Kim Dot Com - This is why crazed narcissists always crash and burn in the end [VIDEO]

[TheSquealer]

Look at this little narcissist ready to have another meltdown. Paul and his wife NEVER, read this again, NEVER said they met you. Paraphrased some of your replies to prove it was impossible too meet you, yes.

The interesting part? You, supposedly setup all this and go to a foreign country for a shoot, eat dinner at his house, watch a game and leave. BUT you have ZERO email's or ANY correspondence leading up to or after the fact. All you have are pictures of Paul that have been posted on here years ago by another nick.

You don't even have supporting pictures of your trip? Who the fuck goes all they way to CZ and only takes pictures of Paul? - Well, of course, that would be TheSquealer. Yup, we believe you!

Of course I have pics. You defending a known liar caught lying WITH pictures to back it up says quite a bit about you. I even described the inside of his house and studios in tremendous details... none of which he refuted and made it pretty obvious that I had been there. Should I dig up correspondence from 2004? Um...

Who said I didn't have pics of my trips? I have 1000s. I have maybe a 100 or so that I saved from the few times I've been to Brno. They aren't exactly relevant to meeting Paul, are they? I have some pics of the cathedral, the market downtown, a cool mural on a wall that shows a thief walking on a ledge outside a window etc.The pics I posted are relevant because he even denied that I was there (or that anyone was) in what he said was the ONLY outdoor shoot he'd ever done and that clearly wasn't true and pretty hard to forget that two people flew from another country and were standing right there.

BTW... i am far from narcissistic. I don't have enough self esteem for that.

[Struggle4Bucks]

btw i love how you use an example where the store itself commits the crime to argue for sanctions against an entity that does not upload infringing content themselves.

an actually analog would be closing down a weed shop because a customer sells coke in the bathroom.

Which btw i think is bullshit argument too

No... I think my analog was just perfect and you know exactly what I mean

[MaDalton]

mega upload complied with dcma take down notices, The pointing to the files/removing only the offending pointers (url) still complied with the dmca remove access option.

you are so full of shit that a scat movie is kindergarten compared to your pitty existance

every fucking ass involved with the whole MU thing knew what they were doing, at every minute. may a few laws helped them out at some point, it will catch up.

and at some point it will catch up with you as well and will not be pretty...

[The Heron]

That video fucking sucked, I lost interest after 5 seconds and still don't know what he was selling. 'change'? guys fat and dumb that's all I got from it.

[2012]

[signupdamnit]

I might say he has a point if he sold all his crap and lived on 30k a year giving the rest to charity or to fund fringe free software products. But he's just some fat millionaire living a life of luxury who got busted for stealing everyone elses' shit for his own personal gain. He's not improving technology, making innovations or supporting internet freedom. It's a load of shit. He's about fattening his pockets.

[PiracyPitbull]

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,”

What an odd quote lol, it makes no sense with how completely different the two systems operate.....apples and oranges. Try again Woz.

[DTK]

ok maybe it was some other board, but you damned well know you said that.

What? No response to this? What a surprise.

[gideongallery]

What? No response to this? What a surprise.

already said i never said that

if you want me to say it again

i never made that post, it was not me

[Major (Tom)]

vcr sold for 1k each (timeshifting)

diamond rio sold for $32 (format shifting)


both made money from the "unauthorized" use of copy written work

and both fair uses were ultimately established by the courts

If that was actually the rule neither of those things would have happened,.


the courts explicitly prove you wrong.

pls go away. I'm asking you kindly
ds

[DTK]

already said i never said that

if you want me to say it again

i never made that post, it was not me

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...8#post17755215

what is your next lie going to be? you really are a fucked up little piece of shit.

[gideongallery]

- you are pulling numbers out of your ass yourself... and what do you mean: "again"? Please read my
other posts and tell me where did you find me pulling numbers out of my ass before...

want to bet which number is closer to correct

100k says it not 99.999% infringing as you claimed

i have no problem taking that bet because the 70% came from eff claim on behalf of the users who wanted their files back.

