha) so it ain't like that.

I just think what you are doing is wrong.

What is it that I'm doing? People are already worried about 2257.

I'm letting them know that you don't need content to make money from adult and that those worried about 2257 should get into SEO.

2257 is a big wake up call for a lot of people and they are looking for other ways to make money. I'm letting people know what the deal is with SEO and 2257 and how SE webmasters got it made in the shade as far as 2257 goes because we don't need content :D

You can forward those SEO leads to [email protected]

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#89

05-30-2005, 01:29 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

You can forward those SEO leads to [email protected]

Yep, just as I figured.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
WiredGuy

Pounding Googlebot

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 34516
Share

Post
#90

05-30-2005, 01:32 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Yawn...I've been turning away SEO clients for months -- hell I'll send you the leads if you want them.

Me and WG are technicly competitors, but we still are friends (I like to think we are anyway - haha) so it ain't like that.

I just think what you are doing is wrong.

I agree. Although people like Jay and Marc from Hoes are technically competitors, we bounce ideas off each other all the time to see what works and what doesn't. I don't see other SEO's as competition I'd like to get rid of but rather an ally to figuring out what the SE's have changed and whats working lately.

WG

I play with Google.
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#91

05-30-2005, 01:34 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

Yep, just as I figured.

lol I'm being sarcastic I don't expect you send me anything

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
guschi2k

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 489
Share

Post
#92

05-30-2005, 01:35 AM

...damn jojojo, that was one misleading mofu of a title. why don't you stop spamming your SEO stuff already ???

$$$ PimpRoll converts like a mofu, don't miss out on this shit $$$
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#93

05-30-2005, 01:37 AM

Originally posted by WiredGuy

I agree. Although people like Jay and Marc from Hoes are technically competitors, we bounce ideas off each other all the time to see what works and what doesn't. I don't see other SEO's as competition I'd like to get rid of but rather an ally to figuring out what the SE's have changed and whats working lately.

WG

well I've never got any kind of support from you in any of my threads over the years... or from any other seo guy for that matter. All I ever get is criticism... maybe its because I publically post my successful top ten rankings and that pisses of most other SEO guys...

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#94

05-30-2005, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

well I've never got any kind of support from you in any of my threads over the years... or from any other seo guy for that matter. All I ever get is criticism... maybe its because I publically post my successful top ten rankings and that pisses of most other SEO guys...

Sheesh.. this thread keeps hitting to the top and just read the header...

"SEO style sites are immune from 2257 laws..." DUH??

Cummon jojojo! :-) OK.. I know ya want to sell shit, but that claim is a bit bold!

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#95

05-30-2005, 01:44 AM

Originally posted by WiredGuy

I don't see other SEO's as competition I'd like to get rid of but rather an ally to figuring out what the SE's have changed and whats working lately.

WG

So it's OK for me to post your priority ID tag?

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#96

05-30-2005, 01:49 AM

Originally posted by Webby

Sheesh.. this thread keeps hitting to the top and just read the header...

"SEO style sites are immune from 2257 laws..." DUH??

Cummon jojojo! :-) OK.. I know ya want to sell shit, but that claim is a bit bold!

No its not bold... it true... SEO style sites don't need content and/or can remove all content and thus are immune...

Any site that doesnt use images is immune.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
xxxjay

Tube groupie.

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 13482
Share

Post
#97

05-30-2005, 01:52 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

well I've never got any kind of support from you in any of my threads over the years... or from any other seo guy for that matter. All I ever get is criticism... maybe its because I publically post my successful top ten rankings and that pisses of most other SEO guys...

When I had been "been doing SEO for last 2.5 years" (notice the .5 - haha) - I would have done some newbie shit like that. You have never even been on my radar until now and it isn't becasue of your SEO -- it's your shitty ethics that got you noticed.

Maybe you get so much "criticism" because you are easy not to like. You claim your are not profiteering off 2257, but look at the title of this thread.

I wonder how your "clients" must feel..that is...if you have any by the time this thread is over.

http://donttellmehowtoruinmylife.com/ - http://www.jmdigitalmarketing.com/my...s-and-reviews/ - http://www.wouldyouhitit.org - http://shinyobjectreviews.com/
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#98

05-30-2005, 01:52 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

So it's OK for me to post your priority ID tag?

You don't need a priority ID tag when you use this backdoor url to submit - just type in any 23 characters and it will work
http://www.google.com/priority_id_su...rs/submit.html

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
jojojo

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 2318
Share

Post
#99

05-30-2005, 01:56 AM

Originally posted by xxxjay

When I had been "been doing SEO for last 2.5 years" (notice the .5 - haha) - I would have done some newbie shit like that. You have never even been on my radar until now and it isn't becasue of your SEO -- it's your shitty ethics that got you noticed.

Maybe you get so much "criticism" because you are easy not to like. You claim your are not profiteering off 2257, but look at the title of this thread.

I wonder how your "clients" must feel..that is...if you have any by the time this thread is over.

lol how is posting examples of top ten rankings "newbie shit"??

It's because of those examples that I have got so many new clients.

I have never seen another self proclaimed seo guy post an example of a top ten result. Most seo guys are nothing but fancy lipservice.

I never said I wasn't profitting from 2257 laws

I said don't make it out like I am ripping people off or acting unethically by providing people with the truth about seo and how if you work the se's only you don't even have to worry about the 2257 laws.

Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
Comment
Webby

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14956
Share

Post
#100

05-30-2005, 02:01 AM

Originally posted by jojojo

No its not bold... it true... SEO style sites don't need content and/or can remove all content and thus are immune...

Any site that doesnt use images is immune.

Sure ain't what the header says!! :-)

It does say that SEO sites are immune from USC 2257 - not that they are immune as long as you remove all images/content.

There could be one hell of a lot of use of browser back keys if the imagery ain't there! BUT.. often words speak louder! :-) Like in this instance....

XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Comment

Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next

Working...