|
|
|
|
||||
|
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
 |
|
|||||||
| Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
10-24-2007, 08:35 PM
|
#1 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,576
|
a thought regarding the 2257 news
Are people going to start scrapping their 2257 statements?
__________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P226 |
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 08:42 PM
|
#2 |
|
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ICQ: 211-417-740
Posts: 5,223
|
I highly doubt that
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 08:43 PM
|
#3 | |
|
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: the beach, SoCal
Posts: 107,089
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 08:54 PM
|
#4 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,576
|
I agree, it would be foolish to take it down.
I'm not exactly clear though on all the implications of the recent ruling. Does this mean the FBI 2257 inspection team is now out of work? I haven't read it in full yet but just scanned it and got an idea of what's up. I'd like to know how things are actually going to change.
__________________
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIG_Sauer_P226 |
|
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 09:40 PM
|
#5 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 350
|
i wouldnt. who knows they may try to overturn it or something. But what a Victory!
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 09:49 PM
|
#6 |
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Do you care?
Posts: 4,147
|
read this very carefully. http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objecti...4C18A90EAF3674
only tennesee, ohio and some other state are out of the loop for now. well, from the article thats what i can decipher.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:01 PM
|
#7 | |
|
It's coming look busy
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn".
Posts: 35,299
|
Quote:
As for the main question though, not only will I not ditch my 2257 documents, I will continue to cross reference, digitally track, as well as only purchase content that is what was known as 2257 compliant. Still fairly certain ignorance is not a defense and I really do not wish to be the first in a court room saying well they told me she was 18 when I ordered that content. My question is this, can those who were inspected in California as well as Florida go back to the courts and claim that the searches were illegal due to the fact that 2257 is unconstitutional and thus force rulings in other districts?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:12 PM
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 17
|
Would not be smart to throw 2257 to the wind.
__________________
Amateur Porn Dollars |
|
|
|
