GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why aren't there no-skim thumb TGP's? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=213385)

progex 12-26-2003 08:04 PM

Why aren't there no-skim thumb TGP's?
 
Why aren't there no-skim thumb TGP's?

Shouldn't the productivity be sky-high?

pamphage 12-26-2003 08:09 PM

try doing it. you'll see yourself. they grow too fucking slow.

fuzebox 12-26-2003 08:10 PM

I tried, had issues with traffic and growth :)

BlackCrayon 12-26-2003 08:11 PM

im surprised skimming actually works. it annoys the hell out of me and as soon as i see im not being directed to the gallery i wanted, the window gets closed. i don't imagine they are sending productive traffic for the most part.

progex 12-26-2003 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pamphage
try doing it. you'll see yourself. they grow too fucking slow.
Then why are there no-skim text-based TGP's?

maxjohan 12-26-2003 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlackCrayon
im surprised skimming actually works. it annoys the hell out of me and as soon as i see im not being directed to the gallery i wanted, the window gets closed. i don't imagine they are sending productive traffic for the most part.
agree :2 cents:

- Jesus Christ - 12-26-2003 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by progex


Then why are there no-skim text-based TGP's?

Text links get clicked more becasue the surfer doesnt know exactly what they are about to see.

pamphage 12-26-2003 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by progex


Then why are there no-skim text-based TGP's?

well there ARE noskim thumb tgps too. im just saying in general.

my guess is that *IF* there are more text based tgps that are no skim because of SE traffic. however i never really noticed that there were more text based non skim tgps than thumbnailed ones.

who knows how successful any of these tgps are. i mean do we even know how much profit sleazydream or juicy make on theirs? i have no clue. estimates would vary widly.

Brad Xtremepay 12-26-2003 08:50 PM

There are noskim TGPs. But growth is impossible. It would take 3 years to build decent loyal traffic.

progex 12-26-2003 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brad Xtremepay
There are noskim TGPs. But growth is impossible. It would take 3 years to build decent loyal traffic.
www.lumberjack-links.com

:Graucho

Zorgman 12-26-2003 09:03 PM

I have a few noskim tgps, traffic is slow but that fine with me. I don't need 100,000 hits a day. Im happy with the low end traffic -- as long as I get bookmarkers. - www.postthumbs.com :thumbsup

Forkbeard 12-26-2003 09:07 PM

I've got a no-skim thumbnail TGP (niche/spanking) that was one of my first efforts in this business. It's got tiny traffic that's not easy to grow. It pays bandwidth and beer money, but that's about it.

uptheyingyang 12-26-2003 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pamphage
try doing it. you'll see yourself. they grow too fucking slow.
pamphage, you are right about this, but is there a compromise situation?

i have 13 no-skim thumb tgps and i'd like faster growth. what trade script would you recommend for a tgp newbie such as me?

i have bought traffic before, but it has not been productive.

my traffic is all niche type stuff, and is productive for me, i'd just like more of it.

pamphage 12-26-2003 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by uptheyingyang


pamphage, you are right about this, but is there a compromise situation?

i have 13 no-skim thumb tgps and i'd like faster growth. what trade script would you recommend for a tgp newbie such as me?

i have bought traffic before, but it has not been productive.

my traffic is all niche type stuff, and is productive for me, i'd just like more of it.

http://turbotraffictrader.com/

SleazyDream 12-27-2003 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brad Xtremepay
There are noskim TGPs. But growth is impossible. It would take 3 years to build decent loyal traffic.
cough cough FOUR

$5 submissions 12-27-2003 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by progex
Why aren't there no-skim thumb TGP's?

Shouldn't the productivity be sky-high?

Interesting. I'll try this out with blog traffic and other porn newbie sources.

SomeCreep 12-27-2003 01:30 AM

Because there can only be 1 thehun

darnit 12-27-2003 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlackCrayon
im surprised skimming actually works. it annoys the hell out of me and as soon as i see im not being directed to the gallery i wanted, the window gets closed. i don't imagine they are sending productive traffic for the most part.
depends on the trade....if you stick with similar sites (for ex thumb tgp to thumb tgp) you can keep the momentum of the trade going many clicks deep.

IMHO, trades will often will make strange bedfellows, some are productive and some arent....just depends on the match of the sites (content/design etc).... skimming is however necessary if you want to grow your traffics reach.

digi 12-27-2003 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SomeCreep
Because there can only be 1 thehun
al4a? worldsex?

Theo 12-27-2003 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by uptheyingyang


i have 13 no-skim thumb tgps

how many total uniques/day?

Stramm 12-27-2003 02:14 AM

http://wetivette.net

I guess it has ~30k.. at least it sends min 5k to my galleries/day

SomeCreep 12-27-2003 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by digi


al4a? worldsex?

nope, they skim traffic to trades. Either with scripts, blind links, or toplists.

progex 12-27-2003 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SomeCreep

nope, they skim traffic to trades. Either with scripts, blind links, or toplists.

WorldSex only skims their traffic to trades in their "Links to other Porn Sites".

There are no misleading blind links that lead to their trades.

SomeCreep 12-27-2003 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by progex


WorldSex only skims their traffic to trades in their "Links to other Porn Sites".

There are no misleading blind links that lead to their trades.

Correct, Worldsex has no misleading links to trades. My point was they still send traffic out to receive traffic in. Worldsex gets tons of traffic from Elephantlist, Sleazydream, and a whole world of other sites. Thehun doesnt skim traffic out at all.

rowan 12-27-2003 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SomeCreep

Correct, Worldsex has no misleading links to trades. My point was they still send traffic out to receive traffic in. Worldsex gets tons of traffic from Elephantlist, Sleazydream, and a whole world of other sites. Thehun doesnt skim traffic out at all.

You're getting confused between trading, and skimming. The latter is where a percentage of clicks on a content link (such as a thumb) get jerked off to another trade.

You can trade without skimming using toplists, every surfer you deliver to your trade is 100% sure he wants to go there...

uptheyingyang 12-27-2003 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel


how many total uniques/day?


approx 2000 combined (i'm counting front page uniques only)

but the tgps are only about 90 days old, and traffic IS building, just building too slow (all traffic is coming from recips)

i will look at TTT today as pamphage suggested.

thanks!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123