GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Women prefer a 'feminine' appearance in partners... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=758492)

CreatineGuy 08-08-2007 01:50 AM

Women prefer a 'feminine' appearance in partners...
 
The world is turning gay.... And women are guilty in this, cause they look for a girlie guy who uses creams to prevent wrinkles, uses rogaine and propecia to prevent hair fallin out, and some even keep a tanned look and color their hair like metrosexual gays... Face it guys, women consider the gay look attractive. :mad:

A study shows that Girly men are perfect partners...

Women searching for the perfect partner avoid macho men in favour of feminine-looking types whom they see as more committed and better parents, research has found.

more info:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...08/nmen108.xml

http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_te...cle2844003.ece

Doctor Dre 08-08-2007 02:04 AM

They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

Sarah_Jayne 08-08-2007 02:27 AM

I don't see how that is a shock. After all, look at the number of women that drool over people like Orlando Bloom and and 'boyish men' like that. When I was younger I was more attracted to men that had fairly feminine eyes, etc.

Even now I really get turned off by ultra macho men and will go for the geek every time.

grumpy 08-08-2007 02:30 AM

thats why they all love juicy

Amysworld 08-08-2007 02:33 AM

I loves me a man with some hair on his chest. I feel secure. I love it. :)

Amy

Egypt[4TH-Reactor] 08-08-2007 02:56 AM

Not a shock definitely.

Plus I think it's fair, because for centuries women have been looking after themselves, trying to be more attractive, trying to be up to date in fashion and looks... Why shouldn't men do the same thing? :upsidedow

For example in the 20th-21st centuries men started to look after their bodies, working our in the gyms, tracking their meals. A lot of men are doing these things now. Why not add the other things to our armory? Why not taking care of skin, haircut, nails? Not too much of course, but they can be neat and good looking.

And one more example - in medieval times men took bath once a month. Shall we do the same thing nowadays? I doubt... :upsidedow

So it's just evolution, progress... however you call it :upsidedow

Oracle Porn 08-08-2007 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre (Post 12895121)
They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

nico-t 08-08-2007 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12895154)
I don't see how that is a shock. After all, look at the number of women that drool over people like Orlando Bloom and and 'boyish men' like that.

exactly, add leonardo dicaprio to that list.. the profile of dudes the majority of chicks like are skinny, babefaced dudes, otherwise known as the 'gay' style

Clark Miller 08-08-2007 04:04 AM

Try a little tenderness

Sarah_Jayne 08-08-2007 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 12895339)
exactly, add leonardo dicaprio to that list.. the profile of dudes the majority of chicks like are skinny, babefaced dudes, otherwise known as the 'gay' style

yup..leo was another one I was thinking about. Even Johnny Depp has a fem look but enough butch to be forgiven.

divine116 08-08-2007 04:46 AM

I think those kind of men are not really gay, they're just want to be more good looking and presentable!

nation-x 08-08-2007 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre (Post 12895121)
They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

exactly... the only reason some chicks say they want a feminine man is so they can run him... and they will cheat on him in a minute with an alpha male. I know this to be a fact because the girls I know that are like this are the easiest to fuck. :D

Jarmusch 08-08-2007 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amysworld (Post 12895166)
I loves me a man with some hair on his chest. I feel secure. I love it. :)

This must be the ultimate man - feminine, yet manly:

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k1...f_029/mob5.jpg

ZumberCraig 08-08-2007 06:34 AM

How many lawsuits do I have to file to get my picture off the fucking internet...

CaptainHowdy 08-08-2007 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarmusch (Post 12895592)
This must be the ultimate man - feminine, yet manly:

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k1...f_029/mob5.jpg

:1orglaugh :Oh crap ...

royaljelly2 08-08-2007 06:58 AM

EW nice picture :S

Violetta 08-08-2007 07:07 AM

shit that pic is nasty :(

Sarah_Jayne 08-08-2007 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jarmusch (Post 12895592)
This must be the ultimate man - feminine, yet manly:

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k1...f_029/mob5.jpg

Let's work on that little skin problem first.

