Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scootermuze
Why does it have to be about engineers and scientists concluding what it probably was?
Loizeaux, who cleaned up the bombed Federal Building in Oklahoma City, arrived on the WTC site two days later and wrote the clean-up plan for the entire operation.
He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC..
Hmm.. no jet fuel or aluminum there..
And on a different note..
While steel is often tested for evidence of explosions, despite numerous eyewitness reports of explosions in the towers, the engineers involved in the FEMA-sponsored building assessment did no such tests.
So much for thorough testing by good ol' Uncle Sam..
[Awaiting cocky comebacks and a drawn out philosophical reply... ]
|
I guess we just trust different sources. I trust experts who have loads of experience in science and engineering. You trust one or two guys who made a quote that gets blown out of proportion.
Most of the claims of molten steel are often seen as people who don't know the difference in incandescent steel and molten steel.
But to keep this going, which theory are you going with, the explosion one, or the molten steel one. You technically can't have one with the other as explosions don't cause molten steel.