-DMCA the law that facilitates crime! It would be better when Filesharing sites were forced to check uploaded content before actually posting it...

-mega upload is the equavalent to getting robbed for producers! If people like Dan Bull are getting hurt by the shut down... that`s too bad for them... they really should be complaining at MU itself... not at the FBI...

- Am I talking about "exactly the same thing"? Please tell me... where did I do that! Please don`t try to put words in my mouth that I didn`t say only to try to strengthen your weak story! Let him post on youtube or where ever the fuck... I don`t care where... I don`t run his business... I`m not his manager!
If you love him so much why don`t you tell him what to do...

- your talking about completely rewriting the laws to MAKE mega upload guilty Yes... let`s fill all holes in law and make mega upload very guilty!

so you have access to lawsuits against the individual uploaders


for 100/month you can get any of the takedown services to get all your content down

but that not enough you want to fuck over all the independent artist using mega upload legimately

because you don't want to spend 100/month.

if you want the laws to be re-written that way then hell yes the entire porn industry should be wiped out Complete bullshit! Based on nothing...

except the fact that 15 year old was featured on reality kings porn site.

The child was raped (statutory rape is still rape)

raping children is worth less then 100/month to you.

If the first amendment rights of artist like Dan Bull can be taken away because you don't like the current laws (DMCA safe harbor provision)

It`s not a first amandment law that Dan Bull has the right to upload content to Mega Upload. If Mega Upload decided to stop their business because they wanted to do something else, then the first amendment would stop them doing that only because Dan Bull wants to upload his shit to MegaUpoad?

except the government shut the site down not mega upload.

that the religious right should have the same right to wipe you out to protect the children.
Why should the religious right wipe me out to protect the children...????Like I do anything wrong to children? I`m an ADULT producer! Are you accusing me of something I don`t know? Please inform me!

fact the entire filelocker industry has been effected by the megaupload takedown
the affiliate programs that allowed artist like dan bull to make money while using the try it if you like donate model have been wiped out.

so the damage to a business model is INDUSTRY wide.

Same principle applies you belong to an industry that allowed 15 year old to be featured in a porn video.

The reasonable position that you can't be held responsible for the actions of others (fake id of the model vs uploading actions of the infringer) should apply to EVERYONE or NO ONEYou are talking like this shit happens on a daily basis and that all producers are confronted with these issues. It`s very rare and I don`t know other cases. So if you state that the whole porn industry will be shutdown because fake id``s are popping up on a daily basis at all producers... then you are not taking yourself serious! On the other hand... Mega Upload knows exactly that copyrighted materials are uploaded to the site every day on a very large scale... so the "reasonable position" simply does not aplly on that situation!

how do you know it is not. The only reason we know about the reality king case was because mother sued reality kings and they were forced to defend themselves in an open court.


Had that not happened no one would have known it about this 15 year old getting raped.

It could be covered up 100 of times a week /day in the entire porn industry.

The file lockers are an open system, they are public to the world, the infringement can be found by anyone (and misrepresented like adult king did when he misrepresented david banners album, and a main stream movie (authorized distribution)as porn/infringement)

http://stopfilelockers.com/filegag-p...vestigation-2/

http://davidbanner.com

The fact is you guys could easily verify identities to the same level as for bonded employees making a formal request for every id associated with social insurance number.

you don't, and you know full well that the substandard validation has a proven record of allowing a 15 year old to get thru. (hell according to the court transcripts reality kings goes above and beyond the industry standard process be requiring multiple ids).

And a kid being raped is way worse then losing a small/medium percentage of your income.

Especially when you take into account the fact that the pornstars who are getting paid only $800/scene could use the same dan bull style technique and make way more money.

[gideongallery]

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showt...8#post17755215

what is your next lie going to be? you really are a fucked up little piece of shit.

not me just someone else who claimed the name on that board.

