2257 and banners... question...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Adult Broker
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2004
    • 5265

    #1

    2257 and banners... question...

    it says

    "The revised regulations will take effect on June 23 and will place legal duties on nearly everyone involved in any way in the creation, production, publication and in some cases distribution, both physically and electronically, of material depicting "actual sexually explicit conduct."


    so my possibly dumb question is....how does this affect explicit banners on sites i.e. resource sites? banner trades, etc?

    would this be considered 'publication and distribution of materials' ?

    Gamma Entertainment | | Camz | Fleshbot| TheMobileBroker AdultShowsOnly
    Lori Z., The Adult Broker | theadultbroker.com | [email protected] |
    The Mobile Broker | themobilebroker.com | [email protected] |-Adult's ONE stop MOBILE shop
    ICQ: 289567792
  • chadglni
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2002
    • 6924

    #2
    yes 8char


    Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

    Comment

    • iBanker
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2004
      • 2758

      #3
      I would think so. Can you think of a reason it would not be considered one in the same?
      www.JasonandAlex.com
      Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

      Comment

      • wjxxx
        So Fucking Banned
        • Feb 2005
        • 4448

        #4
        They will require 2257 for banners

        Comment

        • Merrioc
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2003
          • 249

          #5
          Actually we?ve developed an online data application/database system with bonded disaster secure storage of original documents. It has the option of displaying ?sanitized? online versions, affiliate distribution and notification of addition, scanning service, PDF downloads, original producer verification and notification system for retrieval requests and a few other features. We?re just waiting to hear back from the lawyers that its matches the letter of the law and will protect webmasters. We?ll announce something in the coming week when we receive that verification.

          Comment

          • PhillipB
            Just a Simple Carpenter
            • May 2003
            • 1338

            #6
            Hey Lori,did my post about ICQ solve your problem?

            Comment

            • bopha
              Confirmed User
              • Sep 2002
              • 1882

              #7
              If it goes into effect June 23, is it retro active or is it on content produced after this date?

              Comment

              • thonglife
                So Fucking Banned
                • Oct 2004
                • 1566

                #8
                Originally posted by wjxxx
                They will require 2257 for banners
                Goodbye U.S. host. Hello Hong Kong!

                Comment

                • The Adult Broker
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 5265

                  #9
                  Originally posted by APN Philip
                  Hey Lori,did my post about ICQ solve your problem?
                  Hi hon, well I figured out how to do the manual alphabetizing but the increase for names, still working on.


                  re: 2257 and banners - I figured banners would be considered 'content' and banners are on all kinds of sites including Resource sites, like mine...

                  and resource sites have been fairly immune to 2257 thus far, so this is an interesting twist.

                  Gamma Entertainment | | Camz | Fleshbot| TheMobileBroker AdultShowsOnly
                  Lori Z., The Adult Broker | theadultbroker.com | [email protected] |
                  The Mobile Broker | themobilebroker.com | [email protected] |-Adult's ONE stop MOBILE shop
                  ICQ: 289567792

                  Comment

                  • Donny
                    As you wish...
                    • May 2002
                    • 13754

                    #10

                    Comment

                    • Dirty F
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jul 2001
                      • 59204

                      #11

                      Comment

                      Working...