FSC to take on DOJ's new Sec 2257 Regs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Redrob
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2004
    • 4791

    #1

    FSC to take on DOJ's new Sec 2257 Regs

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    May 18, 2005


    TRADE GROUP TO CHALLENGE NEW SECTION 2257 RULES

    Free Speech Coalition, the adult entertainment trade association, announced plans today to file a legal challenge to the Justice Department?s new rules for enforcement of the Federal Labeling and Recordkeeping Law known as 18 U.S.C. Section 2257.

    ?Just as we feared,? FSC Executive Director Michelle Freridge said,
    ?Attorney General Gonzales has signed a final rule implementing the new provisions of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act. We are prepared to challenge these unconstitutional and burdensome regulations in court.?

    The law requires producers of sexually explicit material to maintain records proving that performers in those depictions are not minors, but the detailed and extensive records that the law requires create a daunting record-keeping task, particularly when applied to the Internet. And the penalties are harsh. Even with no minors involved in the production - indeed, even if all performers are over 40 -- a first-offense paperwork error can still mean five years in federal prison.

    Although FSC is on record in strong opposition to the use of minors in sexual material, Freridge said these new regulations go too far. According to Freridge, the proposed guidelines, which were initially released to the public in August of 2004, go beyond reasonable administrative requirements and create an excessively burdensome paperwork system that may violate the privacy rights and personal safety of performers. On a practical level, many producers would find it difficult to comply with the highly technical requirements.

    ?In addition, we really need to examine the impact of the new regulations on webmasters, since internet content is apparently going to be the focus of the new DOJ task force,? suggested Larry Walters, a well known First Amendment attorney who represents a number of adult webmasters and internet companies and is a member of FSC?s Internet Committee.

    ?Under the current unfriendly administration,? Freridge commented, ?The law would become a tool for selective enforcement by the Justice Department and a technical trap for legal adult businesses that have no connection whatsoever to child pornography.?

    FSC intends to test the validity of the new rules by filing multiple lawsuits, asking for a temporary restraining order and an injunction. By taking swift proactive steps, FSC hopes to protect its members from prosecution, while challenging the law as unconstitutional.

    To view the proposed guidelines released to the public in 2004, as well as FSC?s response to those guidelines, visit www.freespeechcoalition.com The version signed by Attorney General Gonzales today will be published in the Federal Register soon, and available on the FSC website shortly thereafter.

    Free Speech Coalition is the trade organization of the adult entertainment industry. Its mission is to safeguard the industry from oppressive governmental regulation and to promote good business practices within the industry.


    http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/
  • iBanker
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2004
    • 2758

    #2
    sig spot
    www.JasonandAlex.com
    Christopher's ICQ: 268-843-170

    Comment

    • StuartD
      Sofa King Band
      • Jul 2002
      • 29903

      #3
      yup, but don't expect it to save anything, just change some things.

      Chances are that the most that would come of it is minor changes... making things "more reasonable" but still, you'll have to be pretty accurate in your paper work at the outcome.
      This is me on facebook
      This is me on twitter

      Comment

      • Bansheelinks
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2003
        • 6023

        #4


        Comment

        • Bugbee
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2004
          • 4609

          #5
          http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=8789
          Stephen Bugbee
          www.x2k.com
          ICQ# FUCK ICQ
          bugbee AT x2k dot com

          X2K consulting and media services - specializing in business development, technology and profitability of your new or existing products and services

          X2K MEDIA SUITE

          Need a high risk merchant account? Contact me..

          Are you a donor? Have a heart and help someone in need. Go to the DMV and be sure you are a donor, it saves lives!!!!

          Comment

          • seeric
            ..........
            • Aug 2004
            • 41917

            #6
            werd. this has been planned since the proposal announcements over a year ago. the challenge that is.

            Comment

            • MandyBlake
              The one and only!
              • Nov 2002
              • 17761

              #7
              well i hope they are able to do something.
              we will obviously comply, but it's a huge task to undertake and maintain.
              i'm sooo glad that most of the content on my site is me. lol
              Mandy's Playhouse
              Her First Fat Girl
              If you're interested in promoting my sites, ICQ me! 178411921

              Comment

              • Redrob
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2004
                • 4791

                #8
                As I understand the situation:

                If you are a member of FSC....

                And, FSC files a challenge to the new regs.....

                the FSC will ask for an injunction from enforcement.....

                the injunction will only protect members of FSC for sure....

                so....

                why wouldn't you join FSC today?? Talk about value!!

                Comment

                • tony299
                  lurker
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 57021

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Redrob
                  As I understand the situation:

                  If you are a member of FSC....

                  And, FSC files a challenge to the new regs.....

                  the FSC will ask for an injunction from enforcement.....

                  the injunction will only protect members of FSC for sure....

                  so....

                  why wouldn't you join FSC today?? Talk about value!!
                  people should join but a injunction would protect everyone in ths case

                  Comment

                  • After Shock Media
                    It's coming look busy
                    • Mar 2001
                    • 35299

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Redrob
                    As I understand the situation:

                    If you are a member of FSC....

                    And, FSC files a challenge to the new regs.....

                    the FSC will ask for an injunction from enforcement.....

                    the injunction will only protect members of FSC for sure....

                    so....

                    why wouldn't you join FSC today?? Talk about value!!
                    A limited injunction only preventing enforcement against members of the group filing the injunction? Do such things really exsist?

                    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                    Comment

                    • Thomas1007
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 5542

                      #11
                      Nice
                      gotta update some shit to be sure
                      BUY THIS SPOT CONTACT ME FOR DETAILS


                      Comment

                      • StuartD
                        Sofa King Band
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 29903

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Redrob
                        the FSC will ask for an injunction from enforcement.....

                        the injunction will only protect members of FSC for sure....
                        This is why only people who know the law should try to give advice or even try to interpret the law themselves.
                        This is me on facebook
                        This is me on twitter

                        Comment

                        • Redrob
                          Confirmed User
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 4791

                          #13
                          I am not a lawyer, but,.....as I understand injunctions...

                          an injunction given to a particular organization would only protect the members of that organization for sure. It would be up to the DOJ, whether or not, to prosecute non-members of the group.

                          However, that being said.....If an organization receives an injunction, more than likely but not guaranteed, all enforcement actions would be stopped pending the outcome of the case.

                          Again, I'm not a lawyer and I'd suggest you ask one.

                          Comment

                          Working...