Sponsor closes their sites because of new 2257 (BadGirlBucks)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fireorange
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2005
    • 1648

    #1

    Sponsor closes their sites because of new 2257 (BadGirlBucks)

    Just got this e-mail from a sponsor:


    After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote.

    There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send.

    We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic.

    All of our other sites will continue to operate as is.
    Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks!
    http://www.BadGirlBucks.com
  • Basic_man
    Programming King Pin
    • Oct 2003
    • 27360

    #2
    Damn, that sucks big time. I'm wondering why they are closing their doors..
    UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
    Stop looking! Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 !

    Comment

    • Phoenix
      BACON BACON BACON
      • Nov 2002
      • 35475

      #3
      they closed just two sites..and wisely

      looks like they will continue to operate their other sites?

      a proper title would have been.."some" of their sites

      ;)
      Telegram PhoenixBrad
      https://quantads.io

      Comment

      • FunForOne
        Confirmed User
        • Nov 2003
        • 8704

        #4
        I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.

        Comment

        • who
          So Fucking Banned
          • Aug 2003
          • 19593

          #5
          Originally posted by FunForOne
          I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.
          Spot on.

          Comment

          • xNetworx
            So Fucking What
            • Jan 2004
            • 14445

            #6
            They are only closing 2 sites fucktard

            Comment

            • StuartD
              Sofa King Band
              • Jul 2002
              • 29903

              #7
              got that email as well...
              yeah, they definitely have more than 2 sites... so they're not closed by any means. Just shutting down 2 of their sites.
              This is me on facebook
              This is me on twitter

              Comment

              • thonglife
                So Fucking Banned
                • Oct 2004
                • 1566

                #8
                Originally posted by fireorange
                Just got this e-mail from a sponsor:


                After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote.

                There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send.

                We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic.

                All of our other sites will continue to operate as is.
                Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks!
                http://www.BadGirlBucks.com
                I once had to "remind" them to put a 2257 statement on an already published site. Makes me really wonder about them.

                Comment

                • thonglife
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Oct 2004
                  • 1566

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FunForOne
                  I wonder if the 2257 regulation might end up being a scape goat for under-performing sites as well.
                  Yup yup..

                  Comment

                  • fireorange
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 1648

                    #10
                    Originally posted by pimpporn
                    They are only closing 2 sites fucktard


                    I'm so offended, not.

                    Bump.

                    Comment

                    • cherrylula
                      lol
                      • Jan 2002
                      • 15969

                      #11
                      geez, well bye bye links to all their sites then. And I just started getting SE traffic too, awww shucks.

                      what's with all these reckless solo girl sites? More people who don't want to pay the girl to keep up the site I suppose. Gee, go figure they have to take them down.

                      Comment

                      • AaronM
                        GFY Royality ;)
                        • Oct 2001
                        • 46917

                        #12
                        Originally posted by cherrylula
                        what's with all these reckless solo girl sites? More people who don't want to pay the girl to keep up the site I suppose. Gee, go figure they have to take them down.

                        The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

                        Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

                        Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

                        This is a common newbie mistake.

                        Comment

                        • who
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Aug 2003
                          • 19593

                          #13
                          Originally posted by thonglife
                          I once had to "remind" them to put a 2257 statement on an already published site. Makes me really wonder about them.
                          Oh no... more dramatic implications. Let me guess, underage performers?

                          No, no no no no no no

                          Just.. no.

                          Comment

                          • thonglife
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Oct 2004
                            • 1566

                            #14
                            Originally posted by .?.
                            Oh no... more dramatic implications. Let me guess, underage performers?

                            No, no no no no no no

                            Just.. no.
                            Nah... I know that's what you were getting a hard-on for though. It makes me wonder if anyone is paying attention.. to things such as coding.
                            Last edited by thonglife; 05-24-2005, 10:51 AM.

                            Comment

                            • FunForOne
                              Confirmed User
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 8704

                              #15
                              Originally posted by AaronM
                              The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

                              Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

                              Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

                              This is a common newbie mistake.

                              In my opinion, very few girls are qualified to run a solo site. They have to have that "I"ve got to see more of her" appeal. It takes more than beauty to pull that off. Part of that is in the implied personallity of the girl.

                              Also, I imagine to stay profitable, they have to go out of their way to make the site interactive and keep members. Generally, in business, is cheaper to keep the customers you have than to get new ones.

                              There is a solo gal on gfy with big boobs and blonde hair that does it correctly.

                              Comment

                              • rockbear
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 806

                                #16
                                Originally posted by .?.
                                Oh no... more dramatic implications. Let me guess, underage performers?

                                No, no no no no no no

                                Just.. no.

                                I'm thinking the same thing. Why that sponsor close only 2 sites? That smell not good at all.

                                Comment

                                • detoxed
                                  vip member
                                  • Jan 2003
                                  • 17798

                                  #17
                                  I love solo girls

                                  Comment

                                  • fris
                                    I have to go potty
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 55818

                                    #18
                                    they bought their content off simon synester. why do you think?
                                    Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.


                                    My Newest Theme

                                    Comment

                                    • Turf
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Jul 2001
                                      • 1865

                                      #19
                                      without having seen the members area i would say that they must have another reason for closing down those 2 sites.. they are pretty non risque if you ask me..
                                      Daddy Strokes - mature men stroking their meat
                                      Mature Gay Movies - mature men fucking everyone!
                                      Pleasing Daddy - young girls fucking mature men

                                      Looking for submitter accounts for older men niche content (both gay and straight) so hit me up if you run a tube and offer submitter accounts for paysites.

