Anyone noticed? Streamate/Mtree Vs Google for whitelabel 'thin content' penalties?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • adultmobile
    No, I am not banned
    • Nov 2003
    • 5345
    #1

    Anyone noticed? Streamate/Mtree Vs Google for whitelabel 'thin content' penalties?

    Anyone noticed? Streamate/Mtree Vs Google for whitelabel 'thin content' penalties in search ranking:

    Complaint:

    http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cg...ext=historical

    This is in November 2013, Streamate (ICF) complained (asked damages) about Google sending to thousands of whitelabel affiliates the notice of "Webmaster or Quality Guidelines" violation, "thin content". Also defamation because Google mailed all those affiliates who freaked out.

    But, on 20th Dec 2013, judge didn't care to proceed injuction:

    ICF Technology, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 2:2013cv02068 - Document 28 (W.D. Wash. 2013) :: Justia

    Because, Google made nothing wrong or unwarranted... whitelabels are "thin content" according to Google guidelines and Google just done his job.

    TubeCamGirl.com
    Tags: None
    • j3rkules
      VIP
      • Jul 2013
      • 22111
      #2
      LiveJasmin is one of the biggest spammers on internet. Popups, popunders, banners... you name it. All kind of annoying things you can imagine, LiveJasmin uses and uses it heavily. And then, they have these WLs all from the same IP with duplicated content. On Google's eyes, these WLs are not individual sites, they are all the same sites belonging to the same company that is a well known spammer.

      However, this does not mean you should drop your WL. You just have to find another way to drive traffic there, and not rely on search engines.

        Comment

        • 3xmedia
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2004
          • 5738
          #3
          Originally posted by jerkules
          LiveJasmin is one of the biggest spammers on internet. Popups, popunders, banners... you name it. All kind of annoying things you can imagine, LiveJasmin uses and uses it heavily. And then, they have these WLs all from the same IP with duplicated content. On Google's eyes, these WLs are not individual sites, they are all the same sites belonging to the same company that is a well known spammer.

          However, this does not mean you should drop your WL. You just have to find another way to drive traffic there, and not rely on search engines.
          why do you copy the posts from other boards, worthless sig spammer?

          ---

            Comment

            • AdultKing
              Raise Your Weapon
              • Jun 2003
              • 15601
              #4
              Originally posted by jerkules
              LiveJasmin ....
              The tube themes in your sig suck by the way.

              It looks like it was designed by a retarded elephant using crayons.

              Not to mention these "importers"

                Comment

                • LatinaCamChat
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 571
                  #5
                  Originally posted by 3xmedia
                  why do you copy the posts from other boards, worthless sig spammer?

                  ...

                    Comment

                    • blinki bill
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 123
                      #6
                      Originally posted by 3xmedia
                      why do you copy the posts from other boards, worthless sig spammer?

                      lol good find

                        Comment

                        • adultmobile
                          No, I am not banned
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 5345
                          #7
                          GFY investigators!

                          Anyone no one wrote an original reply on topic, yet.

                          TubeCamGirl.com

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...