nats is not an asp, it is software that you purchase. If you bought microsoft word because it had features x, y, and z and Bill Gates decided one day that you didnt need a spell checker anymore and he just conveniently removed your ability to use that feature you'd be pretty fucking pissed I imagine.
I'm not questioning whether the content was good or not, i'm questioning nat's decision to retroactively remove a processor from a paysite.
How do you know which of your clients were using MVC? What about clients who own the software outright and lock you out?
I think when you start down the road of being the moral police for other people you're going to endanger your business.
The only person who "owns" software is the person who wrote it. Everyone else, whether they lease or purchase, is paying for a LICENSE to use it, nothing more.
As for Microsoft.... Bill Gates decides shit like this all the time.
-He had their Java virtual machine removed from IE installations.
-Added popup blockers and defaulted them to on.
-Is in the process of forcing SP2 downloads on everyone.
-Is removing DOS support from Longhorn
Bottom line.... the developers of NATS can do whatever they want, it's their code.
you know, i read somewhere that these "child modeling sites" basically legal child porn without the "porn" were actually put together by, or encouraged by the parents of these young girls.
Yes, it's all true, there's a big red switch in the office. If we flip it, everyone gets charged $99.95 and we jump in the escape capsule and we're whisked off to our private island in the Bahamas.
all of my sites are non nude and text. and all of the pictures are older (21-40) women or no women at all, just text. i actually have found that i make more money with this stuff than with the nudie penetration sex stuff. not like i'm a big playa or anything, but i don't have to work a day job anymore to make ends meet, that combined with my contracts with mainstream biz.
Comment