I don't understand why you would post the link to this article and then make statements that seem to disagree with Bush and his idea to simply make the produces of porn prove the age of the models.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Producers of sexually explicit material must be able to prove the subjects depicted in their photographs and films are adults, according to new government regulations approved Tuesday by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Porn producers must keep detailed records that verify the identity and age of each individual depicted. The new regulations, to be published in the Federal Register, also update the definition of "pornography producers" to include producers of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct published on the Internet.
You responded like this:
We are all fucked now...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/ch...regs/index.html
He's got plenty of time, judicial appointments, and further regulations left to hammer us out of existance base over the next couple years to appease his right wing Christian.
Congratulations assholes.
...Watch out people, Geroge Bush is trying to make child porn harder to produce in America...
You guys are fucking pathetic. Lets talk about the subject rather than to declare everything that Bush has to say as absolutely wrong.
It's been taken to the point as to where George Bush doesn't approve of child porn, so democrats consider that mentality wrong and try to protest the protection of children in America from being in the porn industry as illegal models.
...or, you're just a stupid fuck that posted the article without reading it.
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Producers of sexually explicit material must be able to prove the subjects depicted in their photographs and films are adults, according to new government regulations approved Tuesday by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Porn producers must keep detailed records that verify the identity and age of each individual depicted. The new regulations, to be published in the Federal Register, also update the definition of "pornography producers" to include producers of visual depictions of sexually explicit conduct published on the Internet.
You responded like this:
We are all fucked now...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/17/ch...regs/index.html
He's got plenty of time, judicial appointments, and further regulations left to hammer us out of existance base over the next couple years to appease his right wing Christian.
Congratulations assholes.
...Watch out people, Geroge Bush is trying to make child porn harder to produce in America...
You guys are fucking pathetic. Lets talk about the subject rather than to declare everything that Bush has to say as absolutely wrong.
It's been taken to the point as to where George Bush doesn't approve of child porn, so democrats consider that mentality wrong and try to protest the protection of children in America from being in the porn industry as illegal models.
...or, you're just a stupid fuck that posted the article without reading it.
the regs DO NOT protect children whatsoever and you should have your ass kicked and if you are not banned for accusing somebdoy of that then this board is lame
Comment