What always amazes me is how easy people think shooting porn is. Shooting naked girls is easy, shooting porn is hard. What's the difference. Struggling along with every other clown and making a good living.
People ramble on and on about the importance of text. Then use images that will instantly turn a viewer off. ESTABLISHED FACT. The first impression counts over everything else. So if you have images that don't deliver then telling a surfer the girl is the hottest, most fuckable, sexiest and demanding your cock NOW. He surfer thinks you're lying. He saw the pictures and thinks what the fuck are you smoking.
Then he thinks, "Yes I've heard that 100 times today".
Why do people put more importance and stress the need to get a gallery right and ignore the fundamentals of porn. Which are.
It has to have a fantasy behind it that gets a guys dick hard.
These are nice amateur pictures that any guy with some pretty girls could shoot. but not porn.
If you think the 13th set was as hot as the first I shudder to think how bad was the first. A girl should be warmed up by the second set and tired by the fifth. That's her job, that's my job, that's what creating porn is about.
You are looking to get some emotions, message and imagination stimulant from the models, the softer the content the stronger the tease message. If you are working properly you will tire after about 5 sets, the model will tire, the whole thing goes down the tubes. You can do the whole thing on auto pilot, but then you end up with none of the sets being right.
Shooting porn is 20 times harder than making a gallery, shooting a picture of a naked girl is 20 times easier than making a gallery, just costs more. That is why good porn content is king, simply because it's tougher to do.
OK now you can tell me how scared I am that you will come and take away all my business.