
People like this need to fucking die
Collapse
X
-
My god, what kind of a fucking parent is that? Sheesh.
the kid looks like he just saw something disturbing yet intruiging at the same time. -
That kid looks like a little girl. Poor child.
Aftaer a good second look, the guy next to the little girl and her dad is a kid too!! Jesus.
Last edited by Tala; 03-03-2005, 04:46 PM.Comment
-
poor girl....she's looking at a white girl in a bikini.....OH THE HORROR!
Kill the father now! The child is scarred for LIFE!
idiots.Comment
-
Comment
-
Okay, but it looks like she's covered with a bathing suit. Yeah she's bent over, but how much different is that than people sun bathing on a beach? Not too much.Originally posted by vikiThere's a reason everyone is taking pictures. It's not just an everyday beach scene.
Somewhere there's probably some ultra conservatives that think people who sell porn on the Internet deserve to die. Kind of an extremist view point, don't you think?.Comment
-
A Nascar dad?Originally posted by iwantchixxMy god, what kind of a fucking parent is that? Sheesh.Comment
-
Originally posted by WarChildOh no! Not something the child could see on any beach in the World. Can you imagine the horror?!?
i gotta agree with ya there...
nothing wrong there...just hit ANY florida beach at spring break and you will see hundreds of children, teenagers and older folk watching wet tshirt contests, bikini contests...etcComment
-
I see your point about how she's just in a bathing suit. However, as I said, there is definitely a reason that nearly everyone is taking photos. We also can't see what kind of bathing suit she's wearing... it could be pulled to the side. Who knows what's going on back there?Originally posted by WarChildOkay, but it looks like she's covered with a bathing suit. Yeah she's bent over, but how much different is that than people sun bathing on a beach? Not too much.
Somewhere there's probably some ultra conservatives that think people who sell porn on the Internet deserve to die. Kind of an extremist view point, don't you think?
As far as your extremist point of view comment, think about this for a second: you may completely approve of internet pornography, but would you want your 8 or 9 year old child to be exposed to it? Furthermore, would you want to personally expose your kid to that? If the child had just walked by and noticed the scene, fine... but that's not the case. Her father brought her there on purpose. That's the sickening part to me.Comment
-
Exactly, you don't know. She's wearing some sort of bathing suit bottom, it appears to be in public. You're willing to assume right off the bat the bathing suit is pulled to the side though.Originally posted by vikiI see your point about how she's just in a bathing suit. However, as I said, there is definitely a reason that nearly everyone is taking photos. We also can't see what kind of bathing suit she's wearing... it could be pulled to the side. Who knows what's going on back there?
My point is that it's not your child, you don't know what's going on other than one snap shot in time. We're all involved in a business that at least some portion of the population finds morally objectionable. It's okay for you to say what's moral and not, and even for the poster to decide this guy needs to die, but I bet you'd take offense to others thinking the same about you.As far as your extremist point of view comment, think about this for a second: you may completely approve of internet pornography, but would you want your 8 or 9 year old child to be exposed to it?
So your assertation is the father packed up his child, went out to the beach (or wherever that is) and took his child specifically to watch a girl bent over in a bikini (which is probably pulled to the side). You have no idea if that's the case. Could he have been walking by and decided to stop and take a picture? Is that so bad? Walk down the beach, there's tons of women laying face down with tiny bathing suits on. Is it morally objectionable to take your child to the beach because they might see sun bathers?Furthermore, would you want to personally expose your kid to that? If the child had just walked by and noticed the scene, fine... but that's not the case. Her father brought her there on purpose. That's the sickening part to me..Comment
-
From the responses in this thread it looks like YOU, the thread starter are the dumbass.Originally posted by Mystyou are a dumbass
Comment
-
With FOOLS like iwantchixxx in this thread, you know it's full of shit.Originally posted by iwantchixxMy god, what kind of a fucking parent is that? Sheesh.
the kid looks like he just saw something disturbing yet intruiging at the same time.Comment
-
The kid looks kinda bored to me, like she can't figure out what the fuss is about. Not the smartest dad in the world. But the kid's probably saying, "So? What are we looking at?"email: [email protected]Comment
-
And he is taking pictures !Originally posted by TalaThat kid looks like a little girl. Poor child.
Aftaer a good second look, the guy next to the little girl and her dad is a kid too!! Jesus.
UUGallery Builder - automated photo/video gallery plugin for Wordpress!
Stop looking!
Checkout Naked Hosting, online since 1999 ! 

Comment
-
I really didnt want to laugh about this, but i couldnt stop myselfOriginally posted by NoCarrierWhat's wrong with that!? The kid is watching her mom dance.Comment
-
I didn't mean to say that the bathing suit is definitely pulled to the side, etc... all I meant was that you don't know how explicit the scene is. I never personally said that a person like that needed to die, I just found it gross for a father to hold his child as he was overtly oggling another woman. Of course it's not objectionable for a person to take a child to the beach, however I do believe it is wrong to give a child a front row view of something which received that kind of reaction from men. All I know is that if my father took me to something like that, I would be grossed out... plain and simple. At the age of 8-10, I was all ready well on my way to discovering my body and sexuality.Originally posted by WarChildExactly, you don't know. She's wearing some sort of bathing suit bottom, it appears to be in public. You're willing to assume right off the bat the bathing suit is pulled to the side though.
My point is that it's not your child, you don't know what's going on other than one snap shot in time. We're all involved in a business that at least some portion of the population finds morally objectionable. It's okay for you to say what's moral and not, and even for the poster to decide this guy needs to die, but I bet you'd take offense to others thinking the same about you.
So your assertation is the father packed up his child, went out to the beach (or wherever that is) and took his child specifically to watch a girl bent over in a bikini (which is probably pulled to the side). You have no idea if that's the case. Could he have been walking by and decided to stop and take a picture? Is that so bad? Walk down the beach, there's tons of women laying face down with tiny bathing suits on. Is it morally objectionable to take your child to the beach because they might see sun bathers?
Anyhow, it seems like the vote is split between men and women on this topic. Little boys may appreciate being taken to an event like that more than little girls - a double standard, I'm sure. At this point, I am ready to agree to disagree.Comment
-
Originally posted by BVFpoor girl....she's looking at a white girl in a bikini.....OH THE HORROR!
Kill the father now! The child is scarred for LIFE!
idiots.
It's the fact the old man is holding her up to her ass practically
Comment
-
I don't entirely disagree with you. It's in poor taste, it's not something I would do. I just don't think it's the end of the world. It's not the show stopper the title of the thread implies it is. That's all.Originally posted by vikiAnyhow, it seems like the vote is split between men and women on this topic. Little boys may appreciate being taken to an event like that more than little girls - a double standard, I'm sure. At this point, I am ready to agree to disagree..Comment
-
Now that statement I can agree with.Originally posted by WarChildI don't entirely disagree with you. It's in poor taste, it's not something I would do. I just don't think it's the end of the world. It's not the show stopper the title of the thread implies it is. That's all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BVFpoor girl....she's looking at a white girl in a bikini.....OH THE HORROR!
Kill the father now! The child is scarred for LIFE!
idiots.
lol, funny shitTrump haters gonna hate. that's all they can doComment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by WarChildExactly, you don't know. She's wearing some sort of bathing suit bottom, it appears to be in public. You're willing to assume right off the bat the bathing suit is pulled to the side though.
My point is that it's not your child, you don't know what's going on other than one snap shot in time. We're all involved in a business that at least some portion of the population finds morally objectionable. It's okay for you to say what's moral and not, and even for the poster to decide this guy needs to die, but I bet you'd take offense to others thinking the same about you.
So your assertation is the father packed up his child, went out to the beach (or wherever that is) and took his child specifically to watch a girl bent over in a bikini (which is probably pulled to the side). You have no idea if that's the case. Could he have been walking by and decided to stop and take a picture? Is that so bad? Walk down the beach, there's tons of women laying face down with tiny bathing suits on. Is it morally objectionable to take your child to the beach because they might see sun bathers?
You sure have a lot to say...Comment






Comment