View Single Post
Old 09-07-2006, 06:36 PM  
elitegirls
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 962

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webby
Pulling the words of the messenger apart - Jeff King - does not change the facts.

Construction like the WTC towers (and this is no different to similar construction elsewhere) comprises of a "mesh" of steel. Penetration of that mesh has never been known to cause the total collapse of a construction anywhere - even when forced with much higher impacts in earthquakes than that of an aircraft.

So far, there is no transparency - there are lies of course issued at various pionts - example being those of FEMA "the air is safe to breath" and where the FEMA report was edited by White House Counsel to avoid stating the truth.

This is like trusting a second user car salesman to be truthful. It was the same car salesman and sales staff who verified the evidence Iraq had WMD. It was the same car salesman and sales staff who made claims of no secret camps and torture centers. It was the same car salesman and staff who vowed to capture the alleged perp, bin Laden. It was the same car salesman and staff who helped in the aftermath of Katrina.

Bottom line.. the car salesman has no cred and can't be trusted. Whether the WTC towers have "meaning" attached or not, - the fact that there is no transparency will obviously lead to conjucture/conspiracy theories. It does not take a scientist to explain why such structures "should" not collapse - tho it may take a scientist to explain why the laws of gravity were suspended on 9/11.
right webby, good post!
__________________
elitegirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote