Crooked Fucking U.S. President

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • Paul Markham
    Too old to care
    • Jun 2001
    • 52942
    #51
    Caught me out to, but then does the fact that this was under Clinton and so far no one has been charged with anything re the illegal invasion of Iraq under Bush make you think who really runs the US?

    For instance how much was spent trying to find out if Clinton got a BJ and how much is being spent to find out if Bush killed thousands of people for no reason?
    Last edited by Paul Markham; 04-01-2005, 10:50 PM.



    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

      Comment

      • New User
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2005
        • 101
        #52
        Originally posted by charly
        Caught me out to, but then does the fact that this was under Clinton and so far no one has been charged with anything re the illegal invasion of Iraq under Bush make you think who really runs the US?

        For instance how much was spent trying to find out if Clinton got a BJ and how much is being spent to find out if Bush killed thousands of people for no reason?
        The incident they are referring to did not happen "under Clinton."

        It happened under Bush actually, just that the guilty party worked under Clinton years ago before the incident happened at all.

        But, ya your right on everything else.

          Comment

          • xclusive
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Apr 2004
            • 35218
            #53
            Being critical of the president is the most patriotic thing that there is if it is done for our boys and girls out fighting for us.

            I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /


              Comment

              • FunForOne
                Confirmed User
                • Nov 2003
                • 8704
                #54
                Originally posted by New User
                The incident they are referring to did not happen "under Clinton."

                It happened under Bush actually, just that the guilty party worked under Clinton years ago before the incident happened at all.

                That is the spinniest spin that has ever been spun.

                  Comment

                  • New User
                    Confirmed User
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 101
                    #55
                    Originally posted by FunForOne
                    That is the spinniest spin that has ever been spun.
                    Truth is now the spin? You people are all idiots!

                      Comment

                      • LadyMischief
                        Orgasms N Such!
                        • Sep 2002
                        • 18135
                        #56
                        Originally posted by FunForOne
                        On Friday, Sandy Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in federal court. Berger, who served as the President's national security adviser, is acknowledging that it wasn't an honest mistake and that he intentionally took and destroyed copies of classified documents from the National Archives and cut them up with scissors.

                        Berger acknowledged that he intentionally took and deliberately destroyed three copies of the same document dealing with terror threats. He then lied about it to Archives staff when they told him the documents were missing.

                        "Guilty, your honor," Berger responded when asked how he pleaded.

                        He said his motivation was to help himself and others prepare for their appearance before the commission probing the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.


                        But still missing are drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the administration's response to a failed terror plot

                        One source told News that the report was critical of how the administration handled Al Qaeda threats to the U.S. homeland and that the missing report made security recommendations that were never implemented.






                        Excuse the Michael moore type editing, but this has got to be the crookedest crooks to ever be in the white house.

                        Looks like Berger was jumping on the grenade so the President would be at fault for not doing anything about future terror attacks.
                        He may have been chosen in the CLinton administration, but WHICH administration ordered him to destroy the documents? I think that would more be the issue than who chose him. Who issued the orders?

                        ICQ 3522039
                        Content Manager - orgasm.com
                        [email protected]

                          Comment

                          • LadyMischief
                            Orgasms N Such!
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 18135
                            #57
                            Originally posted by FunForOne
                            That is the spinniest spin that has ever been spun.

                            You are an idiot if you think that's not relevent.

                            Person A gets a job working for a company run by Person B. Person A works well, so when Person B sells his company to Person C, Person C keeps him on. Person C then tells Person A to commit a felony, Person A obeys, so what is it that makes that the fault of Person B? Simple because he hired the person he's at fault? Who, under the law, would be guilty? I would think the ONE GIVING THE ORDERS? Duh.

                            ICQ 3522039
                            Content Manager - orgasm.com
                            [email protected]

                              Comment

                              • FunForOne
                                Confirmed User
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 8704
                                #58
                                Originally posted by LadyMischief
                                You are an idiot if you think that's not relevent.

