Nastychannels and 2257 Regulations

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NastyChannels
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2005
    • 561

    #1

    Nastychannels and 2257 Regulations

    Just to inform all our affiliates and webmasters on this board that we are AGAINST CHILD PORN and in compliance with 18 U.S.C. 2257.

    Please click on this link to know more about our promise...

    Nastychannels and 2257 Regulations



    [email protected]
    ICQ 310-218-683

    NASTYCHANNELS
    "Your Premier Adult Entertainment Network"
  • Doc911
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2004
    • 3695

    #2
    what about affiliates and downloadable content. will you be supplying webmasters with doc's so they can legally promote your material in their own galleries?


    For PHP/MySQL scripts ICQ 161480555 or email [email protected]

    Comment

    • FilthyRob
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2004
      • 6741

      #3
      I am so curious if linking to these record keepers addresses is enough. If an image or video is on my server, don't I have to keep actual hard copy records?
      AKA - Clubsexy

      Comment

      • Trixxxia
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2004
        • 5600

        #4
        Originally posted by FilthyRob
        I am so curious if linking to these record keepers addresses is enough. If an image or video is on my server, don't I have to keep actual hard copy records?
        That's been my understanding of what I've been reading - unless it's fully-clothed or non-hardcore content - I'm not a lawyer though.

        Comment

        • chadglni
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2002
          • 6924

          #5
          Oh dear.


          Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

          Comment

          • StuartD
            Sofa King Band
            • Jul 2002
            • 29903

            #6
            That makes you compliant to the old 2257 regs... congrats.

            Now what about the new regs?
            This is me on facebook
            This is me on twitter

            Comment

            • FilthyRob
              Confirmed User
              • Feb 2004
              • 6741

              #7
              Originally posted by TopBucksTrixxxia
              That's been my understanding of what I've been reading - unless it's fully-clothed or non-hardcore content - I'm not a lawyer though.
              Everything is open to interpretation for non-hardcore right? We are all gonna end up deleting 1000's of non-compliant galleries and sites, just because obtaining the actual model releases and id's and everything asked for will not be possible, that's a given I think.

              edit - I am referring to content from sponsors and content providers that won't provide them to you as an affiliate for whatever reason.
              Last edited by FilthyRob; 05-27-2005, 07:41 AM.
              AKA - Clubsexy

              Comment

              • NastyChannels
                Confirmed User
                • Mar 2005
                • 561

                #8
                According with the new 2257 regulations, each program will need to have all their models records and send them to webmasters who want to promote that content.

                We started adding that link on our bottom site to let you all know we are disagree with PORN CHILD. Right now NASTYCHANNELS is working hard on that to give our affiliates the best of us.


                If you want, you can hit me up..

                Cheers guys!!


                [email protected]
                ICQ 310-218-683

                NASTYCHANNELS
                "Your Premier Adult Entertainment Network"

                Comment

                • Doc911
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 3695

                  #9
                  can I get a yes or no to my question?


                  For PHP/MySQL scripts ICQ 161480555 or email [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • GigoloJustin
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 2244

                    #10
                    I noticed you listed adultlegal in your 2257 info.

                    Are you sure they are the holder of the records? I play it safe and list the producer.

                    Comment

                    • GigoloJustin
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 2244

                      #11
                      Originally posted by FilthyRob
                      I am so curious if linking to these record keepers addresses is enough. If an image or video is on my server, don't I have to keep actual hard copy records?

                      according to the new 2257, Yes.

                      Comment

                      • David - PG
                        Confirmed User
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 767

                        #12
                        Originally posted by NastyChannels
                        We started adding that link on our bottom site to let you all know we are disagree with PORN CHILD.
                        I don't think any program has to make a statement like that, it's pretty much implied. I couldn't think of a single person nor company that is pro child porn.
                        perfectgonzo.com

                        Comment

                        • directfiesta
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Oct 2002
                          • 30166

                          #13
                          Originally posted by David - PG
                          I don't think any program has to make a statement like that, it's pretty much implied. I couldn't think of a single person nor company that is pro child porn.


                          I tought it was sort of funny also ...
                          I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                          But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                          Comment

                          • NastyChannels
                            Confirmed User
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 561

                            #14
                            Originally posted by David - PG
                            I don't think any program has to make a statement like that, it's pretty much implied. I couldn't think of a single person nor company that is pro child porn.
                            You never knows David! There are a lot of people who likes that kind of porn


                            [email protected]
                            ICQ 310-218-683

                            NASTYCHANNELS
                            "Your Premier Adult Entertainment Network"

                            Comment

                            Working...