New 2257 regs published (link here)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chadglni
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2002
    • 6924

    #51
    What's worse than the gov imposing these regulations is the leech ass webmasters trying to get rich off of them. That guy supported the new regs. just so he could pander his program.

    50 comments.

    ~~~Posted by wojbotv2.1


    Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

    Comment

    • GatorB
      The Demon & 12clicks
      • Oct 2001
      • 18208

      #52
      Two commenters commented that the definition of producer in the
      proposed rule was too broad and would encompass a convenience store
      that sold sexually explicit magazines or a movie theater that screened
      R-rated movies. The Department declines to adopt this comment. As the
      rule makes clear, mere distributors of sexually explicit material are
      excluded from the definition of producers
      and under no plausible
      construction of the definition would a movie theater be covered merely
      by screening films produced by others.


      Ok so how is me making a TGP gallery different than a store selling a copy of Hustler? Logic would say I am only distributing the content. Hell I didn't shoot those fucking pics or movies. This law contridicts itself.

      Comment

      • GatorB
        The Demon & 12clicks
        • Oct 2001
        • 18208

        #53
        Originally posted by Almighty Colin
        Every industry is regulated. Take a look at the massive regulations which govern the securities markets with jail time and large fines for those that do not comply.

        Roll up your sleeves and get to work.
        I thought republicans were against government regualtion of businesses? They seem to want to delregulate every other business.

        Comment

        • Tempest
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • May 2004
          • 10217

          #54
          Originally posted by faxxaff
          Why should a foreign webmaster comply with US rules? The US has no jurisdiction over him and the sponsor can not be made liable for the acting of another person.
          It will be a lot less work and hassle for a sponsor to provide FHGs as opposed to content sets with all the docs.. So if you count on content from your sponsor, you'll be affected...

          I won't even touch on the word "conspiracy" in section 75.1(2). I'm not a lawyer so don't know how to take that.

          Comment

          • Nate-MM2
            So Fucking Banned
            • Sep 2002
            • 263

            #55
            Originally posted by chadglni
            What's worse than the gov imposing these regulations is the leech ass webmasters trying to get rich off of them. That guy supported the new regs. just so he could pander his program.
            Assuming you were referring to me, that's ridiculous.

            I never supported the new regulations either publicly or privately. I'm not sure where you get your information.

            My apologies in advance if you were referring to the content management & record keeping programs being talked about on the boards.

            Comment

            • Nate-MM2
              So Fucking Banned
              • Sep 2002
              • 263

              #56
              Originally posted by GatorB
              I thought republicans were against government regualtion of businesses? They seem to want to delregulate every other business.
              They have to actually be in power to de-regulate other businesses. Clamping down on us keeps a large portion of their civilian supporters in good favour.

              Comment

              • Snake Doctor
                I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                • Mar 2001
                • 13449

                #57
                Originally posted by GatorB

                Ok so how is me making a TGP gallery different than a store selling a copy of Hustler? Logic would say I am only distributing the content. Hell I didn't shoot those fucking pics or movies. This law contridicts itself.
                Because you have editorial control over what pictures go on your webpage, the convenience store clerk has no control over what is in the magazine.
                sig too big

                Comment

                • Tempest
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • May 2004
                  • 10217

                  #58
                  Originally posted by GatorB
                  Ok so how is me making a TGP gallery different than a store selling a copy of Hustler?
                  You sort of answered it yourself.. you "make" the page that's getting published where's the store is distributing a magazine that hustler published. In a way, your host and the internet are distributing what you produced.

                  Comment

                  • chadglni
                    Confirmed User
                    • Dec 2002
                    • 6924

                    #59
                    Originally posted by GatorB

                    Ok so how is me making a TGP gallery different than a store selling a copy of Hustler? Logic would say I am only distributing the content. Hell I didn't shoot those fucking pics or movies. This law contridicts itself.
                    (c) Producer means any person, including any individual,
                    corporation, or other organization, who is a primary producer or a
                    secondary producer.
                    (1) A primary producer is any person who actually films,
                    videotapes, photographs, or creates a digitally- or computer-
                    manipulated image, a digital image, or picture of, or digitizes an
                    image of, a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual
                    sexually explicit conduct.
                    (2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles,
                    manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book,
                    magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer-
                    manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial
                    distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being
                    engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a
                    computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the
                    sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a
                    visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually
                    explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract,
                    agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.
                    (3) The same person may be both a primary and a secondary producer.
                    (4) Producer does not include persons whose activities relating to
                    the visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct are limited to
                    the following:
                    (i) Photo or film processing, including digitization of previously
                    existing visual depictions, as part of a commercial enterprise, with no
                    other commercial interest in the sexually explicit material, printing,
                    and video duplicators;
                    (ii) Mere distribution;
                    (iii) Any activity, other than those activities identified in
                    paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section, that does not involve the
                    hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the
                    participation of the depicted performers;
                    (iv) A provider of web-hosting services who does not, and
                    reasonably cannot, manage the sexually explicit content of the computer
                    site or service; or
                    (v) A provider of an electronic communication service or remote
                    computing service who does not, and reasonably cannot, manage the
                    sexually explicit content of the computer site or service.


                    Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                    Comment

                    • chadglni
                      Confirmed User
                      • Dec 2002
                      • 6924

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Nate-MM2
                      Assuming you were referring to me, that's ridiculous.

                      I never supported the new regulations either publicly or privately. I'm not sure where you get your information.

                      My apologies in advance if you were referring to the content management & record keeping programs being talked about on the boards.
                      No, the comment quoted earlier that was sent in by a webmaster who agreed with the regulations.


                      Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                      Comment

                      • GatorB
                        The Demon & 12clicks
                        • Oct 2001
                        • 18208

                        #61
                        The Department declines to adopt this comment. The requirement that
                        records maintained pursuant to section 2257 be segregated not only
                        streamlines the inspection process but protects producers from
                        unbridled fishing expeditions. Inspectors should not be faced with
                        situations in which they have to sift through myriad filing cabinets to
                        find the records they are seeking,


                        Well too fucking bad. YOUR rule YOU should have deal with the messes you fucking BIATCHES!

                        Comment

                        • GatorB
                          The Demon & 12clicks
                          • Oct 2001
                          • 18208

                          #62
                          Originally posted by chadglni
                          (c) Producer means any person, including any individual,
                          corporation, or other organization, who is a primary producer or a
                          secondary producer.
                          (1) A primary producer is any person who actually films,
                          videotapes, photographs, or creates a digitally- or computer-
                          manipulated image, a digital image, or picture of, or digitizes an
                          image of, a visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual
                          sexually explicit conduct.
                          (2) A secondary producer is any person who produces, assembles,
                          manufactures, publishes, duplicates, reproduces, or reissues a book,
                          magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer-
                          manipulated image, picture, or other matter intended for commercial
                          distribution that contains a visual depiction of an actual human being
                          engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct, or who inserts on a
                          computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the
                          sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a
                          visual depiction of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually
                          explicit conduct, including any person who enters into a contract,
                          agreement, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing.
                          (3) The same person may be both a primary and a secondary producer.
                          (4) Producer does not include persons whose activities relating to
                          the visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct are limited to
                          the following:
                          (i) Photo or film processing, including digitization of previously
                          existing visual depictions, as part of a commercial enterprise, with no
                          other commercial interest in the sexually explicit material, printing,
                          and video duplicators;
                          (ii) Mere distribution;
                          (iii) Any activity, other than those activities identified in
                          paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section, that does not involve the
                          hiring, contracting for, managing, or otherwise arranging for the
                          participation of the depicted performers;
                          (iv) A provider of web-hosting services who does not, and
                          reasonably cannot, manage the sexually explicit content of the computer
                          site or service; or
                          (v) A provider of an electronic communication service or remote
                          computing service who does not, and reasonably cannot, manage the
                          sexually explicit content of the computer site or service.
                          Blah blah. Don't quote crap. I'm asking LOGICALLY. Not according to stupid rules. LOGICALLY how would a person with at least average intelligence explain the difference there is NONE.

                          Comment

                          • Nate-MM2
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 263

                            #63
                            Originally posted by chadglni
                            No, the comment quoted earlier that was sent in by a webmaster who agreed with the regulations.
                            My apologies then, sorry.

                            Comment

                            • chadglni
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2002
                              • 6924

                              #64
                              Originally posted by GatorB
                              Blah blah. Don't quote crap. I'm asking LOGICALLY. Not according to stupid rules. LOGICALLY how would a person with at least average intelligence explain the difference there is NONE.
                              I wasn't arguing with you, you defensive jackass. I was quoting the part in question so anyone that wanted to answer your question would have it in front of their face.