                                Person A gets a job working for a company run by Person B. Person A works well, so when Person B sells his company to Person C, Person C keeps him on. Person C then tells Person A to commit a felony, Person A obeys, so what is it that makes that the fault of Person B? Simple because he hired the person he's at fault? Who, under the law, would be guilty? I would think the ONE GIVING THE ORDERS? Duh.

                                He doesn't and has never worked for the current administration. He was reviewing the documents because he was responding to the 9/11 commission on behalf of the Clinton administration.


                                He stole and destroyed documents that were reccomendations to clinton on how to prevent future terrorists attacks. The recomendations were never inacted, we were later attacked.

                                It would be important to know what those reccomendations were, but unless you are Sandy Berger's jockstrap, you will never see those classified documents again.

                                Thanks!

                                  Comment

                                  • FunForOne
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2003
                                    • 8704
                                    #59
                                    Originally posted by LadyMischief
                                    Who issued the orders?

                                    Pretty sure Hillary was in the room when they decided the documents couldn't be public.

                                      Comment

                                      • New User
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Feb 2005
                                        • 101
                                        #60
                                        Originally posted by FunForOne
                                        He doesn't and has never worked for the current administration. He was reviewing the documents because he was responding to the 9/11 commission on behalf of the Clinton administration.


                                        He stole and destroyed documents that were reccomendations to clinton on how to prevent future terrorists attacks. The recomendations were never inacted, we were later attacked.

                                        It would be important to know what those reccomendations were, but unless you are Sandy Berger's jockstrap, you will never see those classified documents again.

                                        Thanks!
                                        Since it has been well documented by the 911 Commission that the Clinton admin did in fact give very detailed instructions as to the measures they wanted instituted to prevent terrorist attacks on ur soil and Bush is the one who decided not to enact any of them, I wonder who Mr. Berger helped here.

                                        Sounds more like (by your logic) he helped the Bush admin by doing what he did, not the Clinton.


                                        And I am sure you know that Hillary was in the room when Berger took the documents you stupid retard.

                                        You idiots will make up anything that you think sounds good, to bad youll never win a debate byu using actual facts to state your case. Little right-wing Rush children

                                          Comment

                                          • BlueQuartz
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • May 2004
                                            • 1971
                                            #61
                                            Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                                            Why do you hate America? Being critical of a U.S. president is the same as supporting terrorism.

                                            You America haters make the world safe for terrorism.

                                            now this is fuckin scary


                                            this is going to be americas justification for attackin people for the foreseeable future - oh you didnt kiss our ass you must be a terrorist

                                            have you ever seen a more narrow minded, media brainwashed bunch of fools in your life!!!!!!!!!!

                                            george bush is a piece of shit and so are terrorists

                                            get your head around that one c*nt

                                              Comment

                                              • dready
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Oct 2002
                                                • 5247
                                                #62
                                                Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                                                Why do you hate America? Being critical of a U.S. president is the same as supporting terrorism.

                                                You America haters make the world safe for terrorism.
                                                Being critical is the cornerstone of democracy.
                                                ICQ: 91139591

                                                  Comment

                                                  • theking
                                                    Nice Kitty
                                                    • Sep 2002
                                                    • 21053
                                                    #63
                                                    Originally posted by charly
                                                    No you are the one who hates America and helping the terrorists.

                                                    If you have a loved one doing something wrong and getting hated for it, do you let them continue to do wrong without correcting them?

                                                    There has never been any proof that Iraq had anything ot do with 9/11, there is no proof that Iraq was a threat to anyone other than themselves, there is no proof that Iraq possesssed WMD at the time of the illegal invasion.

                                                    There is however proof that none of that Iraq and Al Queda were not linked, Bin Laden hates Saddam for the Mulsims he killed. There is proof that Iraqs army was totally useless and they can find 0 (zero, nada, nothing) about WMDs after scouring through the country for years.

                                                    This was the reason for the invasion, the fact that your leaders stood up and lied seems to mean nothing to you, if you say you know there is something and it turns out you had no proof, thats a lie. The truth should of been "WE THINK THEY HAVE WMDs, HOWEVER WE ARE UNABLE TO PROVIDE 1 SOLID PIECE OF EVIDENCE"

                                                    But you ignore all this and support Bush, while more and more terrorists are being recruited because of his actions.