ADL Josh 08-08-2007 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarah_MaxCash (Post 12897140)
Let's work on that little skin problem first.

i think the skin problem runs a close second to the huge man tits....lot to work on there, lol.

montel 08-08-2007 12:36 PM

i find it interesting to hear about the kind of men women SAY they like and then the kind of men women FUCK... survey results and reality are not always the same thing and i know for a fact they are not the same in this case.

women like powerful men...... nuff said. that is the no.1 selection factor for women.

rvincent 08-08-2007 12:55 PM

Women are like men: they fuck the one(s) that will make her friends jealous.

TubeTitans_SusieQ 08-08-2007 12:58 PM

It's true, A woman likes having a man that keeps up with his looks,the way they dress and hygiene. We try our best to look good for men we care for, I think men should do the same at most times

bausch 08-08-2007 01:04 PM

The most important thing for a woman is a man who doesn't cheat, appearance is secondary. And that's the most difficult thing to find because 95 percent of all men cheat or lie about.

solomonYBM 08-08-2007 01:05 PM

be a man and you will get your girl

collegeboobies 08-08-2007 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Egypt[4TH-Reactor] (Post 12895203)
Not a shock definitely.

Plus I think it's fair, because for centuries women have been looking after themselves, trying to be more attractive, trying to be up to date in fashion and looks... Why shouldn't men do the same thing? :upsidedow

For example in the 20th-21st centuries men started to look after their bodies, working our in the gyms, tracking their meals. A lot of men are doing these things now. Why not add the other things to our armory? Why not taking care of skin, haircut, nails? Not too much of course, but they can be neat and good looking.

And one more example - in medieval times men took bath once a month. Shall we do the same thing nowadays? I doubt... :upsidedow

So it's just evolution, progress... however you call it :upsidedow

men starting working out because the human lifestyle has changed into one that gets the body out of its natural form. go work in a field 8 hours a day like many people before that time and you wont need to workout or track meals.

The Sultan Of Smut 08-08-2007 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12897565)
The most important thing for a woman is a man who doesn't cheat, appearance is secondary. And that's the most difficult thing to find because 95 percent of all men cheat or lie about.

51% of married men and 47% of married women cheat last time I looked but anyway thanks for your input.

Baal.PitBull 08-08-2007 01:17 PM

Most of those surveys are done using 18-25 year old girls NOT Women. They think they know what they want, but, what they need is something completely different. They want some skinny makeup wearing closet homo, until leroy or jethro walks up to them in the movie parking lot demanding their purse. Then all of a sudden they want Batista to be there.

The fact is most of those sissy boys will stand there shivering while you get raped, hoping they'll be next.

bausch 08-08-2007 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut (Post 12897659)
51% of married men and 47% of married women cheat last time I looked but anyway thanks for your input.

I'm sure men cheat more though because they are genetically programmed to cheat. I read that it's unnatural for a man to be monogamous and it's not in their nature to be monogamous and that it's somehow encoded in their dna.

You know who else confirmed this with me? Pornwolf (from gfy), he says that women should accept their husband being unfaithful because that's just the way it is and if the woman loves her husband enough she should overlook infidelity because it's only sex and no big deal. And he said it's NOT natural for the woman to cheat and that it goes against human nature because women are child bearers. This is really what he said!

He also said I was naive for not believing this. What do you think of that?

Baal.PitBull 08-08-2007 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12897681)
I'm sure men cheat more though because they are genetically programmed to cheat. I read that it's unnatural for a man to be monogamous and it's not in their nature to be monogamous and that it's somehow encoded in their dna.

You know who else confirmed this with me? Pornwolf (from gfy), he says that women should accept their husband being unfaithful because that's just the way it is and if the woman loves her husband enough she should overlook infidelity because it's only sex and no big deal. And he said it's NOT natural for the woman to cheat and that it goes against human nature because women are child bearers. This is really what he said!

He also said I was naive for not believing this. What do you think of that?



The "norm" for human cultures is for the male to have as many wives as he can support. Its a natural fact! Look at any living organism. The males mate with as many females as possible to reproduce. It is only the strong influence of christianity that prohibits this. Left to nature a man should have as many "wives" as he is able to "support for" and "fight for".