                              Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                              Comment

                              • MickeyG
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2004
                                • 4134

                                #65
                                Originally posted by chadglni
                                No, the comment quoted earlier that was sent in by a webmaster who agreed with the regulations.

                                do you think it was it that Brandon guy? He made one of those systems, didn't he?

                                Comment

                                • GatorB
                                  The Demon & 12clicks
                                  • Oct 2001
                                  • 18208

                                  #66
                                  Originally posted by Tempest
                                  You sort of answered it yourself.. you "make" the page that's getting published where's the store is distributing a magazine that hustler published. In a way, your host and the internet are distributing what you produced.
                                  OH bullshit. How else do you get pics to show up on the internet? That's like saying if a store makes a display for it's porno mags then they are required to comply with 2257 and they are not. Once again NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE.

                                  Comment

                                  • chadglni
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Dec 2002
                                    • 6924

                                    #67
                                    Originally posted by chadglni
                                    I wasn't arguing with you, you defensive jackass. I was quoting the part in question so anyone that wanted to answer your question would have it in front of their face.
                                    And to answer your question, a convenient store doesn't publish any thing. They don't copy any explicit pictures and "publish" them in their store. You on the other hand publish them when you put it on a domain. You can sell a website all day long you just can't publish an explicit picture to do it.


                                    Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                                    Comment

                                    • Nate-MM2
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Sep 2002
                                      • 263

                                      #68
                                      Originally posted by GatorB
                                      OH bullshit. How else do you get pics to show up on the internet? That's like saying if a store makes a display for it's porno mags then they are required to comply with 2257 and they are not. Once again NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE.
                                      But why are you arguing about it here?

                                      We didn't make the rules...

                                      Comment

                                      • GatorB
                                        The Demon & 12clicks
                                        • Oct 2001
                                        • 18208

                                        #69
                                        Originally posted by chadglni
                                        I wasn't arguing with you, you defensive jackass. I was quoting the part in question so anyone that wanted to answer your question would have it in front of their face.
                                        Point is a wanted logical responses from PEOPLE. Not quotes from the new rules. Kind of if I asked you what love was. Don't go get a fucking book tell me what YOUR logical reason opinion is.

                                        Comment

                                        • chadglni
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Dec 2002
                                          • 6924

                                          #70
                                          Originally posted by GatorB
                                          OH bullshit. How else do you get pics to show up on the internet? That's like saying if a store makes a display for it's porno mags then they are required to comply with 2257 and they are not. Once again NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE.
                                          I've never seen an explicit image in a video store. I don't know of any magazines that have explicit pictures on the cover. You could write HI in big ass letters with porno mags across your store and you still aren't displaying explicit images. You are so pissed about these regulations you are talking shit that makes no sense.


                                          Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                                          Comment

                                          • GatorB
                                            The Demon & 12clicks
                                            • Oct 2001
                                            • 18208

                                            #71
                                            Originally posted by Nate-MM2
                                            But why are you arguing about it here?

                                            We didn't make the rules...

                                            I'm not argiung I'm pointing out contidiction and hypocrisy in the rules. I'm looking for consensus. Either you A) agree with me or B) you agree with the rules. I don't care which but if you don't agree with me at least come up with your own reasons.

                                            Comment

                                            • Snake Doctor
                                              I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                              • Mar 2001
                                              • 13449

                                              #72
                                              GatorB I already answered your question.

                                              The difference is you have editorial control over what goes on your web page.
                                              sig too big

                                              Comment

                                              • GatorB
                                                The Demon & 12clicks
                                                • Oct 2001
                                                • 18208

                                                #73
                                                Originally posted by chadglni
                                                I've never seen an explicit image in a video store. I don't know of any magazines that have explicit pictures on the cover. You could write HI in big ass letters with porno mags across your store and you still aren't displaying explicit images.
                                                You go to the wrong stores. I've seen PLENTY of explicit images in ponro shops and plenty of mags with hardcore sex on the covers.

                                                You are so pissed about these regulations you are talking shit that makes no sense.
                                                I'm making perfect sense and 99.99% of what do involves ZERO content. So am I effected? What little content I do have out there will be gone before June 23rd.

                                                Comment

                                                • chadglni
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Dec 2002
                                                  • 6924

                                                  #74
                                                  I didn't mean to type video store. However they still aren't publishing anything.


                                                  Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                                                  Comment

                                                  • swedguy
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Jan 2002
                                                    • 7981

                                                    #75
                                                    One commenter also commented that
                                                    the proposed rule may force foreign
                                                    primary producers to violate foreign
                                                    laws regarding protection of
                                                    information.
                                                    If primary producers in
                                                    foreign countries decide to comply with
                                                    their home privacy laws and not
                                                    provide materials to U.S. entities, the
                                                    regulation will chill the availability of
                                                    materials and speech to U.S. citizens.
                                                    The Department declines to adopt this
                                                    comment. The rule is no different from
                                                    other forms of labeling requirements
                                                    imposed on foreign producers of, e.g.,
                                                    alcohol, tobacco, or food items that are
                                                    imported into the United States. In
                                                    order to sell in the U.S. market, foreign
                                                    producers must comply with U.S. laws.
                                                    This rule applies equally to any sexually
                                                    explicit material introduced into the
                                                    stream of commerce in the United States
                                                    no matter where it was produced.

                                                    Foreign producers have the option of
                                                    not complying with the rule, but then
                                                    their access to the U.S. market is justly
                                                    and lawfully prohibited.



                                                    Internet 101.
                                                    If I have material on an European server, I'm in Europe. People from the US can access my material, am I then selling to the US market?
                                                    If yes, then I have to comply with laws in every single country in the world.
                                                    If no, good for me.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • GatorB
                                                      The Demon & 12clicks
                                                      • Oct 2001
                                                      • 18208

                                                      #76
                                                      Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                      GatorB I already answered your question.

                                                      The difference is you have editorial control over what goes on your web page.
                                                      Once again so? That's just BS talk for these rules. I'm talking YOUR personal LOGICAL opinion. Should a regular Joe be under MORE regualtions than someone who owns say 20 porno shops each with 10's of 1000's of movies, mags etc? I might as well just go own a porno shop because acccording to these rules I'm not required to have records to make sure that the movies I'm selling don't have underage girls in them. Hmmmmmmmm.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • chadglni
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Dec 2002
                                                        • 6924

                                                        #77
                                                        Originally posted by swedguy
                                                        One commenter also commented that
                                                        the proposed rule may force foreign
                                                        primary producers to violate foreign
                                                        laws regarding protection of
                                                        information.
                                                        If primary producers in
                                                        foreign countries decide to comply with
                                                        their home privacy laws and not
                                                        provide materials to U.S. entities, the
                                                        regulation will chill the availability of
                                                        materials and speech to U.S. citizens.
                                                        The Department declines to adopt this
                                                        comment. The rule is no different from
                                                        other forms of labeling requirements
                                                        imposed on foreign producers of, e.g.,
                                                        alcohol, tobacco, or food items that are
                                                        imported into the United States. In
                                                        order to sell in the U.S. market, foreign
                                                        producers must comply with U.S. laws.
                                                        This rule applies equally to any sexually
                                                        explicit material introduced into the
                                                        stream of commerce in the United States
                                                        no matter where it was produced.

                                                        Foreign producers have the option of
                                                        not complying with the rule, but then
                                                        their access to the U.S. market is justly
                                                        and lawfully prohibited.



                                                        Internet 101.
                                                        If I have material on an European server, I'm in Europe. People from the US can access my material, am I then selling to the US market?
                                                        If yes, then I have to comply with laws in every single country in the world.
                                                        If no, good for me.
                                                        Wow, that's fucked up.


                                                        Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                                                        Comment

                                                        • GatorB
                                                          The Demon & 12clicks
                                                          • Oct 2001
                                                          • 18208

                                                          #78
                                                          For those NOT from the US that think this doesn't effect them.


                                                          In order to sell in the U.S. market, foreign
                                                          producers must comply with U.S. laws.
                                                          This rule applies equally to any sexually
                                                          explicit material introduced into the
                                                          stream of commerce in the United States
                                                          no matter where it was produced.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Snake Doctor
                                                            I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                            • Mar 2001
                                                            • 13449

                                                            #79
                                                            Originally posted by GatorB
                                                            Once again so? That's just BS talk for these rules. I'm talking YOUR personal LOGICAL opinion. Should a regular Joe be under MORE regualtions than someone who owns say 20 porno shops each with 10's of 1000's of movies, mags etc? I might as well just go own a porno shop because acccording to these rules I'm not required to have records to make sure that the movies I'm selling don't have underage girls in them. Hmmmmmmmm.
                                                            Hey I'm not a fan of these rules at all, no more than anyone else here.