[topnotch, standup guy]

already said i never said that

if you want me to say it again

i never made that post, it was not me

Somebody using your screenname sure as hell did and, moreover, the wording sounded exactly like your usual tripe.

Having said that:

a) I'm too lazy to search for the precise WJ post.
b) It happed right after you were chased from here, so it might well have been someone trolling you.

Be that as it may.. you, not at all unlike David Duke, have become so intrinsically associated with certain verbiage that - like it or not - you end up owning the words no matter who said them.

That's the way this shit works.

[DTK]

not me just someone else who claimed the name on that board.

i knew you were going to say that. i'm pretty sure i don't believe you.

[topnotch, standup guy]

I for sure am not "pro piracy" anything. I just dislike anon troll posers who like to beat-up on 65 year old cancer survivors. Also, who is so mentally distorted for attention, will lie in great detail about being on a shoot and using others photos as part of his lie.

Finally, when questioned to post correspondence, says he deleted them, but still has Paul's photos on his HD after 7 years?

TheSquealer = 5'6" fatass anon clown poser looking for attention.

Fair enough. I apologize for having drawn darker conclusions from your post.

Shit being what it is nowadays, some of us can be a little too quick to presume the worst from others. My apologies once again.

[topnotch, standup guy]

I think he doesn't like me. But then again, he believes the government took advantage of the 9/11 WTC attacks to spontaneously launch a missile at the Pentagon with the intent of hiding some book keeping irregularities, so i'm ok with it.

Well, I'm not going to comment your feud with Jesus. It's really none of my business.

I will say this though...

Most times, both of you sound pretty cool as long as you're not discussing conspiracies, Paul Markham or each other

[lazycash]

Look at this little narcissist ready to have another meltdown. Paul and his wife NEVER, read this again, NEVER said they met you. Paraphrased some of your replies to prove it was impossible too meet you, yes.

The interesting part? You, supposedly setup all this and go to a foreign country for a shoot, eat dinner at his house, watch a game and leave. BUT you have ZERO email's or ANY correspondence leading up to or after the fact. All you have are pictures of Paul that have been posted on here years ago by another nick.

You don't even have supporting pictures of your trip? Who the fuck goes all they way to CZ and only takes pictures of Paul? - Well, of course, that would be TheSquealer. Yup, we believe you!

Actually, after thesquealer posted very specific details as well as pictures of Paul's photo shoot, Paul admitted he had forgotten about the visit and dinner. http://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18258126&postcount=316

[lazycash]

Fuck off LC you should know better as I corner this anon. Besides re-read what Paul wrote, he was being rhetorical and sarcastic.

Paul admitted twice in that post and has done elsewhere that he forgot theSquealer had came to visit him. Paul does dispute some theSquealer's details of their visit, but the fact that they did indeed meet is not a question.

[gideongallery]

Somebody using your screenname sure as hell did and, moreover, the wording sounded exactly like your usual tripe.

Having said that:

a) I'm too lazy to search for the precise WJ post.
b) It happed right after you were chased from here, so it might well have been someone trolling you.

Be that as it may.. you, not at all unlike David Duke, have become so intrinsically associated with certain verbiage that - like it or not - you end up owning the words no matter who said them.

That's the way this shit works.

i knew you were going to say that. i'm pretty sure i don't believe you.

easy enough to prove

try getting the password by entering an email you know belongs to me

you guys have the information to test that out

if you do you will find you will always get the

You have not entered an email address that we recognize. Please try again or contact the administrator.

message

btw that site is mainstream and supports the connect with facebook option so would not use not use the gideon gallery pseudonym or any pseudonym

[lazycash]

Let me get this straight, believe your interpretation, theSquealer, or Paul's wife? Fuck off clown...he had his chance to post correspondence, but he didn't do it. Why? Because he's lying and just parroting another who "was" there.

Just believe Paul, who keeps emails from 2004?

[DTK]

easy enough to prove

try getting the password by entering an email you know belongs to me

you guys have the information to test that out

if you do you will find you will always get the



message

btw that site is mainstream and supports the connect with facebook option so would not use not use the gideon gallery pseudonym or any pseudonym

dude, i don't who the hell you think you're kidding, but carry on i guess

[topnotch, standup guy]

No worries, but I will flip one back at you. I for damn sure not pointing fingers, but what bothers me is when content producers scream (as they should) they're content is being stolen when they did NOTHING as carders used their content.

Meaning, even you have to admit it hard for non-content producers to jump on your anti-tube cause?

Not sure I follow you here. Perhaps that's because I never learned how to do the shady shit.

I'm one of them old school guys that sleazy worms like Far-L love to hate.

I spend my own money producing content and if the surfers want to see it, I'd rather appreciate it if they paid me (and my affiliates) to do so.

Too much to ask? You and I both know the answer to that question.

[topnotch, standup guy]

Not instigating anything personal, just curious on why there was never any talk about collectively cleaning house first. This way you'll get more people receptive to your cause of stopping piracy.

Perhaps that's because the honest amongst us expected (hoped) to be discerned as such and treated accordingly.

Niave expectations to be sure.

But now that it's crunch time, it's all about the common enemy.

Think Stalin/Hitler followed by Stalin/Churchill/Roosevelt.

When the shit hits the fan, you gotta do what you gotta do.
.

[Gozarian]

Email his boss. The info is on the board.

Been there done that !!

[Gozarian]

Leave it to a blithering Indian from Kenya residing in Canada to tell Americans about US court system and stare decisis. You are like a dog chasing his tail.

Further if you knew a damn thing about Bieyanka Moore, you would know the entire thing was a money grab by her and her duplicitous mother. RK followed ALL applicable laws and reported the incidence to the FBI themselves.

gfy

[Struggle4Bucks]

want to bet which number is closer to correct

100k says it not 99.999% infringing as you claimed

i have no problem taking that bet because the 70% came from eff claim on behalf of the users who wanted their files back.





so you have access to lawsuits against the individual uploaders


for 100/month you can get any of the takedown services to get all your content down

but that not enough you want to fuck over all the independent artist using mega upload legimately

because you don't want to spend 100/month.





except the fact that 15 year old was featured on reality kings porn site.

The child was raped (statutory rape is still rape)

raping children is worth less then 100/month to you.





except the government shut the site down not mega upload.


fact the entire filelocker industry has been effected by the megaupload takedown
the affiliate programs that allowed artist like dan bull to make money while using the try it if you like donate model have been wiped out.

so the damage to a business model is INDUSTRY wide.

Same principle applies you belong to an industry that allowed 15 year old to be featured in a porn video.






how do you know it is not. The only reason we know about the reality king case was because mother sued reality kings and they were forced to defend themselves in an open court.


Had that not happened no one would have known it about this 15 year old getting raped.

It could be covered up 100 of times a week /day in the entire porn industry.

The file lockers are an open system, they are public to the world, the infringement can be found by anyone (and misrepresented like adult king did when he misrepresented david banners album, and a main stream movie (authorized distribution)as porn/infringement)

http://stopfilelockers.com/filegag-p...vestigation-2/

http://davidbanner.com

The fact is you guys could easily verify identities to the same level as for bonded employees making a formal request for every id associated with social insurance number.

you don't, and you know full well that the substandard validation has a proven record of allowing a 15 year old to get thru. (hell according to the court transcripts reality kings goes above and beyond the industry standard process be requiring multiple ids).

And a kid being raped is way worse then losing a small/medium percentage of your income.

Especially when you take into account the fact that the pornstars who are getting paid only $800/scene could use the same dan bull style technique and make way more money.