                                                    A true lover of America would be standing up and protesting about it, a hater would be thinking, this Bush guy is a gift to us.
                                                    Pigshit. I listed the reasons for the war prior to the war and those reasons were applicable then and they are applicable now. The WMD's were never...I repeat never...the primary reason for the invasion of Iraq. WMD's/WMD materials were the primary reason (not the only reason) provided to the public to beat the drums of war...(because all US intel agencies...as well as British...Israeli...French...German...Russian...Eg yptian...Jordanian...Saudi...were all in concurrence with the US intel...and in fact provided intel to the US about WMD's) so the Admin had every reason to believe that WMD's/WMD material would be found. The director of the CIA told the Admin that it was a "slam dunk" regarding WMD's/WMD materail. This Admin and all Admins have to rely upon their intel agencies. The simple fact is the US should have taken down Saddam and the Baath party in '91-'92-'93-'94-'95-'96-'97-'98-'99-'00-'01-'02. The US displayed extraordinary patience.

                                                    9/11 presented the perfect opportunity to do something that should have been done from '91 on...and Iraq became an expansion of the declared Global War on "terrorism". It is a strategic piece of real estate...which places US assets in a position to deal with the enemies that exist in the Mid East...has strategic reserves...and offers the opportunity to change the face of the Mid East...which is in fact showing early results.

                                                    Buy yourself a clue...clueless.
                                                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                      Comment

                                                      • New User
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                        • 101
                                                        #64
                                                        Originally posted by theking
                                                        Pigshit. I listed the reasons for the war prior to the war and those reasons were applicable then and they are applicable now. The WMD's were never...I repeat never...the primary reason for the invasion of Iraq. WMD's/WMD materials were the primary reason (not the only reason) provided to the public to beat the drums of war...(because all US intel agencies...as well as British...Israeli...French...German...Russian...Eg yptian...Jordanian...Saudi...were all in concurrence with the US intel...and in fact provided intel to the US about WMD's) so the Admin had every reason to believe that WMD's/WMD material would be found. The director of the CIA told the Admin that it was a "slam dunk" regarding WMD's/WMD materail. This Admin and all Admins have to rely upon their intel agencies. The simple fact is the US should have taken down Saddam and the Baath party in '91-'92-'93-'94-'95-'96-'97-'98-'99-'00-'01-'02. The US displayed extraordinary patience.

                                                        9/11 presented the perfect opportunity to do something that should have been done from '91 on...and Iraq became an expansion of the declared Global War on "terrorism". It is a strategic piece of real estate...which places US assets in a position to deal with the enemies that exist in the Mid East...has strategic reserves...and offers the opportunity to change the face of the Mid East...which is in fact showing early results.

                                                        Buy yourself a clue...clueless.

                                                        Child, if I were you I'd get up on current events, more than half your post has been recently discredited.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • theking
                                                            Nice Kitty
                                                            • Sep 2002
                                                            • 21053
                                                            #65
                                                            Originally posted by New User
                                                            Child, if I were you I'd get up on current events, more than half your post has been recently discredited.
                                                            You are wrong...if not educate me. BTW...FYI...I am in my late forties.
                                                            Last edited by theking; 04-02-2005, 12:31 PM.
                                                            When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                            FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                              Comment

                                                              • New User
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Feb 2005
                                                                • 101
                                                                #66
                                                                Originally posted by theking
                                                                You are wrong...if not educate me. BTW...FYI...I am in my late forties.
                                                                WOW! Your late forties and you can't do your own fact checking?

                                                                I'll make it really easy for you, start with LexisNexis, it will save you days.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • theking
                                                                    Nice Kitty
                                                                    • Sep 2002
                                                                    • 21053
                                                                    #67
                                                                    Originally posted by New User
                                                                    WOW! Your late forties and you can't do your own fact checking?

                                                                    I'll make it really easy for you, start with LexisNexis, it will save you days.
                                                                    My "facts" have been checked...thank you very much...that is why I said that you are wrong.
                                                                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Dildozer
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Jul 2002
                                                                        • 7519
                                                                        #68
                                                                        God all you people who think MrFiction's statement is true are fucking IDIOTS

                                                                        Sheesh seriously kill yourselves
                                                                        Spam link here

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • New User
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Feb 2005
                                                                            • 101
                                                                            #69
                                                                            Originally posted by theking
                                                                            My "facts" have been checked...thank you very much...that is why I said that you are wrong.

                                                                            Now you just sound like an idiot, but if you choose to remain so ignorant thats your choice.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • New User
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Feb 2005
                                                                                • 101
                                                                                #70
                                                                                Originally posted by Dildozer
                                                                                God all you people who think MrFiction's statement is true are fucking IDIOTS

                                                                                Sheesh seriously kill yourselves
                                                                                Nevermind, I get it now. wrong Nick and wrong post
                                                                                Last edited by New User; 04-02-2005, 12:51 PM.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • theking
                                                                                    Nice Kitty
                                                                                    • Sep 2002
                                                                                    • 21053
                                                                                    #71
                                                                                    Originally posted by New User
                                                                                    Now you just sound like an idiot, but if you choose to remain so ignorant thats your choice.
                                                                                    I am far from being ignorant...and nothing in my post was incorrect...including my opinions. You are now dismissed.
                                                                                    When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

                                                                                    FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • New User
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                                                        • 101
                                                                                        #72
                                                                                        Originally posted by theking
                                                                                        I am far from being ignorant...and nothing in my post was incorrect...including my opinions. You are now dismissed.

                                                                                        Right, keep telling yourself that, just makes you look dumber.

                                                                                        You were dismissed the second you started typing, sorry to break it to you Barbra Bush.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • DJChunkyB
                                                                                            Registered User
                                                                                            • Feb 2005
                                                                                            • 32
                                                                                            #73
                                                                                            Hey MORONS!!!

                                                                                            Originally posted by FunForOne
                                                                                            On Friday, Sandy Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in federal court. Berger, who served as the President's national security adviser, is acknowledging that it wasn't an honest mistake and that he intentionally took and destroyed copies of classified documents from the National Archives and cut them up with scissors.

                                                                                            Berger acknowledged that he intentionally took and deliberately destroyed three copies of the same document dealing with terror threats. He then lied about it to Archives staff when they told him the documents were missing.

                                                                                            "Guilty, your honor," Berger responded when asked how he pleaded.

                                                                                            He said his motivation was to help himself and others prepare for their appearance before the commission probing the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.


                                                                                            But still missing are drafts of a sensitive after-action report on the administration's response to a failed terror plot

                                                                                            One source told News that the report was critical of how the administration handled Al Qaeda threats to the U.S. homeland and that the missing report made security recommendations that were never implemented.






                                                                                            Excuse the Michael moore type editing, but this has got to be the crookedest crooks to ever be in the white house.

                                                                                            Looks like Berger was jumping on the grenade so the President would be at fault for not doing anything about future terror attacks.

                                                                                            For those of you who are obviously not very well educated on the current events of the United States Government and also for those of you who seem to get your best jerk off material from posting misinformation about our current Presidential administration on this board, like it even matters. SANDY (Fucktard) BERGER WAS FORMER PRESIDENT WILLIAM (Slick Willy) JEFFERSON CLINTON'S NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR. HE HAD ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION. The incident in question was as FunForOne stated but Sandy Berger was doing this to protect his own ass and the even larger asses of Bill Clinton and his wifey turned Senator Hillary. He got off with a lousy misdemeanor conviction for pleading guilty to what amounts to HIGH TREASON but because he said, "yes I did it and I am sorry." the ultra left wing liberal federal judge gave him the deal of the century. HE got a better deal than Sammy "The Bull" Gravanno got for flipping on John Gotti and didn't have to point a finger at anyone for anything. If this had actually been a member of the Bush administration I am sure we would still be hearing about it on the TV news and reading about it in the trustworthy liberal biased newspapers. Heck, they would probably have the story on the front page for a week while Sandy Berger's story was buried in the middle of the damn paper right along with the ads for Lilly's ($5.00 love you long time) Day Spa.