                                                            However, I still see a very logical difference between someone who inserts images onto a web page and publishes the page, and someone who works in a convenience store that sells Hustler magazine.

                                                            Personally I don't think requiring everyone who publishes porn to have copies of the ID's is a bad thing. When you think about it, the only way you can know for sure that the model is/was over 18 is to see the ID. Otherwise you're just taking the word of the photographer.

                                                            My problem with the rules is the burdensome way in which they're being implemented....copies of depictions cross referenced with urls and people having to put their home addresses on web pages and shit like that.
                                                            sig too big

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Tempest
                                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                              • May 2004
                                                              • 10217

                                                              #80
                                                              Originally posted by GatorB
                                                              OH bullshit. How else do you get pics to show up on the internet? That's like saying if a store makes a display for it's porno mags then they are required to comply with 2257 and they are not. Once again NO FUCKING DIFFERENCE.
                                                              I don't know the proper terminology, but I believe that a web page is considered published material, that's why copyright laws apply. And as such comparing it to a display for porno mags does not apply.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Nate-MM2
                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                • Sep 2002
                                                                • 263

                                                                #81
                                                                Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                For those NOT from the US that think this doesn't effect them.


                                                                In order to sell in the U.S. market, foreign
                                                                producers must comply with U.S. laws.
                                                                This rule applies equally to any sexually
                                                                explicit material introduced into the
                                                                stream of commerce in the United States
                                                                no matter where it was produced.
                                                                This shouldn't matter in a practical sense because non-US citizens aren't governed by US laws.

                                                                They would have a hard time (impossible) stopping somebody selling to US citizens on the internet. Online gaming has faced the same problem and came away with successful solutions.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Tempest
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • May 2004
                                                                  • 10217

                                                                  #82
                                                                  Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                  For those NOT from the US that think this doesn't effect them.

                                                                  In order to sell in the U.S. market, foreign
                                                                  producers must comply with U.S. laws.
                                                                  This rule applies equally to any sexually
                                                                  explicit material introduced into the
                                                                  stream of commerce in the United States
                                                                  no matter where it was produced.
                                                                  If you're just an affiliate, you're not selling anything. You're promoting/advertising someone elses site..

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • GatorB
                                                                    The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                    • 18208

                                                                    #83
                                                                    Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                    Personally I don't think requiring everyone who publishes porn to have copies of the ID's is a bad thing. When you think about it, the only way you can know for sure that the model is/was over 18 is to see the ID. Otherwise you're just taking the word of the photographer.
                                                                    And if the photogrhaper is LYING about the girls age what makes you think his records are going to be anymore accurate? Would he just have her come up with fake ID?

                                                                    My problem with the rules is the burdensome way in which they're being implemented....copies of depictions cross referenced with urls and people having to put their home addresses on web pages and shit like that.
                                                                    Which is why if there isn't an injunction I will make damn sure I don't have ANY webpages with ANY content on them.

                                                                    I for one am currious how many websites/webpages out there will actually be in compliance on June 23rd.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Snake Doctor
                                                                      I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                      • Mar 2001
                                                                      • 13449

                                                                      #84
                                                                      Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                      For those NOT from the US that think this doesn't effect them.


                                                                      In order to sell in the U.S. market, foreign
                                                                      producers must comply with U.S. laws.
                                                                      This rule applies equally to any sexually
                                                                      explicit material introduced into the
                                                                      stream of commerce in the United States
                                                                      no matter where it was produced.
                                                                      You forgot an important part of that.

                                                                      Foreign producers have the option of
                                                                      not complying with the rule, but then
                                                                      their access to the U.S. market is justly
                                                                      and lawfully prohibited.


