Obscenity Arrests and Employees question - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

freeme

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 939
Share

Post
#1

Obscenity Arrests and Employees question

09-08-2006, 07:59 AM

I saw the thread about the brazilian guy that got arrested in Fl. on obscenity charges

Do you think the US Govt would only focus arrests on the principle owners of the company? Or could they turn their focus on employees of the company working in or traveling to the US if they are promoting this content to US webmasters?
Tags: None
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#2

09-08-2006, 08:37 AM

This is a good question

I would like to hear the answer as im sure there are plently of acct reps who work for US companies with extreme content
Comment
GlydeGirl

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 1516
Share

Post
#3

09-08-2006, 08:40 AM

I agree... that IS a good question.

I don't have a legal background, but I imagine that employees are not directly responsible for the legalities of their jobs; they are paid to do tasks as directed rather than decide the course of the business. A contractor, on the other hand, I imagine COULD be held legally liable.
Comment
SGS

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 5176
Share

Post
#4

09-08-2006, 08:42 AM

Originally posted by MaskTVMaura

I agree... that IS a good question.

I don't have a legal background, but I imagine that employees are not directly responsible for the legalities of their jobs; they are paid to do tasks as directed rather than decide the course of the business. A contractor, on the other hand, I imagine COULD be held legally liable.

So if you are a getaway driver you should be ok?

See sig...
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#5

09-08-2006, 08:44 AM

Originally posted by SGS

So if you are a getaway driver you should be ok?

right

or for that matter a runner for a drug dealer

This issue should be a concern to alot of us
Comment
ztik

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 5196
Share

Post
#6

09-08-2006, 08:46 AM

I would say if your working for the company IE doing paper work, html or w/e you would be ok. But if you are participating the illegal activitey I would think you would be just as liable.

.
Comment
GlydeGirl

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 1516
Share

Post
#7

09-08-2006, 08:47 AM

Getaway drivers and drug dealers ARE contractors! LOL
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#8

09-08-2006, 08:48 AM

Originally posted by MaskTVMaura

Getaway drivers and drug dealers ARE contractors! LOL

LOL

thats a good one Maura
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#9

09-08-2006, 08:50 AM

Originally posted by ztik

I would say if your working for the company IE doing paper work, html or w/e you would be ok. But if you are participating the illegal activitey I would think you would be just as liable.

Define participating

shooting content?
marketing paysites that are considered Obscene
Designing paysites with said content
ect ect ect

where will they draw the line
Comment
Klen

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 32234
Share

Post
#10

09-08-2006, 08:50 AM

Originally posted by MaskTVMaura

Getaway drivers and drug dealers ARE contractors! LOL

Funny but true
Comment
Pleasurepays

BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11913
Share

Post
#11

09-08-2006, 08:51 AM

Originally posted by MaskTVMaura

I agree... that IS a good question.

I don't have a legal background, but I imagine that employees are not directly responsible for the legalities of their jobs; they are paid to do tasks as directed rather than decide the course of the business. A contractor, on the other hand, I imagine COULD be held legally liable.

the "i was just following orders" defense didn't work well for the Nazis at Neuremburg.
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#12

09-08-2006, 08:52 AM

Originally posted by MaskTVMaura

I agree... that IS a good question.

I don't have a legal background, but I imagine that employees are not directly responsible for the legalities of their jobs; they are paid to do tasks as directed rather than decide the course of the business. A contractor, on the other hand, I imagine COULD be held legally liable.

Ok so an employer tells an employee to do somehting that is illegal

The employee does it.

Is he obsolved from legal risk because his employer told him to do it?
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#13

09-08-2006, 08:53 AM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

the "i was just following orders" defense didn't work well for the Nazis at Neuremburg.

Thanks JR

My point exactly

How many US and Intl sponsors have extreme content with employees that work and or travel to the US

There must be hundreds of programs
Comment
DateDoc

Outside looking in.

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 14243
Share

Post
#14

09-08-2006, 08:55 AM

Originally posted by Forest

Ok so an employer tells an employee to do somehting that is illegal

The employee does it.

Is he obsolved from legal risk because his employer told him to do it?

Nope.....
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#15

09-08-2006, 09:33 AM

Originally posted by BusterPorn

Nope.....

so then a rep working for a company promoting obscene materials to their wm could be held liable for the actions of the company
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30157
Share

Post
#16

09-08-2006, 09:41 AM

Originally posted by MaskTVMaura

I agree... that IS a good question.

I don't have a legal background, but I imagine that employees are not directly responsible for the legalities of their jobs; they are paid to do tasks as directed rather than decide the course of the business. A contractor, on the other hand, I imagine COULD be held legally liable.