Whats far more complexing is that even in the bible many of the heros had multiple wives. Yet today?

bausch 08-08-2007 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12897755)
The "norm" for human cultures is for the male to have as many wives as he can support. Its a natural fact! Look at any living organism. The males mate with as many females as possible to reproduce. It is only the strong influence of christianity that prohibits this. Left to nature a man should have as many "wives" as he is able to "support for" and "fight for".

Whats far more complexing is that even in the bible many of the heros had multiple wives. Yet today?

Some women make more money than their spouses and do not NEED a man to support them. Has that occurred to you?

There ARE women out there who make their OWN money and even OUTEARN their husbands/boyfriends. Some women do not WANT a man to support them. Don't flatter yourself and think that women need a man to support them, some wouldn't WANT ANY MONEY FROM YOU that and can support themselves fine, thank you.

Some women also do not need a man to "fight" for them. This is no longer the cave age where people get attacked by random tribes or whatever, a lot of women can FIGHT THEIR WAY THROUGH LIFE JUST FINE, and don' NEED a man to protect them.

Don't flatter yourself and think women want your money and need you to protect them.

woj 08-08-2007 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre (Post 12895121)
They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

very true :thumbsup

bausch 08-08-2007 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12897755)
The "norm" for human cultures is for the male to have as many wives as he can support. Its a natural fact! Look at any living organism. The males mate with as many females as possible to reproduce. It is only the strong influence of christianity that prohibits this. Left to nature a man should have as many "wives" as he is able to "support for" and "fight for".

Whats far more complexing is that even in the bible many of the heros had multiple wives. Yet today?

This is 2007, women do not need to be "supported" and "fought for", as I said, some women might actually earn more than YOU do and not need jack shit from you.

Don't assume that a woman needs your money or support. Some women are successful on their own and do not NEED a man to "take care of them".

How presumptuous!!!

There are plenty of women out there who make plenty of dough and buy their own bling and don't need anything from a man.

Baal.PitBull 08-08-2007 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12897788)
Some women make more money than their spouses and do not NEED a man to support them. Has that occurred to you?

There ARE women out there who make their OWN money and even OUTEARN their husbands/boyfriends. Some women do not WANT a man to support them. Don't flatter yourself and think that women need a man to support them, some wouldn't WANT ANY MONEY FROM YOU that and can support themselves fine, thank you.

Some women also do not need a man to "fight" for them. This is no longer the cave age where people get attacked by random tribes or whatever, a lot of women can FIGHT THEIR WAY THROUGH LIFE JUST FINE, and don' NEED a man to protect them.

Don't flatter yourself and think women want your money and need you to protect them.


flatter myself? LOL. Life does not revolve around money. Take away money and life goes on. Take away life?

Also ,if you haven't gone outside your door in a few years or read the news, almost 40% of this planet is populated by people who live in caves or huts or tents. Those that do have nice aptartments or homes are still surrounded by the homeless, the drug addicts, the gangbangers, etc etc etc.

And, its only a very small percentage of females that feel the way you do. I can say with confidence that in 80% of the cultures "world" wide they do not.

can you say material girl?

bausch 08-08-2007 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12897894)
flatter myself? LOL. Life does not revolve around money. Take away money and life goes on. Take away life?

Also ,if you haven't gone outside your door in a few years or read the news, almost 40% of this planet is populated by people who live in caves or huts or tents. Those that do have nice aptartments or homes are still surrounded by the homeless, the drug addicts, the gangbangers, etc etc etc.

And, its only a very small percentage of females that feel the way you do. I can say with confidence that in 80% of the cultures "world" wide they do not.

can you say material girl?

There is nothing wrong with being materialistic, it's all about money, but that doesn't mean that a woman needs A MAN to provide her with material goods. Some women have their own money and can afford to be as materialistic and shallow as they want with their OWN money.

Also, I never said I was a female so please don't assume anything about me. I could be. I could be not. I really dislike people just assuming things about me. Yes, I COULD be a female. Also I COULD be a male who thinks you are just being presumptuous, but since you don't know for certain, please don't assume.

