New Utah anti-porn law - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

posh rat in hell

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 403
Share

Post
#1

New Utah anti-porn law

03-04-2005, 06:32 AM

http://news.com.com/Utah+governor+we...l?tag=nefd.top

Quite amazing that shit like this can be so close to approved (and this one seems like it will be approved).
Tags: None
Cassie

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 3139
Share

Post
#2

03-04-2005, 06:56 AM

isn't there a chance that this could be knocked down by the supreme court eventually for violation of freedom of speech?

ICQ: 309756847
]
Comment
thaifan99

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 3029
Share

Post
#3

03-04-2005, 06:58 AM

dang mormons influence?

ARE YOU A FAMILY MEMBER? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT!
Comment
ADL Colin

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 11929
Share

Post
#4

03-04-2005, 06:59 AM

Originally posted by thaifan99

dang mormons influence?

Oh, yeah

Adult Date Link - $50 PPS starting NOW! -- good and JUICY!

skype = "adultdatelink"
Comment
Tony Montana

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 794
Share

Post
#5

03-04-2005, 07:00 AM

"Utah must offer their customers a way to disable access to sites on the list or face felony charges"

It looks like more like parental controls for the internet. Whats wrong with that? You like 14 y/o boys seeing your porn site?

I say its a good thing, it would improve the quality of traffic. As well as help us not be required to add some real method of age verification(because it would be done by the parents). IMO

I am a marketing Genius.
Comment
MacDaddyPlaya

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 1785
Share

Post
#6

03-04-2005, 07:00 AM

Fuckin Mormons. It's okay to marry a shit load of women, but don't look at porn.

Sigless
Comment
Manowar

jellyfish

Join Date: Dec 2003

Posts: 71528
Share

Post
#7

03-04-2005, 07:00 AM

Yay for censorship.
Comment
NastyTaylor

Registered User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 96
Share

Post
#8

03-04-2005, 07:01 AM

that does not sounds good!!

[email protected]

"Your Premier Adult Entertainment Network"
Comment
Tony Montana

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 794
Share

Post
#9

03-04-2005, 07:03 AM

"Upon request by a consumer, a service provider may not transmit material from a content provider site listed on the adult content registry."

Its only upon request too..

I am a marketing Genius.
Comment
MacDaddyPlaya

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 1785
Share

Post
#10

03-04-2005, 07:05 AM

Originally posted by Tony Montana

"Utah must offer their customers a way to disable access to sites on the list or face felony charges"

It looks like more like parental controls for the internet. Whats wrong with that? You like 14 y/o boys seeing your porn site?

I say its a good thing, it would improve the quality of traffic. As well as help us not be required to add some real method of age verification(because it would be done by the parents). IMO

The law seeks to.....
create an official list of Web sites with publicly available material found to be "harmful to minors."
Who gets to decide what is harmful to minors? How far can this possibly extend? How much money will be wasted creating and maintaing this list? This is a bad idea imo.

Sigless
Comment
CHMOD

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 1697
Share

Post
#11

03-04-2005, 07:18 AM

Originally posted by Tony Montana

It looks like more like parental controls for the internet. Whats wrong with that? You like 14 y/o boys seeing your porn site?

You are 100% right !

I prefer seing him watching Braveheart or Gladiator.
Violence is much less damaging than sex !

Sell our Silicone Dolls and make big money!

Our website:
https://www.sexdolls-shop.com/

Signup:
http://www.sexdollscash.com/sliiing/registration.php

Contact:
[email protected]
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#12

03-04-2005, 07:30 AM

Originally posted by Tony Montana

"Utah must offer their customers a way to disable access to sites on the list or face felony charges"

It looks like more like parental controls for the internet. Whats wrong with that? You like 14 y/o boys seeing your porn site?

I say its a good thing, it would improve the quality of traffic. As well as help us not be required to add some real method of age verification(because it would be done by the parents). IMO

How is it going to be good for traffic when I bet you anything the ISP's will end up putting the adult filter on by defualt. So they don't have to risk getting fined.

This is just the first step in that direction..

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
junction

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 2411
Share

Post
#13

03-04-2005, 07:32 AM

Originally posted by Tony Montana

"Utah must offer their customers a way to disable access to sites on the list or face felony charges"

It looks like more like parental controls for the internet. Whats wrong with that? You like 14 y/o boys seeing your porn site?

I say its a good thing, it would improve the quality of traffic. As well as help us not be required to add some real method of age verification(because it would be done by the parents). IMO

Parental controls already exist. Maybe the parents should be doing their jobs.

Is government control and censorship the answer?

God bless this once great country
Comment
RawAlex

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 9465
Share

Post
#14

03-04-2005, 07:42 AM

Welcome to "tail attempting to wag dog" for this week...

The State of Utah cannot write laws and attempt to claim some sort of jurisdiction over sites and services that are NOT in their state. My servers, business, and such are NOT in Utah, and I don't send anything to Utah (however, their citizens may cause data to be transmitted to their state, which is beyond my control, and the at of transportation is caused by and at the direction of individual surfer, I don't push anything, the surfer pulls).

Utah can kiss my white ass.

Alex
Comment
Bansheelinks

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 6023
Share

Post
#15

03-04-2005, 07:45 AM

that will won't last at all...........just a waste of taxpayer's money and some idiot politician pandering to his religious base again
Comment
RawAlex

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 9465
Share

Post
#16

03-04-2005, 07:49 AM

Junction, I am all for "parental controls", but I can tell you that there is no single service that could block all the sites on the list, nor would that list ever be complete and total. Potentially ISPs will stop offering service in Utah to avoid the potential for fines and such because it would be impossible to keep everyone with an up to date list on each PC. It's easier to turn off the internet completely, which in effect limits free speech for everyone.

Why can't someone just wake up and pass the "Internet is an adult thing" law, and make parents responsible for their children while they are online? It seems to me that forcing ISPs to do the parent's job is a poor way to get the desired results.

Utah = religious nutjobs grouped together such that they have ended up with power. We need to have about a half a million new Yorkers to move into Salt Lake City and really screw the place up right.

Alex
Comment
Xenophage

Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 12122
Share

Post
#17

03-04-2005, 07:54 AM

Also targeted are content providers, defined as any company that "creates, collects, acquires or organizes electronic data" for profit. Any content provider that hosts material deemed harmful to minors by the Utah attorney general must rate it or face third-degree felony charges.

A letter that NetCoalition sent to the state Senate earlier this week said the wording is so vague it could affect search engines, e-mail providers and Web hosting companies. "A search engine that links to a Web site in Utah might be required...to 'properly rate' the Web site," the letter said

Hhahahah GOOGLE and YAHOO would ahv to comply tehy have nude images in their image search and they "creates, collects, acquires or organizes electronic data" for profit

this wont fly !
Comment
stev0

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 6801
Share

Post
#18

03-04-2005, 08:14 AM

Mormons are fucked in the head
Comment
xxxmaster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 1155
Share

Post
#19

03-04-2005, 08:54 AM

can they come back on site owners?? with legal charges for providing thier site in utah?
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...