                                                                      It also doesn't affect foreign webmasters the way you think. The DOJ specifically said "we do not currently excercise jurisdiction over foreign websites"

                                                                      The part that you're quoting refers to foreign producers who wish to sell their images/videos to U.S. companies. If they can't provide the documentation then the U.S. companies can't do business with them.
                                                                      sig too big

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Nate-MM2
                                                                        So Fucking Banned
                                                                        • Sep 2002
                                                                        • 263

                                                                        #85
                                                                        Originally posted by Tempest
                                                                        If you're just an affiliate, you're not selling anything. You're promoting/advertising someone elses site..
                                                                        It can't be applied to paysite owners either, or content producers for that matter.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • GatorB
                                                                          The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                          • Oct 2001
                                                                          • 18208

                                                                          #86
                                                                          Originally posted by Tempest
                                                                          If you're just an affiliate, you're not selling anything. You're promoting/advertising someone elses site..
                                                                          And don't they have a place in their stats that say SALES? But your not selling anyhting. Who here promotes websites for FREE here without any expectation of getting paid? Anyone?

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Snake Doctor
                                                                            I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                            • Mar 2001
                                                                            • 13449

                                                                            #87
                                                                            Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                            And if the photogrhaper is LYING about the girls age what makes you think his records are going to be anymore accurate? Would he just have her come up with fake ID?.
                                                                            You're really reaching now man.

                                                                            It doesn't matter what he does, what matters is that you asked for and received a copy of a government issued ID. If for whatever reason the ID is a fake, you still did your due diligence and any lawyer worth his salt could defend you easily.
                                                                            sig too big

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • GatorB
                                                                              The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                              • Oct 2001
                                                                              • 18208

                                                                              #88
                                                                              Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                              It also doesn't affect foreign webmasters the way you think. The DOJ specifically said "we do not currently excercise jurisdiction over foreign websites"
                                                                              So basically they are admiting they are dumbfucks because there is no way this law can do what they want it to do if over half the websites on the planet can not be made to comply and all it does is put Americans at a disadvatage. Good going Bush.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Snake Doctor
                                                                                I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                • Mar 2001
                                                                                • 13449

                                                                                #89
                                                                                Originally posted by Tempest
                                                                                If you're just an affiliate, you're not selling anything. You're promoting/advertising someone elses site..
                                                                                They're referring to foreign producers selling content to secondary producers in the U.S.....they're not referring to foreign websites selling subscriptions.
                                                                                sig too big

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • GatorB
                                                                                  The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                                  • Oct 2001
                                                                                  • 18208

                                                                                  #90
                                                                                  Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                                  You're really reaching now man.

                                                                                  It doesn't matter what he does, what matters is that you asked for and received a copy of a government issued ID. If for whatever reason the ID is a fake, you still did your due diligence and any lawyer worth his salt could defend you easily.
                                                                                  Ok so now I can go and ask any producer for a model's ID and I can get it? Hmmmm better hope I'm not a stalker. And if they are not obligated to provide with such ID then how do I get this ID?

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Tempest
                                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                    • May 2004
                                                                                    • 10217

                                                                                    #91
                                                                                    Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                                    And don't they have a place in their stats that say SALES? But your not selling anyhting. Who here promotes websites for FREE here without any expectation of getting paid? Anyone?
                                                                                    I didn't get the sale.. the sponsor did.. and I get paid a commision... You're just ranting now..

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Snake Doctor
                                                                                      I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                      • Mar 2001
                                                                                      • 13449

                                                                                      #92
                                                                                      Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                                      So basically they are admiting they are dumbfucks because there is no way this law can do what they want it to do if over half the websites on the planet can not be made to comply and all it does is put Americans at a disadvatage. Good going Bush.
                                                                                      The purpose of the law (which is a good law....it's the regulations written to specify enforcement of the law that are fucked up) is to ensure that children aren't used as participants in pornography.

                                                                                      U.S. laws are intended to protect U.S. children, protecting children that live in other countries is the job of the other governments.

                                                                                      sig too big

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • GatorB
                                                                                        The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                                        • Oct 2001
                                                                                        • 18208

                                                                                        #93
                                                                                        Originally posted by Tempest
                                                                                        I didn't get the sale.. the sponsor did.. and I get paid a commision... You're just ranting now..
                                                                                        Yeah ok. So a car SALESman doesn't actually get SALES because he doesn't own the cars the dealership does?

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Nate-MM2
                                                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                                                          • Sep 2002
                                                                                          • 263

                                                                                          #94
                                                                                          Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                                          Ok so now I can go and ask any producer for a model's ID and I can get it? Hmmmm better hope I'm not a stalker. And if they are not obligated to provide with such ID then how do I get this ID?
                                                                                          You actually have to buy a license for the set first... you can't just go asking at random.

                                                                                          I doubt many producers will be providing un-edited information to Joe Webmaster that just paid $27 for 3 sets of photo content.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • GatorB
                                                                                            The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                                            • Oct 2001
                                                                                            • 18208

                                                                                            #95
                                                                                            Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                                            The purpose of the law (which is a good law....it's the regulations written to specify enforcement of the law that are fucked up) is to ensure that children aren't used as participants in pornography.

                                                                                            U.S. laws are intended to protect U.S. children, protecting children that live in other countries is the job of the other governments.

                                                                                            These laws ALREADY exist and have existed. The original 2257 laws have been in existence for well over a dozen years. What is wrong with those. What flaw is in those laws that they new ones? How would they know of such flaws since there has NEVER ever been ONE inspection of 2257 records since thier inception.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • chadglni
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Dec 2002
                                                                                              • 6924

                                                                                              #96
                                                                                              Originally posted by Nate-MM2
                                                                                              You actually have to buy a license for the set first... you can't just go asking at random.

                                                                                              I doubt many producers will be providing un-edited information to Joe Webmaster that just paid $27 for 3 sets of photo content.
                                                                                              What exactly would they edit? They have to give you the girls real name for you to be compliant, anyone with some sense can find her from there.


                                                                                              Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • GatorB
                                                                                                The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                                                • Oct 2001
                                                                                                • 18208

                                                                                                #97
                                                                                                Originally posted by Nate-MM2
                                                                                                You actually have to buy a license for the set first... you can't just go asking at random.

                                                                                                I doubt many producers will be providing un-edited information to Joe Webmaster that just paid $27 for 3 sets of photo content.
                                                                                                Yes but doesn't the DOJ want the info not blacked out shit? Oh I see they come I give them the "edited" info and they haul ME off for having "edited" info and not the real thing.

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Snake Doctor
                                                                                                  I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                                  • Mar 2001
                                                                                                  • 13449

                                                                                                  #98
                                                                                                  Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                                                  Ok so now I can go and ask any producer for a model's ID and I can get it? Hmmmm better hope I'm not a stalker. And if they are not obligated to provide with such ID then how do I get this ID?
                                                                                                  I posted this earlier....dude you really need to take a chill pill BTW.

                                                                                                  In the comments section the DOJ said that if a primary producer refuses to provide a secondary producer with documentation, they're in violation of the regulations.

                                                                                                  Now me personally, I'm not going to wait for the DOJ to show up at my door and then say "I asked for the ID but didn't get it"
                                                                                                  I'm going to remove any content that I don't have ID's for (assuming the regs go into effect as scheduled)
                                                                                                  However, if you paid money for content and now the producer refuses to give you the docs in violation of the law you may have grounds to sue and recover the monies you paid for the content plus attorney fees.

                                                                                                  (Remember, I'm not a lawyer, I just play one on TV.....don't take ANYTHING I say as legal advice.)
                                                                                                  sig too big

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Tempest
                                                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                    • May 2004
                                                                                                    • 10217

                                                                                                    #99
                                                                                                    Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                                                    They're referring to foreign producers selling content to secondary producers in the U.S.....they're not referring to foreign websites selling subscriptions.
                                                                                                    Not sure I agree with that since they use the term "producer" to refer to both secondary and primary producers in some places.. and they seem to be making it clear that if you sell to the US, they expect you to meet the "labeling" requirements like any other product being sold in the US... Of course, they then go on to say they don't exercise jurisdiction so who the hell knows..

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Nate-MM2
                                                                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                                                                      • Sep 2002
                                                                                                      • 263

                                                                                                      #100
                                                                                                      Originally posted by chadglni
                                                                                                      What exactly would they edit? They have to give you the girls real name for you to be compliant, anyone with some sense can find her from there.
                                                                                                      They won't give you the real name.

                                                                                                      If you force the issue they'll just tell you to fuck off. Keeping a steady stream of fresh models keeps the big buyers coming back. They aren't going to risk pissing off a model to satisfy a webmaster making a $30 content purchase.

                                                                                                      The trusted buyers & paysite owners will be the ones getting the documents for compliance.

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...