View Single Post
Old 09-02-2006, 12:48 PM  
dig420
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidd
I will let you re-read the above post... ponder it... and then let you consult the facts.

You also have a bad habit of not addressing all of my rebuttals. I will assume you agree fully with my comment on Jimmy Carter and Dan Rather. It is becoming easier and easier knocking down your points with facts.

Using your statement you must also agree that Bill Clinton was in office during the Internet revolution so the economic windfall that took place during this time can not be attributed to him.
You have no rebuttal. You just say the name Dan Rather in a smartass way, whose only crime was in focusing attention on the fact that Bush went AWOL during vietnam.

You can make any excuse you want regarding the fact that Clinton presided over a very prosperous economy. The fact is he did, and Bush has fucked it up, and that's that.

And the main reason we didn't get the hostages back with Carter is because Reagan-Bush were in contact with the hostage takers and worked out a deal not to release them until Ronnie stepped into office.
dig420 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote