USDOJ:"some sexually explicit materials are protected speech and not obscene"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lensman
    GFY Chaperone
    • Jan 2001
    • 9846

    #1

    USDOJ:"some sexually explicit materials are protected speech and not obscene"

    "some sexually explicit materials are protected speech and not obscene"

    Search for "not obscene": http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...5/05-10107.htm

    That's a big concession.
  • Spunky
    I need a beer
    • Jun 2002
    • 133978

    #2
    Very intresting read

    Comment

    • goBigtime
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2002
      • 7761

      #3
      There are plenty of known niches and "extreme" types of porn now.... I mean these niches are known inside the industry and outside by many consumers.

      They should be a little more clear of what they feel is obscene and prosecutable as such.


      Is A2M obscene? Is fisting? Is... the list goes on.

      Definitely addressable by them by each niche.
      Last edited by goBigtime; 05-24-2005, 04:50 PM.

      Comment

      • Damian_Maxcash
        So Fucking Banned
        • Oct 2002
        • 12745

        #4
        Anything that gets found on Bush's comp isnt obscene?

        Comment

        • goBigtime
          Confirmed User
          • Nov 2002
          • 7761

          #5
          I just think if 5/10 adult entertainment consumers can define what a niche type consists of, then the DOJ should be able to define if they feel that specific type of activity obscene.....

          Comment

          • DavieVegas
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2004
            • 6117

            #6
            all this shit is not clear..especially what affiliates need to continue promoting sponsors and what the sponsors will do about it
            SKYPE#: davievegas - email: ddmedia702[at]mail[.]com

            Comment

            • xclusive
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Apr 2004
              • 35218

              #7
              It's scary to be at the whim of these law makers who probably have much worse stuff in thier closets. It would be nice if they came out with more specific guide lines

              I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


              Comment

              • 2HousePlague
                CURATOR
                • Jul 2004
                • 14572

                #8
                Great. Mapplethorpe is vindicated. But what of us?


                j-
                tada!

                Comment

                • Damian_Maxcash
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 12745

                  #9
                  Originally posted by xclusive
                  It's scary to be at the whim of these law makers who probably have much worse stuff in thier closets. It would be nice if they came out with more specific guide lines
                  What I said in jest earlier is pretty close to the mark..... They want to come after us but they know that they need some protection from future polical scandels.

                  "Oh thats not obscene, at least not when its one of us looking at it - look, this paragraph says so"

                  Comment

                  • RawAlex
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Oct 2003
                    • 9465

                    #10
                    It's not obscene, but unless you have paperwork up the ying yang, you get to spend 5 years in a federal butt slamming prison.

                    Nice.

                    Alex

                    Comment

                    • pornstar2pac
                      Omaha Hi/Lo
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 17380

                      #11
                      hope this doesn't effect our golf game Lens
                      Trump haters gonna hate. that's all they can do

                      Comment

                      • reynold
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Oct 2002
                        • 51271

                        #12
                        USDOJ should be Al Qaeda's next target...

                        Comment

                        Working...