|
i dont get what your trying to say...
he clearly got it backwards .. if you wanted to trap people "above" you would try and bomb low not high, but i dont get what that has to do with WTC ? he was talking about various "plots" not wtc...
I'm not entirely sure all the wtc buildings collapse was due to the planes or fires but this certainly isnt anything credible..
I think theres a few things we can be certain of.. the planes certainly shouldnt have caused all the buildings to collapse.. certainly not wtc7 .
but there are various aspects involved.. the owner of wtc clearly said they made the decision to pull wtc7 down themselves so its a nobrainer that one was pulled and they are lying about it now for ??? reason..
as far as 1 & 2 .. they shouldnt have fallen , but that doesnt nec mean there was explosives involved. I would certainly think if there was it should be easy enough to detect the presence of explosives considering the amount that would have been used to pull something like this off. I would point my finger closer to the fact the buildings were prob built unsafely and the american government didnt want to make a stink becaus it would downplay the effectiveness of the terrorists .. i.e. people would say it wouldnt have been so bad if not for shoddy american building then you would have 2 people to blame.. us and them.. easier to blame 1 guy
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
|