Also, I merely mentioned money because you claimed women need a man to "provide for them" and "protect" them and therefore men are entitled to have many sex partners/cheat. I was only saying that you were wrong, since some women do provide for themselves. I mentioned money because you brought it up first.

HeadPimp 08-08-2007 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre (Post 12895121)
They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

AMEN!
They want a rich half gay guy to pay for their stuff and relate to them a big hairy bastard to plow their fields so to speak.

And they say women are more monogamous than men... HA!

bausch 08-08-2007 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeadPimp (Post 12897976)
AMEN!
They want a rich half gay guy to pay for their stuff and relate to them a big hairy bastard to plow their fields so to speak.

And they say women are more monogamous than men... HA!

I know a lot of women who prefer BROKE guys over guys with money because guys with money are more likely to cheat. Men with money have more options and opportunities to cheat. I know women who would rather take a chance on a poor dude because they are afraid of getting played by the rich guy.

Mutt 08-08-2007 02:42 PM

it's just cyclical - people's views of what is attractive in the opposite sex changes. when i was young I could never imagine that short hair would ever be cool and bald - hahaha - that used to be a horrible fate for a guy and they'd wear horrible rugs on their head. 20 years ago the masculine hairy look was what men and women wanted - Burt Reynolds, Tom Selleck, Sean Connery etc - guys with open shirts with a mat of black curly hair on their chest. women weren't gagging in horror - that was hot.

and now we are in the feminine looking guy stage - seems to be sticking around for a long time but believe me like everything else it will change again.

i hate body hair - i really do - if that laser shit was fast i'd be all over it.
hogtie me and hang me from the ceiling and laser my ass - but it has to be over in 2 hours max.

latinasojourn 08-08-2007 02:56 PM

well they might prefer the effeminate man until they have a flat tire, the dishwasher needs to be installed, or the house catches fire.

Baal.PitBull 08-08-2007 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12897956)
There is nothing wrong with being materialistic, it's all about money, but that doesn't mean that a woman needs A MAN to provide her with material goods. Some women have their own money and can afford to be as materialistic and shallow as they want with their OWN money.

Also, I never said I was a female so please don't assume anything about me. I could be. I could be not. I really dislike people just assuming things about me. Yes, I COULD be a female. Also I COULD be a male who thinks you are just being presumptuous, but since you don't know for certain, please don't assume.

Also, I merely mentioned money because you claimed women need a man to "provide for them" and "protect" them and therefore men are entitled to have many sex partners/cheat. I was only saying that you were wrong, since some women do provide for themselves. I mentioned money because you brought it up first.

Providing for and money are not the same thing, and MOST women do NOT provide for themselves. MOST women are provided for by their famalies or husbands. Yes a FEW are independent. but MOST are not and don't want to be.

who 08-08-2007 03:07 PM

I heard it varies according to ovulation

Brother Bilo 08-08-2007 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doctor Dre (Post 12895121)
They preffer a feminine partner but they want a macho man fucking them.

That's exactly it. The macho dude is railing her lights out while the nice guy is at home watching the kids or doing the chores.

Drake 08-08-2007 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 12898179)
it's just cyclical - people's views of what is attractive in the opposite sex changes. when i was young I could never imagine that short hair would ever be cool and bald - hahaha - that used to be a horrible fate for a guy and they'd wear horrible rugs on their head. 20 years ago the masculine hairy look was what men and women wanted - Burt Reynolds, Tom Selleck, Sean Connery etc - guys with open shirts with a mat of black curly hair on their chest. women weren't gagging in horror - that was hot.

and now we are in the feminine looking guy stage - seems to be sticking around for a long time but believe me like everything else it will change again.

i hate body hair - i really do - if that laser shit was fast i'd be all over it.
hogtie me and hang me from the ceiling and laser my ass - but it has to be over in 2 hours max.

Hahaha true. That really puts things into perspective.:2 cents:

There was a time when hairy pussies was all the rage too for guys. Times change and what people want changes with it.

bausch 08-08-2007 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baal.PitBull (Post 12898285)
Providing for and money are not the same thing, and MOST women do NOT provide for themselves. MOST women are provided for by their famalies or husbands. Yes a FEW are independent. but MOST are not and don't want to be.

