Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jayeff
It is up to the individual, but so much talk about pushing the envelope makes me wonder how many people have really thought about the implications of turning themselves into potential test cases.
As to your specific point, these rules are ostensibly about ensuring that minors are not used in the production of porn. So ask yourself, if the agents inspecting your site(s) see a headshot of a young-looking girl, are they going to skip past it, or are they more likely to require to see the whole picture, even the whole photoshoot? I haven't seen anything to suggest they cannot ask for the whole set and it would surely be logical to do so.
|
hmm, perhaps you're right jayeff, headshots or even non-nudes may be technically exempt but I suppose it is "pushing the envelope" a bit.
The prospect of writing 9000 variants of "hot broad posing seductively" for every gallery in the DB is a bit unpleasant though - as is deleting 100's of hours worth of cropped thumbs from sites that are doing very well in their current form
