Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChrisExtreme
Yes, you keep thinking that negative exposure is going to be good for your program in the long run.
Buy the way, why don't you explain the quote in my sig to the people here on GFY. I'm sure a few people here would be interested in hearing how you bragged about being about to shave sales from your affiliates. Then again stealing from your affiliates is nothing new for you.
|
If only you were worth suing.
So for those who want to know.
Some accused me of shaving because I has an alternative biller and links on the paysite, all were plain to see and nothing was hidden. They called this shaving.
I defended myself by saying that if I had any intentions of shaving I could do it by getting my programmers to build something into the site.
If this moron had a clue he would realise that I would not of made such a statement if I was doing anything under hand.
If this moron had a clue he would do a search on Netpond where I quite clearly state we are getting more and more traffic from sources we cannot identify. Affiliate conversions are still the same, this is extra traffic.
Do a search on here and I think you will find the same thing.
ANYONE WHO THINKS I'M NOT 100% HONEST PLEASE DO LIKE CHRIS DOES. BY NOT SENDING US TRAFFIC.
You can of course make statements like his if you are not worth suing.