Ohh... you really think i`m going to read all that garbage shit? I`m not going to read any more of this negative energy.... Why the fuck should I? LOL... was I just starting to react on this again? Why... to try to convince someone that obviously walks around with his head in his ass?You`re a sophist with your fallacies... and you could well be Kim himself... at least someone that has interest in this kind of scam... anyway... have a good life... goodbye... i`m sorry... i`m not gonna waste anymore time on guys like you...

[DWB]

When crimes occur through the mail, you don?t shut the post office down. - Steve Wozniak

That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.

If the post office was mostly used for criminal activities, they would shut it down in a second flat.

[Jel]

I just dislike anon troll posers who like to beat-up on 65 year old cancer survivors.

Change '65 year old cancer survivors' for 'dumb stupid cunts who got lucky then failed when things became business but harp on about all the 'knowledge' and 'business acumen' they have, and continually tell successful people with a proven track record that they are doing everything wrong', and that statement would still be untrue, but far more accurate.

[Gozarian]

That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.

If the post office was mostly used for criminal activities, they would shut it down in a second flat.

The Woz is still smoking da kine buds from years ago.

[Gozarian]

gideon - do the world a favor & please try some bath salts

[gideongallery]

That may be the dumbest thing I've ever read.

If the post office was mostly used for criminal activities, they would shut it down in a second flat.

70 % of all files were only downloaded once or less

so your already have a majority of it being totally legit

While Megaupload made efforts to curb abuse of its service, it recognized a competing obligation to its users who legitimately use[d] the service to store their own copies of copyrighted material. For example, a music file that was purchased or covered by fair use and uploaded by a user for the purpose of ?space shifting? (where media files stored on one device are accessed by the owner from another device) would look the same to Megaupload's automated processes as a music file to which the user had no legal right.

This obligation to its users who had a legal right to the files they stored presented an ongoing problem because the company was committed to ensuring that there was a proper and legitimate basis to require a data file to be removed. As a result, where a user was subject to a proper and specific take down notice for their unique link or URL, that user?s link to the file in question was taken down or broken.

The DMCA recognizes such complexities when it declares that Service providers (such as Megaupload) are not required to ?monitor its service or affirmatively seek out facts indicating infringing activity,? 17 U.S.C. § 512(m)(1).

of the remaining 30%

when you consider the differences between country laws (ie canada piracy tax etc)

maybe 1/2 of that is potentially infringing

and if they met the requirements of the safe harbor (something which many legal experts say they do given the wording about denying ACCESS (as an option). That goes to zero.

[gideongallery]

Leave it to a blithering Indian from Kenya residing in Canada to tell Americans about US court system and stare decisis. You are like a dog chasing his tail.

Further if you knew a damn thing about Bieyanka Moore, you would know the entire thing was a money grab by her and her duplicitous mother. RK followed ALL applicable laws and reported the incidence to the FBI themselves.

gfy

and so did mega upload

they more than complied with dmca take downs


if your defending RK for following the letter of the law, that they know isn't good enough rather then doing a security check that would actually solve the problem (bondable employee)

Then the same principle applies to companies like mega upload who also fully comply with dmca.

[slapass]

What a fucking clown. Hey Kim Dotcom - you know why your site was incredibly popular, and it wasn't because people wanted to share legitimate content they owned.

This is it right here.

[slapass]

Then the same principle applies to companies like mega upload who also fully comply with dmca.

It would if they did. They did not. This was pretty provable with the evidence. It was a bad serve on the warrant, not a loack of proof of wrong doing.

[gideongallery]

It would if they did. They did not. This was pretty provable with the evidence. It was a bad serve on the warrant, not a lack of proof of wrong doing.

Reread the complaint the entire argument about not complying with the DMCA was because

1. stored the file once and created unique pointers for each user
2. they removed links (that were reported) to the content rather then removing the original file. (removed access not the content)


Many legal experts have come to the conclusion that is good enough given the fact that the DMCA gives the service provider the choice between removing the file and removing access

if the person described in paragraph (1)(A) makes that material available online without the authorization of the copyright owner of the material, the service provider responds expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing upon notification of claimed infringement as described in subsection (c)(3), except that this subparagraph applies only if—

given the fact that the same exact file could have an infringing use (distribution) and a non infringing use (backup, space shifting) depending on if the unique url was shared or not shared it really was the only way they could do what they both prevent infringement and serve those people who were using the service legitimately.

