OJ. Was he guilty or innocent?
-
skype = "adultdatelink" -
Ask Nicole. WE SHALL NEVER KNOW? -
Is there any doubt it was him?
hosted flv's, hosted galleries, morphing rss feeds, free content, free sites, hosted blogComment
-
-
I say he's guilty.Comment
-
Q: Why do they call O.J. "Juice"?
A: Because he beat his wife to a pulp.
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
Wrong question, everyone knows he is innocent, the question should be, did he do it or not?
Big difference.Comment
-
This is true, did he do it? I say Hells Yes!Originally posted by baddog
ICQ: 218503927
AIM: DannyDksComment
-
Is the pope catholic?Comment
-
I think he's guilty.
Comment
-
Guilty or innocent of what?
Why wasn't anything in the news or on tv regarding this?Comment
-
When OJ started dating again, he was quoted as saying
"I'd like to take another stab at it"Comment
-
agreed!Originally posted by slipkid
Need a Text Writer?
Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories
ICQ: 397892500
Comment
-
naw he's innocent, i killed her.. and they still haven't caught me...
bwahahahahahaha
for the feds that lurk around here, yes, i'm just kidding around <^>Comment
-
Innocent, not "legally innocent".Originally posted by baddog
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
He is as innocent as Michael Jackson in a middle school
.Comment
-
he did it
- VOYEUR /HOMEMADE, HENTAI / CARTOON, Reality, Amateur, Shemale, Hardcore, Cuckold, Celebrity, Retro/Vintage, ect...ALL OUR SITES >>
- Unbelievable Ratio | High % of Rebills | Bi-Monthly Payments (also to E-Passporte)
- Ton's of EXCLUSIVE Free content & FHG's |=> GREAT REVENUE $$$ GUARANTEED!
Comment
-
He likes kids that old?Originally posted by PussyManHe is as innocent as Michael Jackson in a middle school
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
Are you Colin D. from "Building An Empire"?Originally posted by Almighty ColinComment
-
All I know is that he was rich
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Almighty Colin
hahahahahhaha
that wasn't funny but then again it was
ICQ: 309756847
]Comment
-
I think he's guilty! They pulled the race card and it worked. Many, many, MANY black people defended him because he was known as a positive black icon. He was a great football player turned part time actor. Cultural Icons represent their people that's why they can't fail.
I think if O.J. would've been a regular or a thug black dude killing his white woman, he would've been locked up for at least 25 years...
Comment
-
Anyone who knows anything about science knows he is guilty of murdering both his ex wife and Ron Goldman. That question has already been answered beyond a shadow of a doubt. We leave it to the uneducated to even dispute this, for whatever reasons they may be harboring.Comment
-
Yeah, it´s tough to say, but i think he is guilty
Bryan D
ICQ: 293214625
!!!Coming Soon!!!Comment
-
innocent, mark fuhrman tried to frame himOxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013Comment
-
oh.....he was like sooooooooooooooo innocent.......4 shizzle....
Comment
-
He was quilty...no doubt !Originally posted by Almighty Colin
IvyComment
-
What the hell ya been up to, Steve?Originally posted by Steve
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
Originally posted by XxXotic
Yep its always good to try and frame someone BEFORE you even know what all the other officers on the scene, and there were 50 there before him, were finding and collecting.
What a ridiculous statement. Mark Fuhrman was played as a race card pure and simple to appeal to the jury and the bad feeling for the LAPD. Examine the entire chronology of events closely; Fuhrman planted nothing, he collected no blood (how do you account for the blood trail leading to OJ's place with HIS blood?).......did Fuhrman slice up OJ's finger too? did Fuhrman doctor the photos of OJ wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that matched the shoeprints found at the murder scene, a fact that OJ lied about that he never owned such shoes.............he lied because he knew it was likely they had his shoeprints there at the scene.................the fact is, it was an incredibly sloppy murder done out of rage and passion.
Save the conspiracy bullshit for something worthy.Comment
-
10+ years later and this is still being asked?
HIGHEST PAYOUTS FOR NO-CONSOLE TOURS IN THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY!
THIS SIG CAN BE YOURS FOR $200 - ICQ: 78881543Comment
-
Actually, he was "not guilty", not "innocent". Big differenceOriginally posted by baddog
.Comment
-
i'm sure he did itComment
-
yup i totally think he did it.Comment
-
Mark Fuhrman didn't have to try to frame him. The LAPD and investigators bungled the case from minute one. Then the prosecution got the Hollywood bug and put on a farce. People often say there was jury nullification involved in the OJ case, but an all white jury would have found him not guilty based on that prosecution's case if they followed the letter of the law during deliberations. The civil trial on the otherhand was another story. With "making a name/new career" for the pundits out of the equation they were able to do what was needed to do to get a judgment..Comment
-
No he was innocent.
That's because he was hilarious in the Naked Gun movies. You can't be funny and guilty at the same time.
Comment
-
Definetly guilty.Comment
-
Moses. Accused of killing an Egyptian. Was he guilty or innocent?Originally posted by sickkittens
skype = "adultdatelink"Comment
-
But he said "niggger"!Originally posted by Bansheelinks
Yep its always good to try and frame someone BEFORE you even know what all the other officers on the scene, and there were 50 there before him, were finding and collecting.
What a ridiculous statement. Mark Fuhrman was played as a race card pure and simple to appeal to the jury and the bad feeling for the LAPD. Examine the entire chronology of events closely; Fuhrman planted nothing, he collected no blood (how do you account for the blood trail leading to OJ's place with HIS blood?).......did Fuhrman slice up OJ's finger too? did Fuhrman doctor the photos of OJ wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that matched the shoeprints found at the murder scene, a fact that OJ lied about that he never owned such shoes.............he lied because he knew it was likely they had his shoeprints there at the scene.................the fact is, it was an incredibly sloppy murder done out of rage and passion.
Save the conspiracy bullshit for something worthy.Unvaxxed, still alive.Comment
-
Based on the evidence he's innocent. Toooo many fuckups.
The one thing that did it for me were those footprints at the crime scene. Any old time fan of OJ knows he's the most bowlegged, pigeon toed dude on the gridiron. Even when they took those pics of him wearing those Bruno Magli shoes his foot is bent so far in you can see his ankles. Not only that, but the picture of him wearing those shoes was taken at a stadium with tens of thousands of people but only ONE pic of him showed up??? Like thousands of other people attending an historic event didn't bring their cameras?
So those footprints were side by side even-steven. Like OJ suddenly could perform a mircale and straighten out a lifetime bone disorder?
Oh yeah, kinda odd how them footprints are barely noticeable once they trail off toward the back gate but for some strange reason Furman could see damn near a full print inside a car at night to the detail of size and brand of shoe.
Also, Dr. Lee the forensics expert said after the trial that one piece of evidence not allowed to be admitted was that bloody glove. The prosecution said OJ climbed over a fence and dropped a bloody glove but there was no blood anywhere to be found on the thick foliage on top of the fence! Yes, OJ has non blood staining plants he got when he traded in his cow for magic non blood staining seeds.
Oh yeah, the glove, hat, didn't fit eithers.
No it wasn't OJ it was Detective Frank Drebben who was moonlighting selling ginsu knife sets and his clumsiness got out of hand.Comment
-
I think that he was guilty. It shouldnt take that much to prove that you are innocent.Comment
-
wtf does collecting evidence have to do with mark trying to frame OJ? picture this then tell me how the fuck cops being there have ANYTHING TO DO WITH ITOriginally posted by Bansheelinks
Yep its always good to try and frame someone BEFORE you even know what all the other officers on the scene, and there were 50 there before him, were finding and collecting.
What a ridiculous statement. Mark Fuhrman was played as a race card pure and simple to appeal to the jury and the bad feeling for the LAPD. Examine the entire chronology of events closely; Fuhrman planted nothing, he collected no blood (how do you account for the blood trail leading to OJ's place with HIS blood?).......did Fuhrman slice up OJ's finger too? did Fuhrman doctor the photos of OJ wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that matched the shoeprints found at the murder scene, a fact that OJ lied about that he never owned such shoes.............he lied because he knew it was likely they had his shoeprints there at the scene.................the fact is, it was an incredibly sloppy murder done out of rage and passion.
Save the conspiracy bullshit for something worthy.
mark sees nicole, gets his mack on she turns him down. he gets mad and kills her and her fruity ass crackhead boyfriend and plants the evidence at OJ's house. reports go into the police, cops arrive at OJ's and find planted evidence.
this is like 3rd grade shit here man, you don't have to be the 1st cop on scene in order to frame someone, hell furman didn't even need to show up to OJ's house at all and he STILL could have framed him. It's not hard to do, especially when you have access like furman would have had at the time.
I don't actually believe this theory but it *IS* possibleOxeo - Serious Hosting For Serious Webmasters. iCQ:135.887013Comment
-
boy oh boyOriginally posted by XxXotic
@-)
8-xComment
-
Heh heh, this question is much like a religion or politics question.I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...
Webair, bitches.Comment
-
there's a lot of stupid people out there perfectly willing to dismiss DNA evidence for whatever reasons, be they political, racial, or out of ignorance due to a lack of education.............its the dumbed-down tabloid mentality.
when it comes to homicide, i'll put my faith in forensics over the inflammatory demagogue, Johnnie Cochran. if you still think he's innocent, do some reading and investigation...............and if thats too hard, go back to your taped episodes of "Hard Copy" and "A Current Affair"Comment
-
He killed her.Comment
Comment