Well, you are wrong, at least here in Canada ....

When I got busted on showing an edited ( no cumshots, no shots of genital ) VHS in a topless bar ( Les Amazones ) , I got charged by the Queen for 159a or something similar ( distributing/circulating obscene material ) .

They also charged the doorman of the bar ( because they claim he was the one allowing the showing ) , my driver ( because he transported from point A to B ) and my secretary because she had actually prepared the shipping/invoice documents.

The cops told me that if I pleaded guilty, they would dismiss the charges against the staff ... I told them to

After losing in first instance, I brought it to appeal and got acquitted ... in 1982, 25-30,000 layer fees later...

So I would say that yes.

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
Phoenix

BACON BACON BACON

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 35475
Share

Post
#17

09-08-2006, 09:49 AM

no one said this was a squeeky clean industry

but i do thnik the people who made the lionshare of the money should be held liable..lol

Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Comment
After Shock Media

It's coming look busy

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 35299
Share

Post
#18

09-08-2006, 10:01 AM

Typically you bust lower down the chain, then offer deals to the pions to have a better case against the larger target.

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
Comment
HighSociety

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2005

Posts: 1786
Share

Post
#19

09-08-2006, 10:03 AM

if you know what was going on then that is a crime, they have taken down large groups for just that,

http://www.highsociety.com
http://www.playgirl.com
http://www.cheri.com

Jonathan "JC" Maldini
ICQ: 223 643
Comment
stag44

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 187
Share

Post
#20

09-08-2006, 10:14 AM

Originally posted by Forest

so then a rep working for a company promoting obscene materials to their wm could be held liable for the actions of the company

Its a question of degree............ If the police are looking to close down an operation and the rep is the only one based in the US then he will be done... as he has initiated actions.....
If they get the owner, content provider, wm and rep in 1 fell swoop i expect they could be charged with the same offence, but the sentences would reflect the levels of ownership, responsibility etc.....

|Always Looking for Good Sites to Review|Always Looking for Great Quality Links|
|Always Looking to Buy Great Quality Advertising Space|
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#21

09-08-2006, 10:16 AM

What about companies processing for these sites

can they be held accountable?
Comment
After Shock Media

It's coming look busy

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 35299
Share

Post
#22

09-08-2006, 10:22 AM

Originally posted by Forest

What about companies processing for these sites

can they be held accountable?

One thing I have learned about the US courts is that anything is possible when it comes to prosecutions, specially if they work in that damn conspiracy charge.

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
Comment
Quentin

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 1280
Share

Post
#23

09-08-2006, 10:46 AM

Attorney Larry Walters addresses this in an FAQ-style article that has been published on YNOT, and which he has done as a power point presentation at several adult shows.

You can read the full article here and here's an excerpt relevant to the employee question:

++++++++++++

11. Only the owners or day-to-day managers of a website operation can be charged with obscenity.

False.

First, any individual or company up the chain, from production, through distribution, to retail sale, can be charged with obscenity violations. Only the end user, in the privacy of his or her own home, is safe from obscenity threats, due to the right of privacy. In addition, the government often seeks to indict as many individual participants in any particular case, as they can legitimately get away with. This usually includes webmasters, designers, assistants, spouses, bookkeepers, managers, owners, operators, consultants, and any other individual with virtually any degree of decision making authority. The idea is to compel underlings to provide favorable testimony against more important figures to the operation. Often this becomes a race to the prosecutor?s office, with many co-defendants seeking to be the first to obtain an immunity deal and turn ?State?s evidence.? Sometimes, criminal charges are only threatened, and never pursued, in exchange for an agreement to provide favorable testimony. What will the people in your organization do?

++++++++++++

Everyone interested in the 'obscenity' issue should take the time to read Larry's piece. It's not that long, and addresses the major points very clearly and concisely.

- Q.

Q. Boyer
Comment
Pleasurepays

BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11913
Share

Post
#24

09-08-2006, 10:51 AM

Originally posted by stag44

Its a question of degree............ If the police are looking to close down an operation and the rep is the only one based in the US then he will be done... as he has initiated actions.....
If they get the owner, content provider, wm and rep in 1 fell swoop i expect they could be charged with the same offence, but the sentences would reflect the levels of ownership, responsibility etc.....

look at past obscenity prosecutions.... i don't think you will find many employees arrested for a simple obscenity prosecution. (with the exception of the ray guhn clowns saying "uhmm.. yeah, its all 100% bullshit... and all the guns and drugs were totally legal") - which isn't only an obscenity case.

its definately an interesting question, but i just can't imagine a situation where an employee of a foreign company would get arrested in the US for that companies activities unless it was a very extreme situation and that employee was proven to be 100% complicit in the commission of illegal acts on behalf of the company and it was very clear that employee knew they were breaking the law. i dont mean gray "obscenity" type stuff... i mean it would have to be something much more black and white and defensible by the government to prosecute such a case. furthermore, i doubt they would ever attempt to test questionable laws by prosecuting a non US citizen. the government likes high profile, slam dunk cases. obscenity is generally a loser for them unless they can attach other prosecutable, felony counts.

just my opinion. i'm not a lawyer... i'm just an asshole
Comment
After Shock Media

It's coming look busy

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 35299
Share

Post
#25

09-08-2006, 11:01 AM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

look at past obscenity prosecutions.... i don't think you will find many employees arrested for a simple obscenity prosecution. (with the exception of the ray guhn clowns saying "uhmm.. yeah, its all 100% bullshit... and all the guns and drugs were totally legal") - which isn't only an obscenity case.

You may wish to look a bit further back in adult history, pre adult internet times.

[email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#26

09-08-2006, 11:24 AM

Originally posted by Quentin

Attorney Larry Walters addresses this in an FAQ-style article that has been published on YNOT, and which he has done as a power point presentation at several adult shows.

You can read the full article here and here's an excerpt relevant to the employee question:

++++++++++++

11. Only the owners or day-to-day managers of a website operation can be charged with obscenity.

False.

First, any individual or company up the chain, from production, through distribution, to retail sale, can be charged with obscenity violations. Only the end user, in the privacy of his or her own home, is safe from obscenity threats, due to the right of privacy. In addition, the government often seeks to indict as many individual participants in any particular case, as they can legitimately get away with. This usually includes webmasters, designers, assistants, spouses, bookkeepers, managers, owners, operators, consultants, and any other individual with virtually any degree of decision making authority. The idea is to compel underlings to provide favorable testimony against more important figures to the operation. Often this becomes a race to the prosecutor?s office, with many co-defendants seeking to be the first to obtain an immunity deal and turn ?State?s evidence.? Sometimes, criminal charges are only threatened, and never pursued, in exchange for an agreement to provide favorable testimony. What will the people in your organization do?

++++++++++++

Everyone interested in the 'obscenity' issue should take the time to read Larry's piece. It's not that long, and addresses the major points very clearly and concisely.

- Q.

Good article Q

Thanx
Comment
shermo
Share

Post
#27

09-08-2006, 12:23 PM

What if that "employee" isn't legally employed? What if that rep is just 1099'd like every other affiliate?
Comment
Kimmykim

bitchslapping zebras!!!!!

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 16015
Share

Post
#28

09-08-2006, 12:39 PM

Originally posted by Pleasurepays

look at past obscenity prosecutions.... i don't think you will find many employees arrested for a simple obscenity prosecution. (with the exception of the ray guhn clowns saying "uhmm.. yeah, its all 100% bullshit... and all the guns and drugs were totally legal") - which isn't only an obscenity case.

Not true, unfortunately. If you go back to the days of Meese, when there were plenty of attempted obscenity cases, you'll find that Russ Hampshire -- VCA -- did 18 months in prison to keep the gov't from going after his employees on his plea bargain agreement.
Comment
Forest

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 9135
Share

Post
#29

09-08-2006, 12:45 PM

Originally posted by shermsshack

What if that "employee" isn't legally employed? What if that rep is just 1099'd like every other affiliate?

According to the article Q posted it seems that ANYONE connected to the obscene content in anyway can be held accountable

Just because your an Independant contractor with 1099 status doest obsolve you from the legal issues
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30157
Share

Post
#30

09-08-2006, 01:33 PM

Originally posted by Kimmykim

you'll find that Russ Hampshire -- VCA -- did 18 months in prison to keep the gov't from going after his employees on his plea bargain agreement.

I remember that. I had diner with him at the VSDA in Chicago, a few weeks before he " reported " for his prison term .... ( I had just bought the theatrical rights of Skin Tight from him ).
And they were the biggest in Adult .. as well as mainstream duplication ...

But kids of today have no idea how it was ... they think double-anal gang bang was the norm ....

Your post are always to the point

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
shermo
Share

Post
#31

09-08-2006, 02:11 PM

Originally posted by Forest

According to the article Q posted it seems that ANYONE connected to the obscene content in anyway can be held accountable

Just because your an Independant contractor with 1099 status doest obsolve you from the legal issues

So there you go... That would put affiliates in the line of fire just as much as a rep that is 1099'd and not legally employed.
Comment
Lord Aga

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 479
Share

Post
#32

09-08-2006, 03:03 PM

You would probably get off if you squealed like a pig! lol
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...