Quote:
|
Originally Posted by elron
That's right , we all wanted to see her own view , the oppositve which you call "views" would be to insult her , and defend the islam , that's not what we wanted to hear .
I still dont see why would this be considered as "$50 defective edit suite" .
Admit that her words are very sour to you , and by telling is that it was "edited" you turn the subject to a whole different matter - the propaganda of memri , so we wont discuss about islam , but on memri .
Isn't that what you wanted ?  |
"You" may want to hear her - fine. That does not make it a rational or balance view in any way. "We" may want to hear other than just one side - that is what fair and balanced editoring reporting is all about.
I really don't have any opinions to offer either for or against - when the material is hacked - it's hard to see any balanced view. My opinions don't matter a shit either way - I was simply pointing out the edited source of this material and that it has no credibility.
It has everything to do with the source - eg MEMRI - what do you expect from a Washington based lobby group with aims to place a good light on US policy in the Middle East? There is nada more need be said on that - it's clear as day - the source has no cred.
Sure.. if you want to watch one-sided unbalanced reporting of a TV program from the Middle East - it's a free world
