NATO will be moving troops into - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#1

NATO will be moving troops into

05-29-2006, 04:35 AM

...Afghanistan...in force...beginning in July and is expected to be the singular military force in country by the end of the year.

They are expected to deploy throughout the entire country in an effort to subdue all of the opposition forces (alQuiada...Taliban...drug lords, organized criminal elements) in those parts of the country where there is not a current military presence.

This is according to the current CG of Nato forces and was stated in a speech I watched this morning...on C-Span.

I suspect that at some point NATO forces will move into Iraq...but the CG did not state this to be a fact.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Tags: None
Joe Citizen

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 4552
Share

Post
#2

05-29-2006, 05:24 AM

Well look who's back? Sgt. Speedbump.

How are the double bloody mary's this morning?
Comment
Altwebdesign
Share

Post
#3

05-29-2006, 05:59 AM

oh well, not sure what itll achieve time will tell
Comment
Altwebdesign
Share

Post
#4

05-29-2006, 05:59 AM

oh well, not sure what itll achieve time will tell
Comment
KRL

Entrepreneur

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 31429
Share

Post
#5

05-29-2006, 06:09 AM

About time, if some more troops don't arrive soon, Afghan will be controlled by the Taliban again.

If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains
Comment
E$_manager

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 13557
Share

Post
#6

05-29-2006, 06:09 AM

it all lookes like invasion.

Enjoy more sales with EnjoyBucks!
Homemade: Asian : Ebony : GFs : Voyeur : Nudist : Public : 3D
Comment
E$_manager

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 13557
Share

Post
#7

05-29-2006, 06:10 AM

tell me if i am wrong.

Enjoy more sales with EnjoyBucks!
Homemade: Asian : Ebony : GFs : Voyeur : Nudist : Public : 3D
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#8

05-29-2006, 06:53 AM

Originally posted by KRL

About time, if some more troops don't arrive soon, Afghan will be controlled by the Taliban again.

According to the CG there is not a significant re-emergence of the Taliban. He stated that the violent acts being committed in Afghanistan are remnants of the alQuiada, Taliban, drug lords, tribal leaders, and organized criminal elements. The above listed have little to do with one another and operate independant of one another having their own agenda.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
FetishDollars

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 187
Share

Post
#9

05-29-2006, 07:05 AM

Invasion is the right word.

http://www.strippokerclub.com/ Lets play poker
Comment
mOrrI

It's over there...

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 4208
Share

Post
#10

05-29-2006, 07:09 AM

Now it's NATO....
anyone else... ?

Get Your Binance Account
Comment
kanalj

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2006

Posts: 639
Share

Post
#11

05-29-2006, 07:17 AM

The U.S moved to few troops there in the first place, just enough to build and protect their natural gas pipe. surprise.

I made that back in the days!
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30147
Share

Post
#12

05-29-2006, 07:22 AM

Originally posted by theking

According to the CG there is not a significant re-emergence of the Taliban.

Happy to hear that

In recent weeks, southern Afghanistan has been hit by some of the deadliest fighting since the ouster of the Taliban regime in late 2001. Militants have stepped up attacks in their former heartland, drawing a fierce response from coalition and Afghan forces.

http://www.forbes.com/technology/fee...ap2778938.html

BTW, got out of jail ?

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#13

05-29-2006, 07:26 AM

Originally posted by directfiesta

Happy to hear that

BTW, got out of jail ?

He stated that the violent acts being committed in Afghanistan are remnants of the alQuiada, Taliban, drug lords, tribal leaders, and organized criminal elements. The above listed have little to do with one another and operate independant of one another having their own agenda.

I have never been in jail in my life...ass wipe. I quit posting on this board and am here today to remind Americans that it is memorial day...thank you very much.

Last edited by theking; 05-29-2006, 07:27 AM.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#14

05-29-2006, 07:32 AM

Just for clarification...I do not post on any other board either.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
mardigras

Bon temps!

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 14194
Share

Post
#15

05-29-2006, 07:51 AM

Originally posted by theking

...Afghanistan...in force...beginning in July and is expected to be the singular military force in country by the end of the year.

They are expected to deploy throughout the entire country in an effort to subdue all of the opposition forces (alQuiada...Taliban...drug lords, organized criminal elements) in those parts of the country where there is not a current military presence.

