View Single Post
Old 07-25-2006, 03:16 PM  
Quentin
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,280
Read the analysis of Article V of HR 4472 - AKA the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 - posted on the FSC website. The analysis was prepared by attorney Reed Lee, and is summarized in bullet points for the reading-averse.

The analysis is posted here

An excerpt from Mr. Lee's analysis of the effects on section 2257 as amended under the language the 'Adam Walsh Act':

"Not only must an original producer gather, create, cross-index, and store all of these records, but all re-publishers must also obtain and store the records themselves. So the regulatory scheme not only requires substantially burdensome record-keeping requirements, it also mandates widespread record-shifting, as copies of the required records are made and transferred to each subsequent re-publisher. And since federal law does nothing to protect the privacy of this information as it shifts among re-publishers, current law exposes performers to the dangers of identity theft, stalking, and worse. Naturally enough, this has a chilling effect on the creation of constitutionally protected expression."

- Q.
__________________
Q. Boyer
Quentin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote