![]() |
php vs html for SEO
simple question
i have a choice of doing a site in php/mysql or static html either way actually works out to about the same amount of time setting up the site, maybe just a bit more work on the static html option for future updates, but not that much. so my question is, which would be best for SEO? i think the answer is obvious, but i just wanted some other opinions before i spend the next 2 days knee deep in code |
you can run php as .html extension, so from an SE spider point of view it wouldn't look any different than a static page.
now where is my money? |
i used url rewriting for my php in .htaccess so i can set my links to .html but it actually goes to .php
everything was spidered in google but not inktomi |
PHP is god.
|
php doesn?t spider as well as plain html. If you are building your site for SE hits then html is the only way to go.
|
Quote:
Setup your server to parse html files for php code. It'll show as a .html file, but it'll be dynamic content. Best of both worlds. |
Quote:
|
In terms of google. Freshbot will not list files with the .PHP extention other than that and links with more than 2 variables in them there is no problem.
|
html for the pages BUT for generating link to's either use a desktop app or php script. Also, readable keyword patterns are key.:thumbsup
|
Does the same apply for .asp?
|
Quote:
|
I would stick with HTML
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I answered this to you over ICQ. This was the thread you were referring to right? WG |
Thanks...:thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123