This is according to the current CG of Nato forces and was stated in a speech I watched this morning...on C-Span.

I suspect that at some point NATO forces will move into Iraq...but the CG did not state this to be a fact.

In other words, Bush failed (other than stirring things up) and NATO has to go in and clean up his mess.

Last edited by mardigras; 05-29-2006, 07:53 AM.

.
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#16

05-29-2006, 08:20 AM

Originally posted by mardigras

In other words, Bush failed (other than stirring things up) and NATO has to go in and clean up his mess.

A Marine General is the allied Commander of NATO and US forces are the largest member forces of NATO. Bringing in NATO forces means bringing in more allied/coalition forces and a larger force than what is currently in Afghanistan.

But yes...you can say that the US Commander in Chief did not put enough forces in Afghanistan...just as you can say the same about Iraq.

Last edited by theking; 05-29-2006, 08:22 AM.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30147
Share

Post
#17

05-29-2006, 08:22 AM

Originally posted by theking

and am here today to remind Americans that it is memorial day...thank you very much.

1 - remind on MEMORIAL day ... oxymoron ...
2 - Good thing it is only one day ... you promise to leave till next year ....
3 -

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
mardigras

Bon temps!

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 14194
Share

Post
#18

05-29-2006, 09:03 AM

Originally posted by theking

But yes...you can say that the US Commander in Chief did not put enough forces in Afghanistan...just as you can say the same about Iraq.

Regardless of any other differences you and I may have over the war/ this administration, this is one comment I agree whole-heartedly with

.
Comment
baddog

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 107089
Share

Post
#19

05-29-2006, 09:06 AM

Originally posted by mardigras

In other words, Bush failed (other than stirring things up) and NATO has to go in and clean up his mess.

Oh please. What mess has NATO ever successfully cleaned up?
Comment
Manga1

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 952
Share

Post
#20

05-29-2006, 09:44 AM

Ok, who can tell me why NATO was originally created and how moving into Afghanistan serves this purpose?
Comment
marketsmart

HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER

Join Date: Dec 2004

Posts: 20419
Share

Post
#21

05-29-2006, 09:48 AM

congrats to all the winners...
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#22

05-29-2006, 10:28 AM

Originally posted by Manga1

Ok, who can tell me why NATO was originally created and how moving into Afghanistan serves this purpose?

Changing times changes purpose/mission. I do not know of anything that is static.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
hova

Traffillionaire

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 22430
Share

Post
#23

05-29-2006, 02:15 PM

we'll see what happens

http://traffillions.com/

Sign up and get lifetime revshare on your traffic
Comment
sweetgirl2006

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2006

Posts: 1194
Share

Post
#24

05-29-2006, 02:48 PM

oh well will wait and see whats happens
Comment
Manga1

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 952
Share

Post
#25

05-29-2006, 08:19 PM

Originally posted by theking

Changing times changes purpose/mission. I do not know of anything that is static.

Wrong answer. NATO was created to defend against and contain the Soviet Union (Russia). NATO troops in Afghanistan do just that. Afghanistan used to be part of the Russian sphere of influence. NATO troops in Afghanistan serve to contain Russia so that if Russia makes a comeback it will not be able to become as powerfull as it was before. NATO hasn't changed it's mission. It is just busy finishing the job.
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30147
Share

Post
#26

05-29-2006, 08:39 PM

Originally posted by Manga1

Wrong answer. NATO was created to defend against and contain the Soviet Union (Russia). NATO troops in Afghanistan do just that. Afghanistan used to be part of the Russian sphere of influence. NATO troops in Afghanistan serve to contain Russia so that if Russia makes a comeback it will not be able to become as powerfull as it was before. NATO hasn't changed it's mission. It is just busy finishing the job.

Russia is laughing their head off while watching the occident stuck with the problem ...

Why do you think that the USSR went in Afghanistan in the first place ? Oil ? Land ? Wealth ?

No, just to contain the support that afghanistan was giving to the Tchechen ( their own islamic " terrorists " ).
The Americans, with their simplistic foreign policy ( communists ... argh ) armed, financed, supplied technicals to those religious rebels , under the command of a well know guy now ...

So you think that Russia will come back ...

NATO is not finishing any jobs, it just became the hoe ....

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...