Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AmateurFlix
1. I assume if I use only textlinks to sites or FHG's, that should place me well out of reach of the new regulations since this does not place any image or video content on my sites/servers. However there is a section in 4472 addressing text content as well. At first glance it appears to deal only with "misleading" text used to entice children, however I wonder how this would deal with a description such as "Hot blonde inserts toy" since the description contains the word "toy". Any comments?
|
Just because the law is in place with something like that, they would have to prove you had intent to mislead.
That's just my opinion, but I believe the intent behind that part of thew law is to stop people from starting some site that uses a name close to something kids would search for.
For example "policeman.net" IMO was a bad name to pick for a porn site. Of course they are not in the US but if they were I'm sure they would soon have issues with that site.
IMO it couldn't hurt to have an "adult" keyword in your domain. Personally I've always done that, I would say at least 80% of my domains have an adult keyword in them.
Add a warning page and I think it would be pretty reasonable that you didn't have intent to mislead anyone, especially if the domain has an adult keyword.