Uh.. what country are you from? Because here in America plenty of women PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES and some EVEN PROVIDE FOR THEIR HUSBANDS and a lot DO NOT WANT a man to provide for them. Ok?

nation-x 08-09-2007 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12899257)
Uh.. what country are you from? Because here in America plenty of women PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES and some EVEN PROVIDE FOR THEIR HUSBANDS and a lot DO NOT WANT a man to provide for them. Ok?

You are right... there are LOTS of women who have made their own way... I think their are some women that like being the dominent party... but, in my experience, they are a small minority.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ice Cube
You don't want a motherfucker in the mirror longer then you, breaks a nail and his punk ass is looking for glue...


The Sultan Of Smut 08-09-2007 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12897681)
Pornwolf (from gfy), he says that women should accept their husband being unfaithful because that's just the way it is... What do you think of that?

Oh well why didn't you say that in the fist place!!!

</sarcasm>

Baal.PitBull 08-09-2007 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12899257)
Uh.. what country are you from? Because here in America plenty of women PROVIDE FOR THEMSELVES and some EVEN PROVIDE FOR THEIR HUSBANDS and a lot DO NOT WANT a man to provide for them. Ok?


LOL I knew it! You had to play the american card because you assume that I am not. Sorry to burst your bubble princess but not all americans live in the same town they were born in their whole lives.I have lived all over the world. Thats lived not visited for a few weeks on vacation thats lived as in years.

What is your definition of plenty? and what do you call providing for themselves? Sorry to say that a single mother filling out welfare papers for her 3-4 illegit kids is not providing for themselves. Those are MY tax dollars providing for her. And plenty and normal are not equal. Plenty for you might be 1:1000 the NORM would be 600+:1000.

Again let me refresh your mammory in case you forgot.

Quote:

The "norm" for human cultures is for the male to have as many wives as he can support. Its a natural fact! Look at any living organism. The males mate with as many females as possible to reproduce. It is only the strong influence of christianity that prohibits this. Left to nature a man should have as many "wives" as he is able to "support for" and "fight for".

Whats far more complexing is that even in the bible many of the heros had multiple wives. Yet today?


born4porn 08-09-2007 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_SusieQ (Post 12897533)
It's true, A woman likes having a man that keeps up with his looks,the way they dress and hygiene. We try our best to look good for men we care for, I think men should do the same at most times

I totally agree, it's a 2 way street and not just in the bedroom! :thumbsup

Naja-ram 08-09-2007 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bausch (Post 12897788)
Some women make more money than their spouses and do not NEED a man to support them. Has that occurred to you?

There ARE women out there who make their OWN money and even OUTEARN their husbands/boyfriends. Some women do not WANT a man to support them. Don't flatter yourself and think that women need a man to support them, some wouldn't WANT ANY MONEY FROM YOU that and can support themselves fine, thank you.

Some women also do not need a man to "fight" for them. This is no longer the cave age where people get attacked by random tribes or whatever, a lot of women can FIGHT THEIR WAY THROUGH LIFE JUST FINE, and don' NEED a man to protect them.

Don't flatter yourself and think women want your money and need you to protect them.

HAHAHA!!! what a penis envy !
all "women" are girls that need security and bascially a sugar daddy and that 's a fucking fact.
lets see how fast you throw you gay boy once you see a guy that can fuck you hard like you need.
you need a good ramp in the ass and a slap just like every girl on this planet, and you know that turns you own, you know you need the submission just like every little girl , don't you ?
cause if you don't know that - you don't know who you are child.

Sarah_Jayne 08-09-2007 07:04 AM

I love the assumption that just because a man may have more feminine features (something he really can't control) that he must be bad in bed. Also, I can't be the only woman here that just got the urge to punch Naja-ram (albeit an obvious act).

xNetworx 08-09-2007 07:04 AM

I'm from Chicago but live in Scottsdale now. In Chicago, "good looking" macho guys get the most attention from women. In Scottsdale, "good looking" metro and bi-sexual wimpy guys get the most attention from women. Quite a contrast.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123