[Nautilus]

"What about free speech" - yeah, exactly, what about it, where do we see it is either oppressed or restricted? What's wrong with the free speech? Fat fag is speaking freely, even while under investigation. He's posting at some of the most popular sites in the world, addresses people and is allowed to say basically anything he wants. He's even singing and addresses president himself, and quite probably his clip was already seen by president. So wtf is exactly wrong with the free speech? Bloodsucker is enjoying it to the most extreme, when he has something to say - whatever he says gets reported and reposted by thousands of media outlets including even big TV channels sometimes.

Whatever posting a cracked Windows of Photoshop and selling it for profit has to do with the free speach? Because selling of stolen shit is the only thing that the fat fag is accused of doing, and denied of doing. But when HE himself has something to say, which is pretty much different from stealing commercial products such as Windows of Photoshop - he's allowed to say anything, in any form, and basically he's allowed to address the whole world, and he's doing just that. So wtf is wrong with the free speech?

[gideongallery]

It would if they did. They did not. This was pretty provable with the evidence. It was a bad serve on the warrant, not a loack of proof of wrong doing.

btw if it was just a bad serve on a warrent and all the previously collected evidence proved they were guilty

all the government would have to do is drop the current charges, and re issue a new warrant


it a lot more than that.

from the jurisdictional issue that means they should even have a right to charge them

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...suit-you.shtml


to the 50,000 legitimate users who had their property taken

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...al-files.shtml

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...-content.shtml

to the hundreds of artist who have come forward because they used mega upload for self promotion/payment.



to the use of civil liability of inducement as a justification for criminal prosecution even though there is no criminal liability for inducement.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...ismiss.shtml:(

to the illegal warrant

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...-illegal.shtml

[gideongallery]

"What about free speech" - yeah, exactly, what about it, where do we see it is either oppressed or restricted? What's wrong with the free speech? Fat fag is speaking freely, even while under investigation. He's posting at some of the most popular sites in the world, addresses people and is allowed to say basically anything he wants. He's even singing and addresses president himself, and quite probably his clip was already seen by president. So wtf is exactly wrong with the free speech? Bloodsucker is enjoying it to the most extreme, when he has something to say - whatever he says gets reported and reposted by thousands of media outlets including even big TV channels sometimes.

Whatever posting a cracked Windows of Photoshop and selling it for profit has to do with the free speach? Because selling of stolen shit is the only thing that the fat fag is accused of doing, and denied of doing. But when HE himself has something to say, which is pretty much different from stealing commercial products such as Windows of Photoshop - he's allowed to say anything, in any form, and basically he's allowed to address the whole world, and he's doing just that. So wtf is wrong with the free speech?

it not kim.com free speech that being censored it the small indie artist like dan bull who can't get their songs on the radio because their unsigned

and are now prevented from using mega upload as the radio alternative because it was shut down.

[Jel]

People still reply to this troll/idiot? You have way too much free fucking time on your hands...

[Gozarian]

aaron you are as big an ass clown as Kim. Ass lick him as he is obviously your hero.
Just stay the fuck out of my country

[Gozarian]

aaron fuck off - do the world a huge favor and crawl back under you rock and suck Kim's cock

[Young]

100 examples of GFY Logic

Which if you're paying attention is....

Pornhub (tube8, etc etc) and it's operators somehow ok (most of you praise them and comment on every thread they create on this board)

Megaupload and it's operator a scumbag

O.K. Got it.

[DWB]

........

[campimp]

catchy tune

[xXXtesy10]

More OWS shit...Occupy Weed Shop