                                                                                            IF YOU PEOPLE WANT TO BE POLITICAL COMENTATORS PLEASE TRY TO BE A TAD MORE ACCURATE THAN MICHAEL (I'M A FAT SLOB WHORE FOR MY DEMOCRAT PIMPS) MOORE AND DAN (WILL MAKE UP NEWS FOR FOOD) RATHER. GET THE STORIES RIGHT OR START TELLING NURSERY RHYMES INSTEAD THEY ARE MORE BELIEVABLE.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • jonpotz
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Aug 2004
                                                                                                • 960
                                                                                                #74
                                                                                                Originally posted by DJChunkyB
                                                                                                DAN (WILL MAKE UP NEWS FOR FOOD) RATHER.
                                                                                                LOL!

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • DJChunkyB
                                                                                                    Registered User
                                                                                                    • Feb 2005
                                                                                                    • 32
                                                                                                    #75
                                                                                                    Originally posted by FunForOne
                                                                                                    I think this proves that leading with your finger in the air is not the correct way to be president of the United States.

                                                                                                    FunForOne I think all this proves is that posting with your finger in your ass is the correct way to prove you are an idiot. If I was not taking your remarks out of context you have been in this board in the past defending Bush and bashing the idiots like "Rich" who come on here and make inflamitory remarks about all sorts of liberal agenda topics. Now you are flipping on taking the other side. Who's side are you on??? If you are just trying to get noticed well congratulations you got noticed, but does it do any good to be noticed when you are the kid in school who always smells like he shit himself? PeeeUuueww

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      • DJChunkyB
                                                                                                        Registered User
                                                                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                                                                        • 32
                                                                                                        #76
                                                                                                        LadyMistaken!

                                                                                                        Originally posted by LadyMischief
                                                                                                        You are an idiot if you think that's not relevent.

                                                                                                        Person A gets a job working for a company run by Person B. Person A works well, so when Person B sells his company to Person C, Person C keeps him on. Person C then tells Person A to commit a felony, Person A obeys, so what is it that makes that the fault of Person B? Simple because he hired the person he's at fault? Who, under the law, would be guilty? I would think the ONE GIVING THE ORDERS? Duh.
                                                                                                        I hate to say it but you are the idiot for even attempting to make this post. Person A (Sandy Berger) was not kept on by Person C (Bush) he may not have even been the National Security Advisor for Person B (Clinton) at the end of his term as President. If my memory serves me right he resigned not long after Clinton (Person B) botched the opportunity to apprehend, capture, or KILL Bin Laden back in 92. Person A was never working under the orders of Person C. Person A was working under his own direction of "Save My Ass" and possibly looking out for his former boss Person B in the process. Either way it was the current administration (Person C) and the FBI who were conducting the investigation of Person B (Sandy Berger) because as someone already stated on here he was caught on tape stuffing the documents he had not yet destroyed in his brief case, his pants, his underwear, and was even dumb enough to try and carry some of the papers to a nearby trash can. He is guilty! He took the bullet for being a complete dumb ass not for taking orders from Person B or Person C.

                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                          • DJChunkyB
                                                                                                            Registered User
                                                                                                            • Feb 2005
                                                                                                            • 32
                                                                                                            #77
                                                                                                            Ooops Forgot to SpellCheck that!

