Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RawAlex
You guys are reading it backwards here. Directnic is a US entity, and they are bound by the laws of the US. Providing domains for illegal material (such as scat or bestiality) could put them in the shitter legally, regardless of where it is hosted. They would be aiding the distribution of this material.
I don't like it, but they may have little choice.
Here is the important question: WHAT WAS ON THOSE DOMAINS?
|
I don't think that is correct -- in fact its way too far reaching --
Would Sony be liable because they make camcorders that were used to make obscene videos?
No Way.
Would a hotel be crminally guilty or liable if he shoots inside the hotel and the video is later deemed to be obscene (illegal)?
A criminal case conviction requires a guilty state of mind. "Knowingly" that a crime is being comitted.