Fletch is talking about "fantacy" sites.... at least I hope that shit isnt real
These are real 5, 6, 7 year olds in underwear - I just cant see how you can sugar coat that and say it is ok
5, 6, 7 year olds? Where was that age mentioned? They are pre-pubescent, that is near pedophilish, and much worse than 15, 16, 17 year olds wearing clothes; not saying either is good or right or moral and whatnot, but 15, 16, 17 year olds wearing clothes could definitely be in the same category of 'wrong' as forced gagging, puking/vomitting .. of course the argument there is the models / girls want to do it, but I'm sure, with at least the 15, 16, 17 year olds I'm sure they're smart enough; though the last part of your brain to develop is decision making, which is once you're 25 years old, so should 25 be when you're considered an adult? Most people on this board are over 25, and extremely immature and can be nasty people. So since some of the girls doing forced gagging and vomitting because they want to, some of the 15, 16, 17 year olds could be doing it because they want to, and if they're making money at it.. then that's what they're doing. I'm just arguing here.. 5, 6, 7 year olds in underwear is what a pedophile would look at, teenagers can't fit under the definition of what a pedophile likes... but yeah, both forced gagging and teenagers posing nude could be, and likely are frowned upon both quite a bit.. teenagers posing nude is less violent and destructive and degrading though.
5, 6, 7 year olds? Where was that age mentioned? They are pre-pubescent, that is near pedophilish, and much worse than 15, 16, 17 year olds wearing clothes; not saying either is good or right or moral and whatnot, but 15, 16, 17 year olds wearing clothes could definitely be in the same category of 'wrong' as forced gagging, puking/vomitting .. of course the argument there is the models / girls want to do it, but I'm sure, with at least the 15, 16, 17 year olds I'm sure they're smart enough; though the last part of your brain to develop is decision making, which is once you're 25 years old, so should 25 be when you're considered an adult? Most people on this board are over 25, and extremely immature and can be nasty people. So since some of the girls doing forced gagging and vomitting because they want to, some of the 15, 16, 17 year olds could be doing it because they want to, and if they're making money at it.. then that's what they're doing. I'm just arguing here.. 5, 6, 7 year olds in underwear is what a pedophile would look at, teenagers can't fit under the definition of what a pedophile likes... but yeah, both forced gagging and teenagers posing nude could be, and likely are frowned upon both quite a bit.. teenagers posing nude is less violent and destructive and degrading though.
Matt
Its been mentioned a few times in the thread that the site links to very young girl sites (pre-teen) made by the same person and billed by MVC.
Its sickening that this type of shit manages to skirt around the CP laws.
Hopefully, this is the type of site that the government will make a priority going after when these new 2257 regs get posted
Regards,
Lee
okay heres the deal guys, i want this crap removed from GFY right away. or im calling the F.B.I. within an hour. i swear i have each and every ones ip no# if for any reason you ass hats thank im jokeing. trust me whom ever clicked on that link will have to answer to the LAW. you got ONE hour to remove this whole entire thread. and if you know trashman like i know myself. im ooh so serious. today it's going down. the site and every body who clicked on that link.
And I also forgot to mention that you're an idiot, BlackGarbageMan. The adult business desperately needs more attention from the authorities in spite of 2257. Sending them links to GFY is a wise move on your part.
okay heres the deal guys, i want this crap removed from GFY right away. or im calling the F.B.I. within an hour. i swear i have each and every ones ip no# if for any reason you ass hats thank im jokeing. trust me whom ever clicked on that link will have to answer to the LAW. you got ONE hour to remove this whole entire thread. and if you know trashman like i know myself. im ooh so serious. today it's going down. the site and every body who clicked on that link.
okay heres the deal guys, i want this crap removed from GFY right away. or im calling the F.B.I. within an hour. i swear i have each and every ones ip no# if for any reason you ass hats thank im jokeing. trust me whom ever clicked on that link will have to answer to the LAW. you got ONE hour to remove this whole entire thread. and if you know trashman like i know myself. im ooh so serious. today it's going down. the site and every body who clicked on that link.
and I assume that you have clicked on the link to determine whether it was cp or not? you really need to know your legal system first before making threats
some of those non nude model sites act as a portfolio for aspiring models... why not get paid for it... but i do believe the anything under 14 is 'morally' wrong since the child really isn't getting the whole perspective on things...
Actually, I don't think any female under 28 really has a solid perspective on things!
Do they sell it as porn sites ? cauz I don't see it marketed ast porn sites on there ... couple years ago that kind of stuff was ALL OVER ... I hate that shit thought ... really sick . I bet the guy makes some nice bling with his little network
Originally posted by rayadp05
I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Yes... It is sick shit and abusive shit, and really disturbing. But, if they're clothed, it's protected under the first amendment and is not considered pornography. So, it's not going away through prosecution.
However, it wouldn't hurt to go after the hosting/ processing companies if you're motivated to do so. ;)
Yes... It is sick shit and abusive shit, and really disturbing. But, if they're clothed, it's protected under the first amendment and is not considered pornography. So, it's not going away through prosecution.
However, it wouldn't hurt to go after the hosting/ processing companies if you're motivated to do so.
And I also forgot to mention that you're an idiot, BlackGarbageMan. The adult business desperately needs more attention from the authorities in spite of 2257. Sending them links to GFY is a wise move on your part.
fuck you ass face, this site was not made in germany or over sea's it was made right here in the U.S.A. heres there address dip shit:
Lovely Alazai
c/o Webmaster
#121
1270 N. Wickham Rd. Suite 16
Melbourne, FL 32935
fuck you ass face, this site was not made in germany or over sea's it was made right here in the U.S.A. heres there address dip shit:
Lovely Alazai
c/o Webmaster
#121
1270 N. Wickham Rd. Suite 16
Melbourne, FL 32935
oh yeah and heres mr.lee's i.p. no# 77.166.43.39
he's gonna be in a shock of his life real soon, im so glad you ass holes thank this is funny. boy have i got a suprise for you perverts. sit back and watch.
oh yeah and heres mr.lee's i.p. no# 77.166.43.39
he's gonna be in a shock of his life real soon, im so glad you ass holes thank this is funny. boy have i got a suprise for you perverts. sit back and watch.
LOL... There is an FBI agent somewhere laughing almost as hard as everyone here.
Bottom line is it is not CP unless the suggestive poses allow you to view their private parts through the clothing (even if the clothing is opaque). In other words she is arching her back so far you can basically make the private parts out...
Find that in the members area and then go to the FBI.
Comment