Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dollarmansteve
CLASSIC conspiracy paranoia.
It is impossible to present any facts to the insane conpiracy theorist. Anyone who presents scientific facts will just be laballed a co-conspirator.
|
That single statement, whoever wrote it, is a mere cheap shot..
If undisputable facts were presented, there'd be no theories of conspiracy..
You use the word, 'labelled' in a probable manner, yet you try to, 'label' all theorists as insane..
Yep.. there are some nut cases out there, but there are also some highly educated, and in some cases, highly prominent figures who don't go along with the official report.. And I really hope that report is not what you're referring to when you suggest, "scientific fact".
Reading through it you find statements like, "The failure
most likely occured..., "An increased edge distance
might have prevented... "The remaining fuel
is believed to have...., "NIST?s
working hypothesis for the collapse of WTC 7...." and numerous, "Will require further study" type entries..
True.. there are some scientific facts, but they are shown to exist on both sides of the fence...