                                      Comment

                                      • eroswebmaster
                                        March 1st, 2003
                                        • Jul 2001
                                        • 20295

                                        #20
                                        LOL why shut down missymonroe.com it's not like you couldn't get the 2557 info...she's here in Vegas.
                                        For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
                                        Click here for more details

                                        Comment

                                        • bigdog
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jul 2001
                                          • 6964

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by AaronM
                                          The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

                                          Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

                                          Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

                                          This is a common newbie mistake.
                                          good post

                                          solo girl sites with revshare programs are a dime a dozen these days, unless you got a lot of your own traffic i think you will be in deep shit trying to get affilates.

                                          Comment

                                          • James White
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Apr 2004
                                            • 1405

                                            #22
                                            BadGirlBucks is a really good program, ive talked to the owners for a long time now, they have a VERY tight program as far as i have seen. They have told me they do everything inhouse, is this not true?
                                            SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60. Let me repeat... A 120 x 60 button and no more that 3 lines of DEFAULT SIZE AND COLOR text.

                                            Comment

                                            • AaronM
                                              GFY Royality ;)
                                              • Oct 2001
                                              • 46917

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by James White
                                              BadGirlBucks is a really good program, ive talked to the owners for a long time now, they have a VERY tight program as far as i have seen. They have told me they do everything inhouse, is this not true?

                                              I checked out the 2 sites that they are closing down. Neither girl was worth a solo site in the first place.

                                              Although NONE of the sites of theirs that I looked at contain a legal 2257 declaration, the Missy Monroe site specifically mentions "SYNISTER FILMS" which tells me that they are not producing this stuff in house.

                                              Comment

                                              • Nickatilynx
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Feb 2002
                                                • 819

                                                #24
                                                I gotta agree with Aaron on this.

                                                But if anyone wants to sell me sites , I may be buying , so nice being in Canada ,eh

                                                icq 8042030
                                                Skype - Nickatilynx

                                                Comment

                                                • Shooting_Manic
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Jan 2005
                                                  • 1740

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by AaronM
                                                  The problem, as I see it, is that many of the people who are launching these solo girl sites are doing so because they have seen programs such as Lightspeed who are successful with solo sites.

                                                  Many of these new sites are run by people who have no traffic, no money to buy traffic, and do not have an established affiliate base.

                                                  Because of this, the sites under perform. The site owners do not make much money with them and it's difficult to justify the continued expense of producing updates when the dollars are not coming in as they expected.

                                                  This is a common newbie mistake.

                                                  So very correct. You can make any site convert, ugly, fat, whatever if you have traffic and a budget to make it happen. Starting a new program, with no traffic and no money behind it is bound to fail. Theres way to many established site options out there for the little guy to just throw up a site and expect traffic and sales to be there. Some serious players are getting into this market, programs with the resources it takes to really make it happen. They have the traffic, backend and budget. This market is going to get very interesting over the next 6 months.

                                                  Point being, if you cant send at least 10k a day of traffic to the site, day one on your own, then you should rethink this market or any market for that matter.
                                                  Last edited by Shooting_Manic; 05-24-2005, 12:07 PM.
                                                  SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • crockett
                                                    in a van by the river
                                                    • May 2003
                                                    • 76818

                                                    #26
                                                    The reason it was only those two sites from the looks of it, is because those two were their only "nude" sites. The rest are all non-nude tease sites.. They also probably don't preform as well being most of their affiliates are probably NN webmasters as they are their own little niche..
                                                    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • thonglife
                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                      • Oct 2004
                                                      • 1566

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by fireorange
                                                      Just got this e-mail from a sponsor:


                                                      After careful consideration, MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com will no longer be accepting new sales as of June 1st, 2005. We have decided to remove these 2 sites from our program due to the recent signing of the new 2257 regulations. We will continue to produce "non-explicit" tease sites for you to promote.

                                                      There is "no need" to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st. The members area of each site will continue to be accessible until all members have cancelled. You will continue to receive credit for any and all rebills. You will continue to receive credit for every person you send.

                                                      We value you as an affiliate and will continue to help make you the most money on your traffic.

                                                      All of our other sites will continue to operate as is.
                                                      Thank you for promoting BadGirlBucks!
                                                      http://www.BadGirlBucks.com
                                                      I laughed at this part too. "There is 'no need' to remove your links to MissyMonroe18.com & SusieTease.com, as we will be redirecting all traffic from these sites to other sites in our network as of June 1st."

                                                      Yes.. surfers like misleading and dead links.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • psyko514
                                                        See sig. Join Epic Cash.
                                                        • Oct 2002
                                                        • 22366

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by AaronM
                                                        I checked out the 2 sites that they are closing down. Neither girl was worth a solo site in the first place.

                                                        Although NONE of the sites of theirs that I looked at contain a legal 2257 declaration, the Missy Monroe site specifically mentions "SYNISTER FILMS" which tells me that they are not producing this stuff in house.
                                                        Very few of their sites require a legal 2257 declaration in the first place

                                                        Bad Girl Bucks
                                                        - 50% Revshare through CCBill.
                                                        Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!

                                                        Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
                                                        email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014

                                                        Comment

                                                        Working...