http://www.pimpcafe.com/article2/art...p?article=3436
"Indeed, the only purpose which such an interpretation of the law would serve would be to damage the local economy in favor of the economy in France or the Netherlands," said David Pannick while defending Interfact at the hearing while also adding that prohibiting mail order would breach Article 10 - the right to freedom of expression - of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Interfact was fined £3,000 for one offence of supplying and £2,000 for one offence of offering to supply. It was ordered to pay £25,617 prosecution costs.
Pabo Ltd was fined £2,500 in relation to one offence. It was ordered to pay £22,314 prosecution costs.
"Indeed, the only purpose which such an interpretation of the law would serve would be to damage the local economy in favor of the economy in France or the Netherlands," said David Pannick while defending Interfact at the hearing while also adding that prohibiting mail order would breach Article 10 - the right to freedom of expression - of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Interfact was fined £3,000 for one offence of supplying and £2,000 for one offence of offering to supply. It was ordered to pay £25,617 prosecution costs.
Pabo Ltd was fined £2,500 in relation to one offence. It was ordered to pay £22,314 prosecution costs.
Comment