                                                                                                            Originally posted by DJChunkyB
                                                                                                            FunForOne I think all this proves is that posting with your finger in your ass is the correct way to prove you are an idiot. If I was not taking your remarks out of context you have been in this board in the past defending Bush and bashing the idiots like "Rich" who come on here and make inflamitory remarks about all sorts of liberal agenda topics. Now you are flipping on taking the other side. Who's side are you on??? If you are just trying to get noticed well congratulations you got noticed, but does it do any good to be noticed when you are the kid in school who always smells like he shit himself? PeeeUuueww

                                                                                                            inflamitory = Wrong! I-N-F-L-A-M-M-A-T-O-R-Y

                                                                                                            Who's = What was I thinking? W-H-O-S-E

                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                              • FunForOne
                                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                                • Nov 2003
                                                                                                                • 8704
                                                                                                                #78
                                                                                                                Originally posted by DJChunkyB
                                                                                                                FunForOne I think all this proves is that posting with your finger in your ass is the correct way to prove you are an idiot. If I was not taking your remarks out of context you have been in this board in the past defending Bush and bashing the idiots like "Rich" who come on here and make inflamitory remarks about all sorts of liberal agenda topics. Now you are flipping on taking the other side. Who's side are you on??? If you are just trying to get noticed well congratulations you got noticed, but does it do any good to be noticed when you are the kid in school who always smells like he shit himself? PeeeUuueww

                                                                                                                I'm guessing you didn't get a chance to read the entire thread. I'll give you an oportunity to correct to double back if you need to.

                                                                                                                Slick Willie kept an approval rating by doing just that, - Keeping his approval rating.

                                                                                                                By that I mean that he did not make unpopular decisions no matter what the cost. He chose inaction many times instead of a course of action which may have hurt the public opinion of himself.

                                                                                                                For example, he would not act or even associate with anything having to do with the military because he was scared his draft dodging would make the front page.

                                                                                                                He would take polls, he would stick his finger in the air and see which way the wind was blowing before he did anything.

                                                                                                                I think 20 years from now this country will still be discovering some of the crooked stuff he did. I am a very good judge of people, I know people like Clinton, they are called con men.

                                                                                                                Sandy Berger was around the whitehouse when the trade towers were attacked, just not the 9/11 attacks. Military action would have been proper responses to several of the attacks on the U.S. in the 90's. Clinton just realized it might have made him unpopular. The result: More attacks on the U.S.


                                                                                                                We will never learn what reccomendations Clinton did not inact to prevent future terrorists attacks, Mr Berger made sure of that.

                                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                                  • New User
                                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                                    • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                    • 101
                                                                                                                    #79
                                                                                                                    Originally posted by FunForOne
                                                                                                                    We will never learn what reccomendations Clinton did not inact to prevent future terrorists attacks, Mr Berger made sure of that.

                                                                                                                    Hey LIAR! Something called the 911 Commission Report, try reading it, if any of you dittoheads can actually read.

                                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                                      • DJChunkyB
                                                                                                                        Registered User
                                                                                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                        • 32
                                                                                                                        #80
                                                                                                                        I do stand corrected but ...

                                                                                                                        Originally posted by FunForOne
                                                                                                                        I'm guessing you didn't get a chance to read the entire thread. I'll give you an oportunity to correct to double back if you need to.

                                                                                                                        I do stand corrected but you sure as hell did stir up a shit storm with this whole post.

                                                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                                                          • DJChunkyB
                                                                                                                            Registered User
                                                                                                                            • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                            • 32
                                                                                                                            #81
                                                                                                                            Originally posted by New User
                                                                                                                            Hey LIAR! Something called the 911 Commission Report, try reading it, if any of you dittoheads can actually read.

                                                                                                                            Dude do you really want to go down the road of what the 9/11 report found on the Clinton (lack of) Administration efforts to prevent the inevitable. The 9/11 report very clearly points out that the severe lack of appropriate response to earlier attacks on US interests both at home and abroad led to invite further attacks. It was also under the Clinton Administration that the CIA, NSA, and various military intelegence agencies were all scaled down and ordered to put a halt to the use of counter intelegence agents and other human "assets" as a means of combating threats of terrorism. They chose to rely on the "new technology" rather than have human lives at risk. While there were faults found on both Republican and Democratic leadership roles in the prevention of such an attack loosing the ability to infiltrate and learn from the terror networks was noted as a key base line source to the problem. Don't chalenge someone on their reading skills when you choose to read the Michael Moore "Cliff Notes" version of the 9/11 report.

                                                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                                                              Previous 1 2 template Next
                                                                                                                              Working...